Seems like an easy, mechanical strategy. It might even be something to consider trying with options.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2 ... tth0000001
Moderator: Global Moderator
That was only two times in a century!MediumTex wrote: Market falls by 50% or more 2-3 times a century?![]()
![]()
Tell that to a NASDAQ investor who sat through two 50%+ market declines in one decade (2000-2009).
I mean...there are some people who like to use their VP to overweight the stock portion of their PP, so I think having some cash to buy when things are a bit cheaper is a good idea. In reality, it's probably not much different from having a VP that's 80% SPY and 20% Cash and using rebalancing bands.Pointedstick wrote: But I guess in the scheme of things, it doesn't really matter much because you're still buying low when everyone else is panicking and selling.
Here it is since 1997 (the furthest back I could get).MediumTex wrote: I wonder how well that strategy would have worked since 1990 for a Japanese stock investor.