Sorry for the technical difficulties

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by MediumTex »

We're trying to get them ironed out.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by Tyler »

I admit I was starting to get worried the last few days.  I feel like a junkie needing a fix.

Glad we're back!
User avatar
Greg
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:12 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by Greg »

Tyler wrote: I feel like a junkie needing a fix.
I fully agree to this point. I really love being on this forum, I really respect the opinions of a lot of people on here, and normally come here first to figure out what news around the world is worth reading about.
Background: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics, Control Systems, CAD Modeling, Machining, Wearable Exoskeletons, Applied Physiology, Drawing (Pencil/Charcoal), Drums, Guitar/Bass, Piano, Flute

"you are not disabled by your disabilities but rather, abled by your abilities." -Oscar Pistorius
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by rickb »

I assumed it was Budd's thousands of posts about losing his shi[r]*t in the current stock market decline.

I mean, seriously, WTF kind of asset allocation includes such a volatile asset as stocks?  25% of my money has lost, what, 10% over the last 3 days.  10% loss in 3 days !!!!!!!!!  Whoever suggested I buy stocks is a friggin idiot. 

I am, of course, kidding.  But, actually seriously, I'm curious how Budd is taking this.  And I'd like a report from Mathjak as well (if you had kept the PP you'd started, where would you be now compared to where you actually are now).  Perhaps in a different thread.

The point is the PP lets you ignore this kind of hysteria.  Yeah, yeah, yeah - the stock market went down 2% yesterday AND the day before, AND another 3% today.  Frankly, I don't care very much without even looking how long term bonds and gold did (both up?  cool).
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15260
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by dualstow »

rickb wrote:
I mean, seriously, WTF kind of asset allocation includes such a volatile asset as stocks?  25% of my money has lost, what, 10% over the last 3 days.  10% loss in 3 days !!!!!!!!!  Whoever suggested I buy stocks is a friggin idiot. 
Hahaha
This is one of the reasons I've been missing the forum.
.
fi50@fi2023
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:56 pm

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by fi50@fi2023 »

Eye of the storm is awesome!
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by Cortopassi »

rickb wrote:
The point is the PP lets you ignore this kind of hysteria.  Yeah, yeah, yeah - the stock market went down 2% yesterday AND the day before, AND another 3% today.  Frankly, I don't care very much without even looking how long term bonds and gold did (both up?  cool).
Amen.  I believe 25% equal weight PPers were up for the week!  How satisfying is it to look at and hear all the news stories on the terrible week and 500 point drop and stay the course, it's all China, etc and not even care!
Test of the signature line
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by buddtholomew »

rickb wrote: I assumed it was Budd's thousands of posts about losing his shi[r]*t in the current stock market decline.

I mean, seriously, WTF kind of asset allocation includes such a volatile asset as stocks?  25% of my money has lost, what, 10% over the last 3 days.  10% loss in 3 days !!!!!!!!!  Whoever suggested I buy stocks is a friggin idiot. 

I am, of course, kidding.  But, actually seriously, I'm curious how Budd is taking this.  And I'd like a report from Mathjak as well (if you had kept the PP you'd started, where would you be now compared to where you actually are now).  Perhaps in a different thread.

The point is the PP lets you ignore this kind of hysteria.  Yeah, yeah, yeah - the stock market went down 2% yesterday AND the day before, AND another 3% today.  Frankly, I don't care very much without even looking how long term bonds and gold did (both up?  cool).
Budd is doing well, thanks for asking!
Getting ready to rebalance to target allocation in retirement accounts.
This is exactly as I envisioned the scenario playing out.
PP stability in taxable is giving me the fortitude to buy equities following a decline.
Would like to see some more performance from PP as still negative YTD.
What's with LTT's on Friday?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15260
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by dualstow »

buddtholomew wrote: What's with LTT's on Friday?
You mean you expected them to soar in proportion to the stock plunge? If so, it doesn't work that way, unfortunately.
.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Sorry for the technical difficulties

Post by MachineGhost »

MediumTex wrote: We're trying to get them ironed out.
Still ongoing.  I really wish you would change ISPs.  Enough is enough!!!
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Post Reply