EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by buddtholomew »

I would like to shelter as much of the long-term bonds as possible. Given limited tax-deferred space, does it make sense to replace TLT with a smaller percentage of EDV? If so, what is the recommended ratio of TLT to EDV?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by Pointedstick »

EDV is tax-inefficient, and has a tendency to pay out huge distributions at the end of the year. I have EDV in a taxable account, and if I were doing it all again, I'd probably go with individual bonds rather than the fund just for predictability's sake.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by buddtholomew »

Pointedstick wrote: EDV is tax-inefficient, and has a tendency to pay out huge distributions at the end of the year. I have EDV in a taxable account, and if I were doing it all again, I'd probably go with individual bonds rather than the fund just for predictability's sake.
I plan on holding EDV in a tax-deferred account. The question is in what proportion should EDV be in relation to the other 3 components (25%?). Also if I have TLT in taxable as well, how would I calculate how much is required to maintain the appropriate bond balance?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
melveyr
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 971
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:30 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by melveyr »

buddtholomew wrote:
Pointedstick wrote: EDV is tax-inefficient, and has a tendency to pay out huge distributions at the end of the year. I have EDV in a taxable account, and if I were doing it all again, I'd probably go with individual bonds rather than the fund just for predictability's sake.
I plan on holding EDV in a tax-deferred account. The question is in what proportion should EDV be in relation to the other 3 components (25%?). Also if I have TLT in taxable as well, how would I calculate how much is required to maintain the appropriate bond balance?
budd,

For weightings you could do the risk parity thing. You just do your weightings by looking at 1/vol. This gives you higher weighting to less volatile instruments and lower weighting to high volatile instruments (like EDV). Volatility is a moving target but its better than nothing. Looking over long windows of time also makes it less of a moving target.
everything comes from somewhere and everything goes somewhere
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by buddtholomew »

Thanks Melveyr. I would like to keep it as simple as possible and arrived at the following example:

TLT - 25K
EDV - 2/3 of 15K or 10K

Total Bonds 35K
SPY, GLD and Cash each 40K

Does this seem reasonable?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
melveyr
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 971
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 3:30 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: EDV vs. TLT in Tax Deferred

Post by melveyr »

buddtholomew wrote: Thanks Melveyr. I would like to keep it as simple as possible and arrived at the following example:

TLT - 25K
EDV - 2/3 of 15K or 10K

Total Bonds 35K
SPY, GLD and Cash each 40K

Does this seem reasonable?
Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Nothing about asset allocation needs to be precise!  I understand why you value simplicity . ;D
everything comes from somewhere and everything goes somewhere
Post Reply