Wealth Preservation

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Re: Wealth Preservation

Post by BearBones »

KevinW wrote: 12.5% stock
12.5% T-bonds
12.5% gold
62.5% T-bills
I too am favoring something like this, perhaps with less cash, taking on and a bit more risk. I really appreciate the feedback, you all.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Wealth Preservation

Post by Pointedstick »

How about something whose worst year was still positive?

Image

It'll do okay in inflation due to the T-bills and gold, and the longer ladder gives you a few years of slightly better performance in deflation. And tight money recessions that are crushing everyone else will be a breeze.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Wealth Preservation

Post by Reub »

I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:

35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)

It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".

I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Wealth Preservation

Post by MediumTex »

Reub wrote: I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:

35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)

It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".

I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
A 50/50 stock/bond portfolio can be a lot more volatile than people realize.

I might think about something more like a Wellesley-ish allocation of 65% bonds, 35% stocks.

Just buying Wellesley seems to work pretty well for lots of people.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Alanw
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:05 am

Re: Wealth Preservation

Post by Alanw »

MediumTex wrote:
Reub wrote: I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:

35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)

It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".

I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
A 50/50 stock/bond portfolio can be a lot more volatile than people realize.

I might think about something more like a Wellesley-ish allocation of 65% bonds, 35% stocks.

Just buying Wellesley seems to work pretty well for lots of people.
I have done just what MT suggested.  80% PP, 20% Wellesley just to weight the total portfolio a little towards stocks and bonds.  Wellesley has an acceptable track record for my money and a cost of only .25%.  I don't care to manage that part of my portfolio for the minimal cost involved.  However, my PP is sepatate and subject to my conservative 30/20 rebalance bands.
Post Reply