Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
Moderator: Global Moderator
Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
We all know you don't time PP. However if your VP is one in which you buy stocks, do you think being in cash could mean missing another run up?
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15189
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
yep.
Monstres and tokeninges gert he be-kend, / And wondirs in the air send.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
Seems like it's always a dangerous time to be in and out of the market.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
If it's always dangerous 100% of the time then does anything other than dnagerous exist? If nothing other than dangerous exists then does dangerous exist? Doesn't it need something else to be dangerous relative to in order to exist as dangerous?dragoncar wrote: Seems like it's always a dangerous time to be in and out of the market.
If you say "Well there is very dangerous and less dangerous", does that mean less dangerous is actually safe?
Thought for food.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
There is no safe, only degrees of danger.Kshartle wrote:If it's always dangerous 100% of the time then does anything other than dnagerous exist? If nothing other than dangerous exists then does dangerous exist? Doesn't it need something else to be dangerous relative to in order to exist as dangerous?dragoncar wrote: Seems like it's always a dangerous time to be in and out of the market.
If you say "Well there is very dangerous and less dangerous", does that mean less dangerous is actually safe?
Thought for food.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
If every adult bengal tiger is 400-550 pounds, are there light tigers and heavy tigers, or only different degrees of heavy tigers?buddtholomew wrote:There is no safe, only degrees of danger.Kshartle wrote:If it's always dangerous 100% of the time then does anything other than dnagerous exist? If nothing other than dangerous exists then does dangerous exist? Doesn't it need something else to be dangerous relative to in order to exist as dangerous?dragoncar wrote: Seems like it's always a dangerous time to be in and out of the market.
If you say "Well there is very dangerous and less dangerous", does that mean less dangerous is actually safe?
Thought for food.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
Sure, but at overvalued markets like this one, virtually no one retains more than half of the preceding gains after the party ends. So avoiding losses has more impact than being greedy. But valuation alone is a terrible timing tool.portart wrote: We all know you don't time PP. However if your VP is one in which you buy stocks, do you think being in cash could mean missing another run up?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
- Stewardship
- Executive Member
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:31 am
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
It's only dangerous 100% of the time in or out of the market. If you are neither in nor out of the market, then it is dangerous 0-100% of the time.Kshartle wrote:If it's always dangerous 100% of the time then does anything other than dnagerous exist? If nothing other than dangerous exists then does dangerous exist? Doesn't it need something else to be dangerous relative to in order to exist as dangerous?dragoncar wrote: Seems like it's always a dangerous time to be in and out of the market.
If you say "Well there is very dangerous and less dangerous", does that mean less dangerous is actually safe?
Thought for food.
In a world of ever-increasing financial intangibility and government imposition, I tend to expect otherwise.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
As long as long term interest rates remain low, stocks are a good place to be.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
With one qualification, if interest rates remain low, it is because economic growth is not supporting stock values and that low rates are creating a bubble and we are vulnerable to a correction. That is why bonds and gold are outperforming stocks because many are skeptical, just a theory of course.ngcpa wrote: As long as long term interest rates remain low, stocks are a good place to be.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
That is why bonds and gold are outperforming stocks
Perhaps this is true over a very , very short time frame like perhaps a week or two. Over the past couple of years stocks have way outperformed bonds and gold
Perhaps this is true over a very , very short time frame like perhaps a week or two. Over the past couple of years stocks have way outperformed bonds and gold
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15189
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
Like Schroedinger's cat?Stewardship wrote: If you are neither in nor out of the market, then it is dangerous 0-100% of the time.
Monstres and tokeninges gert he be-kend, / And wondirs in the air send.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
I thought that you were going to call it Schroedinger's Feline Fund.
Re: Is This A Dangerous Time to be Out of the Market?
ngcpa, an allocation of 50/50 long bonds and gold have outperformed the total stock index 8.98% to 4.22% over the last 14 years and so far this year, 100% long bond was 7.04% in the same period and gold was 10.18%, these figures are cagr.ngcpa wrote: That is why bonds and gold are outperforming stocks
Perhaps this is true over a very , very short time frame like perhaps a week or two. Over the past couple of years stocks have way outperformed bonds and gold