Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
Moderator: Global Moderator
Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
I see many prefer here Vanguard (which I read somewhere is on the more expensive side) in the competition amongst current index fund offerings.
How about DFA/IFA?
To qoute Libertarian666 from http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... /#msg71206
I believe he used to blog for DFA, which IMO is a snake-oil outfit that has funds with a wonderful track record... that was made up by backtesting.
Okay.
So, what are the preferred fund providers here? I tried to find them with a forum search but to no avail. Maybe it would worth a sticky?
How about DFA/IFA?
To qoute Libertarian666 from http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... /#msg71206
I believe he used to blog for DFA, which IMO is a snake-oil outfit that has funds with a wonderful track record... that was made up by backtesting.
Okay.
So, what are the preferred fund providers here? I tried to find them with a forum search but to no avail. Maybe it would worth a sticky?
Last edited by hedgehog on Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
There's a sticky at the top of this section of the forum, called "Master list of PP component ETF/MFD options..." It was last updated in January.
http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... d-options/
http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... d-options/
Last edited by smurff on Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
"I see many prefer here Vanguard (which I read somewhere is on the more expensive side)"
after you investigate this...i don't think you'll find Vanguard to be expensive. If you do, please report back.
after you investigate this...i don't think you'll find Vanguard to be expensive. If you do, please report back.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
The master list is a list of pretty much all funds/ETFs that could be used for the various PP assets. As I read it, hedgehog is asking for something a bit different - i.e. among all the options which ones do we collectively prefer. There's been a fair amount of discussion about brokerages, but as far as I recall not so much about individual funds/ETFs.smurff wrote: There's a sticky at the top of this section of the forum, called "Master list of PP component ETF/MFD options..." It was last updated in January.
http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... d-options/
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
Your linked post is about ETFs. MFD is an unknown acronym for me and Google was no help, so. pls. resolve it. Thank you. I especially asked for index funds, not ETFs.smurff wrote: There's a sticky at the top of this section of the forum, called "Master list of PP component ETF/MFD options..." It was last updated in January.
http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... d-options/
For example: http://assetbuilder.com/our_portfolios/ ... portfolios
They seem to use DFA. Which are trashed as per the quote in my first post.
All in all I am perplexed.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
DFA will not sell its funds directly to individuals, they only sell through advisors which add on their own fees. That rules out DFA in my book.
I like Vanguard best as they have very low expenses, and I think their client-owned structure tends to prevent them from doing things contrary to the interests of individual investors.
The ETFs put out by iShares and Schwab, and Fidelity's Spartan index funds, also have low expenses and seem to be managed well. They are all huge for-profit organizations so I think it's worth keeping an eye on them.
Also the funds in the TSP look excellent.
Why do you think Vanguard is expensive? Every comparison I've seen has ranked them as either the cheapest, or very close.
I like Vanguard best as they have very low expenses, and I think their client-owned structure tends to prevent them from doing things contrary to the interests of individual investors.
The ETFs put out by iShares and Schwab, and Fidelity's Spartan index funds, also have low expenses and seem to be managed well. They are all huge for-profit organizations so I think it's worth keeping an eye on them.
Also the funds in the TSP look excellent.
Why do you think Vanguard is expensive? Every comparison I've seen has ranked them as either the cheapest, or very close.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
For stocks, I prefer VTI or VTSAX. No trading fee, and 0.05% expense ratio. Index funds can also be ETFs so your understanding of ETFs may be flawed.
For bonds, I prefer US Treasuries held at Vanguard
For gold, I have IAU (0.25%), GTU (0.40%), and EEEEAAGLES (4% one-time fee)
Cash I track as part of my savings, checking, and VMMXX
For bonds, I prefer US Treasuries held at Vanguard
For gold, I have IAU (0.25%), GTU (0.40%), and EEEEAAGLES (4% one-time fee)
Cash I track as part of my savings, checking, and VMMXX
- Ad Orientem
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
- Location: Florida USA
- Contact:
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
As far as fund families go, Vanguard is best of breed for all the reasons listed in the preceding comments. You are not likely to go far wrong if you hold a Permanent Portfolio consisting of VGLT, VGSH, VTI and physical gold. If you want to use a gold fund I would go with IAU or maybe GTU if you can buy in during one of those days when gold is getting pounded and thereby buy at a discount.
