Marc Faber has proposed an eerily familiar asset allocation

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Marc Faber has proposed an eerily familiar asset allocation

Post by Libertarian666 »

"Investors and savers need an escape plan. The safety boat which Dr. Faber has in mind entails a highly diversified portfolio.

Among the basket of assets he proposes are a 25% allocation to stocks, a 25% allocation to property, 30-year U.S. Treasuries and precious metals."

http://www.goldcore.com/us/gold-blog/fi ... als-faber/
User avatar
ozzy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

Re: Marc Faber has proposed an eerily familiar asset allocation

Post by ozzy »

Hmm, his portfolio sounds vaguely familiar  :P
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Marc Faber has proposed an eerily familiar asset allocation

Post by MediumTex »

By not crediting Harry Browne, he is either arrogant or ignorant.

Faber is great, but he's still just an entertainer.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
LC475
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:23 pm

Re: Marc Faber has proposed an eerily familiar asset allocation

Post by LC475 »

What he put forth on CNBC is not a Permanent Portfolio.  No need to credit Harry Browne (and please don't!).

"I think it's worthwhile to have your own safety boat"
"I have advised my investors and also on this program that you have to have a diversification and that you should hold around 25% in stocks, 25% in real estate and actually today I just bought a 30-year Treasury bond" …  "And I would also hold some commodities, precious metals."

A Permanent Portfolio is 25% stocks, true, but 0% real estate in final iteration (and never 25%).  It is also 0% other commodities.  It also specifies percentages of 30-year bonds, and of gold, while Mr. Faber did not.

I don't think that Mr. Faber's pontifyings have anything to do with Harry Browne nor the Permanent Portfolio and the 25% figures were just a coincidence due to the fact that 25% is always a nice, round figure; Harry wasn't the first to notice that.
Post Reply