Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
https://www.capitalspectator.com/choose ... carefully/
Morningstar last week advised that tactical asset allocation funds “failed—again.” That sounds ominous for this class of strategies, but a closer review suggests it’s misguided to pull the plug on the on idea that dynamically adjusting weights of asset classes has crashed and burned. As discussed below, the case for tactical asset allocation (TAA) is quite strong, assuming you’re an informed investor able and willing to separate the wheat from the chaff in this corner of portfolio management.
Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
Moderator: Global Moderator
Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
I don't know what it is, but I monitor this class of ETFs albeit loosely, and I haven't found any one of them that piques my interest as a TAA user. By TAA user I mean almost 100% of my equity slice is tactical.
The portfolio I built has a backtest over many time frames that clubs the commercially available ETFs / mutual funds like a lost baby seal during a seal hunt. And that includes trade friction.
But I've noticed that my portfolio is very trade-y. Think 300% turnover per year. I think maybe commercial products just can't be that nimble. That can't go from cash to an equity position in one go one month, then go back to cash the next.
My portfolio gets an at-bat and swings for the fences, or it decides to bunt or try to get hit by a pitch, or lets someone else steal a base based on the momentum signal for that month. That's why it's so active.
All of that activity results in rather small changes to the monthly success rate, but these small in the at-bat odds changes make all the difference
60/40 # of profitable months 66.5%, worst month -10.3% sharpe ratio 1.17 maxDD -9%
my TAA port # of profitable months 69.2%, worst month -5.3% sharpe ratio 0.68 maxDD -30%
similar CAGR about 10%
My conclusion is if you're unwilling or structurally unable to make big moves guided by the indicators... best not to try. Honestly, just hold the HBPP or GB.
The portfolio I built has a backtest over many time frames that clubs the commercially available ETFs / mutual funds like a lost baby seal during a seal hunt. And that includes trade friction.
But I've noticed that my portfolio is very trade-y. Think 300% turnover per year. I think maybe commercial products just can't be that nimble. That can't go from cash to an equity position in one go one month, then go back to cash the next.
My portfolio gets an at-bat and swings for the fences, or it decides to bunt or try to get hit by a pitch, or lets someone else steal a base based on the momentum signal for that month. That's why it's so active.
All of that activity results in rather small changes to the monthly success rate, but these small in the at-bat odds changes make all the difference
60/40 # of profitable months 66.5%, worst month -10.3% sharpe ratio 1.17 maxDD -9%
my TAA port # of profitable months 69.2%, worst month -5.3% sharpe ratio 0.68 maxDD -30%
similar CAGR about 10%
My conclusion is if you're unwilling or structurally unable to make big moves guided by the indicators... best not to try. Honestly, just hold the HBPP or GB.
- mathjak107
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4623
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
- Location: bayside queens ny
- Contact:
Re: Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
well these portfolios i mentioned are not tactically allocated .
they stay fixed , some are not even rebalanced unless the fed lowers orraises rates and even then its only rebalanced that once
as an example here is the accelerated pp .
there is nothing tactically changed
25% leveraged stock funds (UPRO),
27.5%% leveraged long-term treasury bond funds (TMF),
25% preferred stock funds (PFF
and 22.5% gold (GLDM).
they stay fixed , some are not even rebalanced unless the fed lowers orraises rates and even then its only rebalanced that once
as an example here is the accelerated pp .
there is nothing tactically changed
25% leveraged stock funds (UPRO),
27.5%% leveraged long-term treasury bond funds (TMF),
25% preferred stock funds (PFF
and 22.5% gold (GLDM).
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15189
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
Someone was in a mood
Monstres and tokeninges gert he be-kend, / And wondirs in the air send.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15189
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Attention: Mathjak! Choose Your Tactical Asset Allocation Strategy Carefully
And I thought Crazy Eddie was crazy. Turns out he was amateur hour.
Monstres and tokeninges gert he be-kend, / And wondirs in the air send.