moda0306 wrote:
Benko,
Alright... Let's leave the semantics aside, shall we?
Why would a socialist engage in activities that he believes will have marginal benefits to the safety and stability of a country if he desires to make it marginally less stable and safe?
Perhaps the issue is that labeling people, although quite entertaining, is not really very illustrative of what a person is or believes. For example, I do not vote with a "one size fits all" mentality, nor to I presume to be liberal on every issue, conservative on every issue, libertarian on every issue, a socialist on every issue, etc. And for another example of duality paradox, from a Lutheran religious perspective I'm simultaneously a saint and sinner - "Simul iustus et peccator".
On your other point, of course dear leader could simultaneously be a follower of Islam and Christianity ... he would not have to pull a
voter God ID card to prove anything. And, besides, it clearly says on his widely disseminated birth certificate what his religion is.
... Mountaineer
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3