Permanent Portfolio historical performance - I am confused

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
jason
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:10 pm

Permanent Portfolio historical performance - I am confused

Post by jason »

I was looking at the PP performance stats on Crawlingroad.com at https://web.archive.org/web/20160324133 ... l-returns/. I was curious about the average performance of each asset class, so I averaged each column.  It seems to show very high performance for stocks, bonds, and gold - much higher than I was expecting.  When I average each column, starting in 1972, I get 11.46% average return for the US stock market, 9% average return for 30 year treasuries, 7.03% average return for cash, and 11.97% average return for gold. 

Lower down on the page, CraigR says that the average return for the total stock market since 1972 is 9.7%.  That is almost 2% lower than 11.46%.  So, why is the data broken down by year showing stock market returns that are so much higher?  Did I make an math error somewhere, perhaps related to compounding?  Are the other stats for cash, treasuries and gold accurate?  I'm guessing I am missing something important, but I'm not sure what I am doing wrong.  Is averaging each column the wrong way to determine average annual performance?

Thanks!
Last edited by jason on Tue Jul 16, 2013 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
zen
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:39 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio historical performance - I am confused

Post by zen »

Averaging doesn't work because the percentages are multiplication factors. If you think about this very simple case, an imaginary investment where in year 1 your money gains +50% and in year two your money loses -50%. You might think that you end up with the same amount you started with, but that's not actually true. If you invested 100$, you would have 150$ after year one, and 75$ after year two.

The correct formula can be found here: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cagr.asp
User avatar
AdamA
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio historical performance - I am confused

Post by AdamA »

jason wrote: I'm guessing I am missing something important, but I'm not sure what I am doing wrong.  Is averaging each column the wrong way to determine average annual performance?
You're confusing the average return and the compound annual growth rate.

http://www.assetplay.net/article/basics ... erage.html

(just a quick example that shows the difference)
"All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone."

Pascal
User avatar
jason
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:10 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio historical performance - I am confused

Post by jason »

Thanks.  That makes a lot more sense.  Please excuse my ignorance.
Post Reply