2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by craigr »

Podcast for December 8th, 2010

Topics

What bonds to buy for the Permanent Portfolio.

Why only own 100% US Treasury Bonds?

Why to avoid municipal, corporate, junk and government agency bonds.

Problems with actively managed bond funds.

Individual bonds vs. bond funds.

Performance of bonds in 2008's market crash.

How to buy bonds.

Recommended bond funds if you can’t buy individual bonds.

Dangers of reaching for yield.

Are bonds too expensive today?


Be sure to subscribe in iTunes to get podcasts automatically. Also be sure to rate the podcasts in the iTunes store:

http://itunes.apple.com/podcast/crawlin ... d400543437

RSS Feed:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160324133 ... cast/feed/
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15253
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

Very informative podcast. I did not know that VUSTX was not a wise choice. I currently hold both 30-Year Treasuries (directly) and VUSTX, but not so much of the latter. I will probably only buy direct or TLT from on.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15253
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

If you don't mind a little nitpicking
- You shouldn't say "down minus ten percent." Just down ten percent.
- And, pundits, not pundints.

Again, the podcast was very informative. I really enjoyed it.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by craigr »

dualstow wrote: Very informative podcast. I did not know that VUSTX was not a wise choice. I currently hold both 30-Year Treasuries (directly) and VUSTX, but not so much of the latter. I will probably only buy direct or TLT from on.
It's Ok. Just not as good as other options if you have them. I wish they wouldn't do the 80/20 thing with their Treasury funds. I see no point in this activity.
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by craigr »

dualstow wrote: If you don't mind a little nitpicking
- You shouldn't say "down minus ten percent." Just down ten percent.
Ah yes. Just trying to get the point across about how badly these other options had done.
- And, pundits, not pundints.
I'll have to listen to how I'm pronouncing that word. I didn't know it was coming off that way.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15253
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by dualstow »

craigr wrote: I'll have to listen to how I'm pronouncing that word. I didn't know it was coming off that way.
Maybe it's just the mic. You still don't sound nasal, like I do.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
User avatar
Lone Wolf
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio

Post by Lone Wolf »

Very much enjoyed the bond overview \ review.  I think you especially dismantled the idea of junk bonds (pardon me, high-yield bonds) as a good portfolio diversifier, a concept that has always struck me as a bad idea.

The GNMA coverage was also good for breaking down why even a "full faith and credit" instrument may not fit properly into a Permanent Portfolio due to its characteristics.  I remember finding it enlightening when Browne covered these points in "Why the Best-Laid Investment Plans Usually Go Wrong".
Post Reply