Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
Moderator: Global Moderator
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member

- Posts: 8885
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
There's a thought-provoking article exploring this premise over at the Volokh Conspiracy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volo ... m-tyranny/
The author is pretty well skewered by the commenters, and his premise suffers from presenting anecdotes rather than statistics, but it's still interesting reading nonetheless regardless of what side of the issue you're on.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volo ... m-tyranny/
The author is pretty well skewered by the commenters, and his premise suffers from presenting anecdotes rather than statistics, but it's still interesting reading nonetheless regardless of what side of the issue you're on.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
I don't think Americans have the cohesiveness to put together the country again should it ever fall apart. We're there to be a coup and we had guns all that would happen is that we would splinter into a bunch of different countries. I don't see Texas or Arizona ever willingly joining with Massachusetts or Connecticut again to restore our constitutional government.
All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone. - Blaise Pascal
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member

- Posts: 8885
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
I very strongly agree with this.doodle wrote: I don't think Americans have the cohesiveness to put together the country again should it ever fall apart. We're there to be a coup and we had guns all that would happen is that we would splinter into a bunch of different countries. I don't see Texas or Arizona ever willingly joining with Massachusetts or Connecticut again to restore our constitutional government.
However, I also see it as the best possible outcome.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
And that is a bad thing because?doodle wrote: I don't see Texas or Arizona ever willingly joining with Massachusetts or Connecticut again to restore our constitutional government.
Oops. PS beat me to it.
It was good being the party of Robin Hood. Until they morphed into the Sheriff of Nottingham
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
I didn't say it was a bad thing.....its just a thing-thing.
All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone. - Blaise Pascal
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
I tend to think of the US as like 5 Mini countries...
The northeast through the rust belt. (Ny, pa, oh, Maine, etc)
The southeast "rebel" states. (Ga, al, fl, tx, nc, etc)
The Midwest states (mn, ia, wi, etc)
The western "frontier" (id, mt, ut, co, az, ak etc)
The west coast (cali, or, wa, Hawaii too maybe)
Obviously, there could be some overlap. But if the shtf, I could see things shaking out sorta like this.
I think I'd still stay in MN. Especially now that we lost a lot of the "dead-beat" states that MN pays all the year through net federal outflows from our taxes
.
But back to the main post... Gun ownership by the general population has probably contributed to a lack of tyranny. However, I tend to think systems of checks and balances within government, as well as a robust legal process, tend to do a better job of that. But that assumes a different definition of tyranny than some here would agree with. Some think that any government is tyranny. That's fine, but it's going to change your answer or the reason for it.
The northeast through the rust belt. (Ny, pa, oh, Maine, etc)
The southeast "rebel" states. (Ga, al, fl, tx, nc, etc)
The Midwest states (mn, ia, wi, etc)
The western "frontier" (id, mt, ut, co, az, ak etc)
The west coast (cali, or, wa, Hawaii too maybe)
Obviously, there could be some overlap. But if the shtf, I could see things shaking out sorta like this.
I think I'd still stay in MN. Especially now that we lost a lot of the "dead-beat" states that MN pays all the year through net federal outflows from our taxes
But back to the main post... Gun ownership by the general population has probably contributed to a lack of tyranny. However, I tend to think systems of checks and balances within government, as well as a robust legal process, tend to do a better job of that. But that assumes a different definition of tyranny than some here would agree with. Some think that any government is tyranny. That's fine, but it's going to change your answer or the reason for it.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
The focus of this thread seems to be on tyranny by the government (i.e. 2nd Amendment). I agree that gun ownership by the general population contributes to a lack of government tyranny. I think it more widely has prevented much individual tyranny, i.e. the tyranny that is foisted upon the weak by the criminals. Perhaps that is one reason violent crime in the "wild, wild west" was lower than it is today. If you know I'm packin', perhaps you will think twice before wanting what is mine bad enough to risk your life.moda0306 wrote: I tend to think of the US as like 5 Mini countries...
The northeast through the rust belt. (Ny, pa, oh, Maine, etc)
The southeast "rebel" states. (Ga, al, fl, tx, nc, etc)
The Midwest states (mn, ia, wi, etc)
The western "frontier" (id, mt, ut, co, az, ak etc)
The west coast (cali, or, wa, Hawaii too maybe)
Obviously, there could be some overlap. But if the shtf, I could see things shaking out sorta like this.
I think I'd still stay in MN. Especially now that we lost a lot of the "dead-beat" states that MN pays all the year through net federal outflows from our taxes.
But back to the main post... Gun ownership by the general population has probably contributed to a lack of tyranny. However, I tend to think systems of checks and balances within government, as well as a robust legal process, tend to do a better job of that. But that assumes a different definition of tyranny than some here would agree with. Some think that any government is tyranny. That's fine, but it's going to change your answer or the reason for it.
... Mountaineer
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 6:23
Romans 6:23
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
Go ahead punk. Make my day! 
Last edited by Mountaineer on Tue Jun 24, 2014 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 6:23
Romans 6:23
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
Not. Even. Close.Desert wrote: I happened to snap a picture of Mountaineer earlier today, that I thought the rest of the forum would appreciate:
![]()
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
That is poor shot placement. Even a mediocre 1911 in the hands of a good marksman should produce a one inch group at that distance. 
My best 5 shot group from sandbags with a Ruger M77 varmint barrel in 6mm Remington at 100 yards - 5/16 inch center to center. Handloads, 38 grains IMR4895, 70 grain Sierra Match King.
... Mountaineer
My best 5 shot group from sandbags with a Ruger M77 varmint barrel in 6mm Remington at 100 yards - 5/16 inch center to center. Handloads, 38 grains IMR4895, 70 grain Sierra Match King.
... Mountaineer
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 6:23
Romans 6:23
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
We had a saying in the Army, "Speed is fine but accuracy is final".Mountaineer wrote: That is poor shot placement. Even a mediocre 1911 in the hands of a good marksman should produce a one inch group at that distance.
My best 5 shot group from sandbags with a Ruger M77 varmint barrel in 6mm Remington at 100 yards - 5/16 inch center to center. Handloads, 38 grains IMR4895, 70 grain Sierra Match King.
... Mountaineer
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
Leupold 6.5x20, March 1982 vintage.Desert wrote:That is some very nice shooting. What sort of scope do you have on that rifle?Mountaineer wrote: That is poor shot placement. Even a mediocre 1911 in the hands of a good marksman should produce a one inch group at that distance.
My best 5 shot group from sandbags with a Ruger M77 varmint barrel in 6mm Remington at 100 yards - 5/16 inch center to center. Handloads, 38 grains IMR4895, 70 grain Sierra Match King.
... Mountaineer
Another fun relatively reasonably priced target rifle is an Anschutz MPR64 22LR with a Weaver T36. Shoots one hole groups at 25 yards and about quarter inch groups most of the time at 50 yards. Wolf Match Extra, Eley Tenex, and Lapua Midas are the best I've found for that rifle.
... Mountaineer
Last edited by Mountaineer on Wed Jun 25, 2014 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 6:23
Romans 6:23
- Mountaineer
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5107
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am
Re: Does gun ownership actually prevent tyranny?
Eley Tenex - MV 1085 ft/sec. Speed of sound at sea level 1125 ft/sec. So, yes, barely.
... Mountaineer
Edited to include link, site may be of interest: http://www.accuratereloading.com/22rf.html
... Mountaineer
Edited to include link, site may be of interest: http://www.accuratereloading.com/22rf.html
Last edited by Mountaineer on Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
Romans 6:23
Romans 6:23