Gold to $1050 next year?

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by Gumby »

Xan wrote: My understanding is that ad blockers DO block Google Analytics.
Might be the case, but better to get confirmation on that. People seem to suggest donottrack.me for GA.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by MediumTex »

Xan wrote:
Pointedstick wrote: Given what Gumby has (accurately) posted, this complaint strikes me as somewhat akin to grousing about being rained on while holding an umbrella. Just install the dang ad blocker and move on with life! :) Life's too short to get upset about how websites are tracking people when you have the means to stop it within your own power.
My guess is that Rick (remember, he works in the industry) is with a company that relies on web ads for revenue.  That's the only thing I can think of that would explain his reluctance to install an ad blocker.
Rick may just be trying to be helpful to less sophisticated forum members/visitors (I would probably include myself in this group).

Rick has never provided anything but useful feedback to me on other topics.

I appreciate all points of view on this topic.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4550
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by Xan »

MediumTex wrote:
Xan wrote:My guess is that Rick (remember, he works in the industry) is with a company that relies on web ads for revenue.  That's the only thing I can think of that would explain his reluctance to install an ad blocker.
Rick may just be trying to be helpful to less sophisticated forum members/visitors (I would probably include myself in this group).

Rick has never provided anything but useful feedback to me on other topics.

I appreciate all points of view on this topic.
I hope what I said didn't come across as anti-Rick.  All his points are good.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by MediumTex »

Xan wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Xan wrote:My guess is that Rick (remember, he works in the industry) is with a company that relies on web ads for revenue.  That's the only thing I can think of that would explain his reluctance to install an ad blocker.
Rick may just be trying to be helpful to less sophisticated forum members/visitors (I would probably include myself in this group).

Rick has never provided anything but useful feedback to me on other topics.

I appreciate all points of view on this topic.
I hope what I said didn't come across as anti-Rick.  All his points are good.
I didn't think you were anti-Rick.

The only truly anti-Rick person I have ever known was Vyvyan:

Image
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15289
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by dualstow »

lol. I miss The Young Ones.
Especially Neil spilling his pot of food and exclaiming glumly, "Oh no. bad karma."
Google what he looks like now. Almost unrecognizable.

I'm glad Rick posted what he did. Even though I already have AdBlock, with plans to upgrade to CATblock (replaces ads with pictures of cats),
I learned a lot from the responses. If he hadn't kicked off the discussion, I'd still be in the dark.

Edited: typo only. Made a fricassee of the word "especially."
Last edited by dualstow on Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WHY IS PLATINUM UP LIKE 4½% TODAY
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by rickb »

Xan wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Xan wrote:My guess is that Rick (remember, he works in the industry) is with a company that relies on web ads for revenue.  That's the only thing I can think of that would explain his reluctance to install an ad blocker.
Rick may just be trying to be helpful to less sophisticated forum members/visitors (I would probably include myself in this group).

...
I hope what I said didn't come across as anti-Rick.  All his points are good.
MT hits the nail on the head here (for which he seems to have a knack). 

And if anyone's worried about offending me, don't (worry).  And, no, I don't work in web advertising.  Without getting too specific, lets call it internet communications.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by Pointedstick »

rickb wrote: And if anyone's worried about offending me, don't (worry).  And, no, I don't work in web advertising.  Without getting too specific, lets call it internet communications.
[align=center]Image
?

;)[/align]
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
l82start
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by l82start »

Xan wrote: My understanding is that ad blockers DO block Google Analytics.
they do with the addition of a privacy filter
-Government 2020+ - a BANANA REPUBLIC - if you can keep it

-Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence
dragoncar
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1111
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: Gold to $1050 next year?

Post by dragoncar »

There is a big difference between the site actively PROVIDING data to Google and including data in the pages it serves to us.  Which our browsers can provide to google if we let them.  The difference is that each user has complete control over whether their browser sends this data to google (as discussed above).

It does no service to "unsophisticated users" to leave this detail vague or inaccurate.
Post Reply