I too am favoring something like this, perhaps with less cash, taking on and a bit more risk. I really appreciate the feedback, you all.KevinW wrote: 12.5% stock
12.5% T-bonds
12.5% gold
62.5% T-bills
Wealth Preservation
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Wealth Preservation
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Wealth Preservation
How about something whose worst year was still positive?

It'll do okay in inflation due to the T-bills and gold, and the longer ladder gives you a few years of slightly better performance in deflation. And tight money recessions that are crushing everyone else will be a breeze.

It'll do okay in inflation due to the T-bills and gold, and the longer ladder gives you a few years of slightly better performance in deflation. And tight money recessions that are crushing everyone else will be a breeze.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: Wealth Preservation
I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:
35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)
It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".
I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)
It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".
I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
Re: Wealth Preservation
A 50/50 stock/bond portfolio can be a lot more volatile than people realize.Reub wrote: I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:
35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)
It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".
I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
I might think about something more like a Wellesley-ish allocation of 65% bonds, 35% stocks.
Just buying Wellesley seems to work pretty well for lots of people.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: Wealth Preservation
I have done just what MT suggested. 80% PP, 20% Wellesley just to weight the total portfolio a little towards stocks and bonds. Wellesley has an acceptable track record for my money and a cost of only .25%. I don't care to manage that part of my portfolio for the minimal cost involved. However, my PP is sepatate and subject to my conservative 30/20 rebalance bands.MediumTex wrote:A 50/50 stock/bond portfolio can be a lot more volatile than people realize.Reub wrote: I just punched in my numbers on the B'head site in the "Three Fund Portfolio" thread. My situation is that I just recently retired at age 56 with a good federal pension (cost of living adjusted) and little debt. I answered a few questions related to risk tolerance and it recommended:
35% VTSMX (Total Stock Market Index)
15% VGTSX (Total International Index)
50% VBMFX (Total Bond)
It also stated that "Larger portfolios may benefit from adding TIPS, REIT, or a small-cap value fund in tax-deferred accounts".
I am about 80% into the PP and am considering this additional approach for the remaining funds.
I might think about something more like a Wellesley-ish allocation of 65% bonds, 35% stocks.
Just buying Wellesley seems to work pretty well for lots of people.