The GOLD scream room

Discussion of the Gold portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 »

l82start wrote: i suspected that since i had not heard of it being done, that this kind of shady dealing was unlikely to have been wide spread, (hence the stupid question preface) it just seemed to me that when times are tough and people struggle, that (illegal or otherwise) any possibility to Arbitrage would have been jumped on..  either trade against foreign currency or hustling based on the greater fool theory...
Currencies were fixed against one another. I don't think there was much arbitrage possible at the time.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

Libertarian666 wrote: Once Roosevelt used an executive order to seize all the gold that people had left in banks for safekeeping, he raised the price slowly to $35/oz., as part of a harebrained scheme to raise commodity prices.
I was reviewing the wiki page on Executive Order 6102 yesterday, and while all of your post looks accurate, the page says that that safe deposit boxes were not opened or seized. You didn't mention safe deposit boxes, but I'm bringing them up because the wiki page does. If the wiki page is accurate and the story about those boxes being opened is just a hoax, then I guess a lot of people were able to keep their gold through 1933 and '34 by just leaving their gold in them, though they were unable to trade. Is that right?
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 »

dualstow wrote:
Libertarian666 wrote: Once Roosevelt used an executive order to seize all the gold that people had left in banks for safekeeping, he raised the price slowly to $35/oz., as part of a harebrained scheme to raise commodity prices.
I was reviewing the wiki page on Executive Order 6102 yesterday, and while all of your post looks accurate, the page says that that safe deposit boxes were not opened or seized. You didn't mention safe deposit boxes, but I'm bringing them up because the wiki page does. If the wiki page is accurate and the story about those boxes being opened is just a hoax, then I guess a lot of people were able to keep their gold through 1933 and '34 by just leaving their gold in them, though they were unable to trade. Is that right?
No, as far as I know, safe deposit boxes were not opened or seized as a result of the executive order. But since you weren't allowed to buy or sell gold without a jeweler's license (IIRC), that would greatly reduce the value of holding gold as insurance.
movie buff
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by movie buff »

Some historical background

August 1971 – US president Richard Nixon takes the dollar off the gold standard, which had been in place with minor modifications since the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 and fixed the conversion rate for one Troy ounce of gold at $35.
August 1972 – The US devalues the dollar to $38 an ounce of gold.Sep 17, 2010
Source: Gold prices – the highs and lows since 1971 - The Guardian

http://www.theguardian.com/business/201 ... e-timeline

https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor ... iat-money/
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3647
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona »

GDX lost 4% today, I almost got stopped out. Maybe tomorrow.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 »

ochotona wrote: GDX lost 4% today, I almost got stopped out. Maybe tomorrow.
It always amazes me when people supposedly using the PP use gold stocks instead of gold. I guess gold isn't volatile enough for them, and has too high an expected return?
Of course I suppose you can use anything in a VP, but why not just buy lottery tickets?
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

Libertarian666 wrote:
ochotona wrote: GDX lost 4% today, I almost got stopped out. Maybe tomorrow.
It always amazes me when people supposedly using the PP use gold stocks instead of gold. I guess gold isn't volatile enough for them, and has too high an expected return?
Of course I suppose you can use anything in a VP, but why not just buy lottery tickets?
+1
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3647
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona »

I booked a 25% profit in 12 trading days.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

ochotona wrote: I booked a 25% profit in 12 trading days.
Very nice. How much did you gamble, and what is your next trade?
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
Fred
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Fred »

I re-balanced into gold in December but I only brought it up to 20% because I decided to leave my stock allocation where it was at 40% and call it the Golden Butterfly. I kind of regret that right now. 
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew »

Fred wrote: I re-balanced into gold in December but I only brought it up to 20% because I decided to leave my stock allocation where it was at 40% and call it the Golden Butterfly. I kind of regret that right now.
Re-balancing into gold in December saved your bacon!
Q1 2016 has started out eerily similar to Q1 2015 when stocks were down and both gold and LTT's were positive.
Not clear whether the trend will continue, but I plan to buy more stocks as soon as the EOY bonus clears. Being gold and LTT heavy is worrisome to me.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
ochotona
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3647
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:54 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by ochotona »

It was totally luck. I committed $5000 to buy and hold of GDX, but the market had other ideas. I won't play again for a while.
Fred
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Fred »

buddtholomew wrote: Being gold and LTT heavy is worrisome to me.
I thought a read a post of yours where you were finally happy with the way the PP is going. It's sounding to me like worry is your natural state of mind.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

ochotona wrote: It was totally luck. I committed $5000 to buy and hold of GDX, but the market had other ideas. I won't play again for a while.
"Treat me to dinner", as they say in Chinese. :-) Well, I'm glad it worked out, and I'm glad you didn't put in more than that even though it worked out. Well done.
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew »

Fred wrote:
buddtholomew wrote: Being gold and LTT heavy is worrisome to me.
I thought a read a post of yours where you were finally happy with the way the PP is going. It's sounding to me like worry is your natural state of mind.
Yes, I am the resident worrier but more at peace than I have ever been with the PP.
All I'm saying is I prefer to have a bias towards equities as times of prosperity are more pleasurable than those of excess inflation, deflation or recession.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

I'm with you, Budd. Stocks are best, and all's well when the entire country (or world) is prospering and innovations are materializing.