TLT looks a bit better on paper for long bonds, but I would still go with VGLT. Why? Bluntly I trust Vanguard and I don't trust a lot of those other fund families that often do things in their interest but not yours.
TLT looks a bit better on paper for long bonds, but I would still go with VGLT. Why? Bluntly I trust Vanguard and I don't trust a lot of those other fund families that often do things in their interest but not yours.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15272
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
Vanguard.
I liked them better before they got rid of Pershing and started doing their own accounting, but they're still cheap and good as far as Mutual Funds and ETFs go.
I liked them better before they got rid of Pershing and started doing their own accounting, but they're still cheap and good as far as Mutual Funds and ETFs go.
RIP BRIAN WILSON
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
So what is the proper name of index funds which are not ETFs? Any gold index funds which are not ETFs? Is there a market or demand for it?Khisanth wrote: For stocks, I prefer VTI or VTSAX. No trading fee, and 0.05% expense ratio. Index funds can also be ETFs so your understanding of ETFs may be flawed.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
Vanguard vs. DFA topic.
I understand the BAM alliance may add higher fees to their DFA funds. But pls. correct me in that topic: http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... -alliance/
In my link there seems to be a cheaper option as well for DFA funds, AssetBuilder.com:
http://www.ifa.com/articles/DFA_vs_Vanguard.aspx
http://www.ifa.com/Admin/fees.asp
I understand the BAM alliance may add higher fees to their DFA funds. But pls. correct me in that topic: http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... -alliance/
In my link there seems to be a cheaper option as well for DFA funds, AssetBuilder.com:
And how about IFA for DFA?hedgehog wrote: For example: http://assetbuilder.com/our_portfolios/ ... portfolios
http://www.ifa.com/articles/DFA_vs_Vanguard.aspx
http://www.ifa.com/Admin/fees.asp
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
I haven't found a Permanent Portfolio "approved" gold mutual fund aside from GTU which is a close-ended fund that is traded on the exchange.
I suppose that commodities are too volatile to be formed into a pure mutual fund that has a NAV trade once per day, thus demand for such is not profitable for fund creators.
What is your objection to ETF? The spread and trading commissions?
Admittedly I haven't looked much into DFA once I heard that it requires specific advisors to handle them.
I suppose that commodities are too volatile to be formed into a pure mutual fund that has a NAV trade once per day, thus demand for such is not profitable for fund creators.
What is your objection to ETF? The spread and trading commissions?
Admittedly I haven't looked much into DFA once I heard that it requires specific advisors to handle them.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
What's a NAV trade? Net Asset Value trade or what? I don't know.Khisanth wrote: I suppose that commodities are too volatile to be formed into a pure mutual fund that has a NAV trade once per day, thus demand for such is not profitable for fund creators.
Let's proceed step by step. First figure out DFA, then we can compare DFA and Vanguard index funds to any ETFs okay?Khisanth wrote: What is your objection to ETF? The spread and trading commissions?
Admittedly I haven't looked much into DFA once I heard that it requires specific advisors to handle them.
Anyways, other index fund providers out there other than Vanguard and DFA?
Looking for a solution for this as well. Thank you.hedgehog wrote:MFD is an unknown acronym for me and Google was no help, so. pls. resolve it. Thank you.smurff wrote: There's a sticky at the top of this section of the forum, called "Master list of PP component ETF/MFD options..." It was last updated in January.
http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/pe ... d-options/
Last edited by hedgehog on Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Good, inexpensive index fund providers?
I believe MFD is just someone's makeshift abbreviation for "mutual fund."