Mountaineer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:27 pm
Two Types of People
Points to ponder:
A. Is one Type better than the other?
B. Are both Types necessary?
C. Does evil have to exist in order to understand good, or vice versa?
D. Do people go back and forth between these two types, or just slide somewhere along the scale in only one direction?
E. What is today's reality like for each of the two Types?
F. Which Type has the potential for greater internal peace?
G. Do you know anyone who is purely a Type 1 or purely a Type 2, or are most people a blend of the two Types?
H. Which Type would you choose for your neighbor?
I. What is eternity like for each of the two Types? J. How do you know?
Type 1. Sees a painting and admires the way the images and colors make a beautiful whole.
Type 2. Sees a painting and individually examines each brush stroke and paint blob.
Type 1. Sees a forest and how it is different from the fields of wildflowers.
Type 2. Sees a collection of individual trees and after a long walk to the field sees individual petals, pistils, and stamen that some call flowers.
Type 1. Listens to a symphony and marvels at the composite sound that springs forth from the stage.
Type 2. Listens to a symphony and ponders why each individual note is buried in a collection of other notes.
Type 1. Listens to the news and detects a pattern emanating for the week or month.
Type 2. Listens to the news and is whipsawed hourly by the apparently differing stories.
Type 2. Reads the Bible literally, examines each verse on its own.
Type 1. Reads the Bible and understands how each of the 66 Books of differing genres contributes to understanding God (note: every time God is used in this post it refers to the Triune God - God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit) and that which He chooses to reveal.
Type 1. Reads the Bible interpreting the Old Testament through the lens of the New Testament.
Type 2. Reads the Bible interpreting the New Testament through the lens of the Old Testament.
Type 1. Reads the Bible with the primary hermeneutic of Scripture interprets Scripture and Scripture is about God (e.g. what does this tell me about God and how do the clear passages help interpret the less clear?).
Type 2. Reads the Bible with the primary hermeneutic of reading ones self into Scripture, it's about me (e.g. who/what is the Goliath in my life?)
Type 1. Reads the Bible and if a passage does not make sense, thinks "I am a fallen sinful creature and it is my lack of understanding the Creator that is the problem."
Type 2. Reads the Bible and if a passage does not make sense, thinks "how can you believe a God that is so mean, so cruel, that He would not make me like Him and able to understand why He says and does that?"
Type 1. Believes there is cognitive knowledge, knowledge gained by experience, and knowledge that must be revealed to sufficiently understand reality. There is absolute truth and it resides outside the individual.
Type 2. Believes there is cognitive knowledge, knowledge gained by experience, and only that which can be observed is real. There is no absolute truth, truth is relative and lies within the individual.
Type 1. Accepts that God is the Creator, thinks I am the creature and I do not want a God that is small enough to completely understand.
Type 2. Thinks that man, or the creation, is the glory of the universe and desires to create a god that is in man's image.
Type 1. Has faith in the promises of God and His Word.
Type 2. Has faith in self and the words and hypotheses of man.
Type 1. Believes everything is a gift from God.
Type 2. Believes everything results only as a consequence of personal effort.
Type 1. Examines the situation and says, "It is enough".
Type 2. Examines the situation and says, "I deserve more".
Type 1. Believes that entropy governs our world and those that inhabit it.
Type 2. Believes that man progressively gets better and better.
Type 1. Believes a culture of life, but life corrupted by sin on this side of our final day, is the the best explanation for the way things are.
Type 2. Believes a culture of death, built on the concept of survival of the fittest (Darwinism), is the best explanation for the way things are.