At the same time, doesn't it feel good to see some red turn to black? Well, perhaps some seasoned pp'ers already have a lot of black, or all black. I'm sure a lot of tech's gold holdings are well in the black. But, aside from my gold purchase last month, all my gold is in the red. All of it. Some of it is about to breach breakeven if things continue upward. I'll be so happy just to have it at zero. Whoo-hoo!
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 »

buddtholomew wrote:
Fred wrote:
buddtholomew wrote: Being gold and LTT heavy is worrisome to me.
I thought a read a post of yours where you were finally happy with the way the PP is going. It's sounding to me like worry is your natural state of mind.
Yes, I am the resident worrier but more at peace than I have ever been with the PP.
All I'm saying is I prefer to have a bias towards equities as times of prosperity are more pleasurable than those of excess inflation, deflation or recession.
That's why I have a bias against equities. In times of prosperity, I can get a job and the economy is reasonably pleasant, so I don't worry about my portfolio as much. It's the other times that I want my portfolio to protect me.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew »

Libertarian666 wrote:
buddtholomew wrote:
Fred wrote: I thought a read a post of yours where you were finally happy with the way the PP is going. It's sounding to me like worry is your natural state of mind.
We are more alike than different. I
Yes, I am the resident worrier but more at peace than I have ever been with the PP.
All I'm saying is I prefer to have a bias towards equities as times of prosperity are more pleasurable than those of excess inflation, deflation or recession.
That's why I have a bias against equities. In times of prosperity, I can get a job and the economy is reasonably pleasant, so I don't worry about my portfolio as much. It's the other times that I want my portfolio to protect me.
We are more alike than different in this regard.
I invest in the PP for stability and to meet expenses in the event of a job loss.
The balance is more heavily invested in stocks as I want to participate during times of prosperity as well.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by buddtholomew »

dualstow wrote: I'm with you, Budd. Stocks are best, and all's well when the entire country (or world) is prospering and innovations are materializing.

At the same time, doesn't it feel good to see some red turn to black? Well, perhaps some seasoned pp'ers already have a lot of black, or all black. I'm sure a lot of tech's gold holdings are well in the black. But, aside from my gold purchase last month, all my gold is in the red. All of it. Some of it is about to breach breakeven if things continue upward. I'll be so happy just to have it at zero. Whoo-hoo!
Absolutely. My gold position is still down 10%+, but as a whole stocks, LTT's and 3% CD's have produced a respectable CAGR since 2011.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Libertarian666 »

By the way, did anyone see the spike to 1216? I think it lasted 30 seconds, but we're still at 1208.

Let me guess: Yellen caved in on interest rates?
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

Libertarian666 wrote: By the way, did anyone see the spike to 1216? I think it lasted 30 seconds, but we're still at 1208.

Let me guess: Yellen caved in on interest rates?
Janet Yellen Signals Caution on Rates
Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen hinted to Congress Wednesday that the central bank had increased trepidation over the path of interest-rate increases, pointing to accumulating risks to the economy in recent weeks.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/yellen-flag ... 1455111066
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
dragoncar
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dragoncar »

buddtholomew wrote:
dualstow wrote: I'm with you, Budd. Stocks are best, and all's well when the entire country (or world) is prospering and innovations are materializing.

At the same time, doesn't it feel good to see some red turn to black? Well, perhaps some seasoned pp'ers already have a lot of black, or all black. I'm sure a lot of tech's gold holdings are well in the black. But, aside from my gold purchase last month, all my gold is in the red. All of it. Some of it is about to breach breakeven if things continue upward. I'll be so happy just to have it at zero. Whoo-hoo!
Absolutely. My gold position is still down 10%+, but as a whole stocks, LTT's and 3% CD's have produced a respectable CAGR since 2011.
My gold is still down 20% due to contribution timing
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

dragoncar wrote:
Buddtholomew wrote: Absolutely. My gold position is still down 10%+,
My gold is still down 20% due to contribution timing
Mine's down 19%. I wish I could blame it on markup, but no. The good performance of gold probably got me interested in craig's pp posts at bogleheads circa 2010. It's still better than chasing some silly fund because of last year's performance, but since I didn't buy gold "before it was cool", it's going to take some more years to really have a seasoned portfolio. One day it will look lush and green like Tyler's charts, like finely trimmed kikuyu grass.  ;)
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
User avatar
Dieter
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 681
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:51 am

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by Dieter »

My gold recently is less down than my LTT are up, but gold still negative.

Another Johny come lately - Stocks, Bonds, and gold all looked overpriced - market decided only gold was....

Didn't do lump sum. So that helped a bit. I've generally stayed equity heavy (42% ish) in the ~40 of my retirement funds that are Butterflyish.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15225
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: The GOLD scream room

Post by dualstow »

Either I'm reading the wrong numbers, or tech's going to have a biiiig smile on his face this morning.
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
Post Reply