chemotherapy analogy for PP and tinkering

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
stone
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2627
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 7:43 am
Contact:

chemotherapy analogy for PP and tinkering

Post by stone »

A classic example of the human desire to tinker unproductively is the history of chemotherapy treatment for NHL (a type of blood cancer).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHOP

The first successful treatment used four different drugs. Each had different unwanted effects and also attacked the tumor in different ways. Using the four together enabled the tumor to be got rid of without the patient suffering too much permanent damage.

To try and improve upon that basic treatment, subsequent modifications were made including various different extra drugs. It was believed that these 2nd and 3rd generation regimes took the basic principle to the next level giving better outcomes. A decade later, the people who developed the original treatment  did a large trial comparing the original basic treatment against the "3rd generation" treatments. The original treatment regime turned out to have better outcomes than the supposed improved methods as well as being much less expensive.
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment." - Mulla Nasrudin
User avatar
AdamA
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: chemotherapy analogy for PP and tinkering

Post by AdamA »

stone wrote: A classic example of the human desire to tinker unproductively is the history of chemotherapy treatment for NHL (a type of blood cancer).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHOP

The first successful treatment used four different drugs. Each had different unwanted effects and also attacked the tumor in different ways. Using the four together enabled the tumor to be got rid of without the patient suffering too much permanent damage.

To try and improve upon that basic treatment, subsequent modifications were made including various different extra drugs. It was believed that these 2nd and 3rd generation regimes took the basic principle to the next level giving better outcomes. A decade later, the people who developed the original treatment  did a large trial comparing the original basic treatment against the "3rd generation" treatments. The original treatment regime turned out to have better outcomes than the supposed improved methods as well as being much less expensive.
This happens all the time in medicine. 
"All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone."

Pascal
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: chemotherapy analogy for PP and tinkering

Post by MachineGhost »

Interesting analogy.  I can think of a number of parallels between "modern" medicine and Wall Street.  I would not lay the blame on tinker as much as greed.

MG
stone wrote: A classic example of the human desire to tinker unproductively is the history of chemotherapy treatment for NHL (a type of blood cancer).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHOP

The first successful treatment used four different drugs. Each had different unwanted effects and also attacked the tumor in different ways. Using the four together enabled the tumor to be got rid of without the patient suffering too much permanent damage.

To try and improve upon that basic treatment, subsequent modifications were made including various different extra drugs. It was believed that these 2nd and 3rd generation regimes took the basic principle to the next level giving better outcomes. A decade later, the people who developed the original treatment  did a large trial comparing the original basic treatment against the "3rd generation" treatments. The original treatment regime turned out to have better outcomes than the supposed improved methods as well as being much less expensive.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Post Reply