Podcast for December 8th, 2010
Topics
What bonds to buy for the Permanent Portfolio.
Why only own 100% US Treasury Bonds?
Why to avoid municipal, corporate, junk and government agency bonds.
Problems with actively managed bond funds.
Individual bonds vs. bond funds.
Performance of bonds in 2008's market crash.
How to buy bonds.
Recommended bond funds if you can’t buy individual bonds.
Dangers of reaching for yield.
Are bonds too expensive today?
Be sure to subscribe in iTunes to get podcasts automatically. Also be sure to rate the podcasts in the iTunes store:
http://itunes.apple.com/podcast/crawlin ... d400543437
RSS Feed:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324133 ... cast/feed/
2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
Moderator: Global Moderator
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15253
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
Very informative podcast. I did not know that VUSTX was not a wise choice. I currently hold both 30-Year Treasuries (directly) and VUSTX, but not so much of the latter. I will probably only buy direct or TLT from on.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15253
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
If you don't mind a little nitpicking
- You shouldn't say "down minus ten percent." Just down ten percent.
- And, pundits, not pundints.
Again, the podcast was very informative. I really enjoyed it.
- You shouldn't say "down minus ten percent." Just down ten percent.
- And, pundits, not pundints.
Again, the podcast was very informative. I really enjoyed it.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
It's Ok. Just not as good as other options if you have them. I wish they wouldn't do the 80/20 thing with their Treasury funds. I see no point in this activity.dualstow wrote: Very informative podcast. I did not know that VUSTX was not a wise choice. I currently hold both 30-Year Treasuries (directly) and VUSTX, but not so much of the latter. I will probably only buy direct or TLT from on.
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
Ah yes. Just trying to get the point across about how badly these other options had done.dualstow wrote: If you don't mind a little nitpicking
- You shouldn't say "down minus ten percent." Just down ten percent.
I'll have to listen to how I'm pronouncing that word. I didn't know it was coming off that way.- And, pundits, not pundints.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15253
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
Maybe it's just the mic. You still don't sound nasal, like I do.craigr wrote: I'll have to listen to how I'm pronouncing that word. I didn't know it was coming off that way.
RIP Johnathan Joss, aka John Redcorn on King of the Hill
Re: 2010-12-08 - Bonds for the Permanent Portfolio
Very much enjoyed the bond overview \ review. I think you especially dismantled the idea of junk bonds (pardon me, high-yield bonds) as a good portfolio diversifier, a concept that has always struck me as a bad idea.
The GNMA coverage was also good for breaking down why even a "full faith and credit" instrument may not fit properly into a Permanent Portfolio due to its characteristics. I remember finding it enlightening when Browne covered these points in "Why the Best-Laid Investment Plans Usually Go Wrong".
The GNMA coverage was also good for breaking down why even a "full faith and credit" instrument may not fit properly into a Permanent Portfolio due to its characteristics. I remember finding it enlightening when Browne covered these points in "Why the Best-Laid Investment Plans Usually Go Wrong".