I was revisiting Harry Browne's radio show archives this morning and selected the 04-11-14.mp3 file at random.
That's November 14, 2004.
At 27:15, Greg from Portland asks, "I know you currently recommend the 6¼% treasury bond of 2030 ... I know a person shouldn't try to time the market, but wouldn't it be advisable to hold off buying the 6¼% bond?"
I'll keep this in mind every time I think about tinkering.
6¼ % long bond
Moderator: Global Moderator
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15219
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
6¼ % long bond
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
- Ad Orientem
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
- Location: Florida USA
- Contact:
Re: 6¼ % long bond
Interest rates back then were so low, they really had nowhere to go but up.
Everyone thought that was pretty obvious.
Everyone thought that was pretty obvious.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: 6¼ % long bond
Makes me wonder, is there a scenario where we could have a deflationary long bond? Not just in real terms, but in rate.MediumTex wrote: Interest rates back then were so low, they really had nowhere to go but up.
Everyone thought that was pretty obvious.
“Let every man divide his money into three parts, and invest a third in land, a third in business and a third let him keep by him in reserve.� ~Talmud
Re: 6¼ % long bond
Yeah, I wonder about that too. You would think that surely there would be a rate that was so low it had nowhere to go but up, but if we're not there yet, who knows?Bean wrote:Makes me wonder, is there a scenario where we could have a deflationary long bond? Not just in real terms, but in rate.MediumTex wrote: Interest rates back then were so low, they really had nowhere to go but up.
Everyone thought that was pretty obvious.
Re: 6¼ % long bond
Remember that the closer you get to zero, the harder it gets to push rates down further, which is part of the reason that you get such dramatic price moves in long term bonds at very low interest rates. If rates fell from 2.80% to 1.90%, it would generate huge long bond gains. Similarly, a rate move in the other direction will generate large losses.ns2 wrote:Yeah, I wonder about that too. You would think that surely there would be a rate that was so low it had nowhere to go but up, but if we're not there yet, who knows?Bean wrote:Makes me wonder, is there a scenario where we could have a deflationary long bond? Not just in real terms, but in rate.MediumTex wrote: Interest rates back then were so low, they really had nowhere to go but up.
Everyone thought that was pretty obvious.
Just visualize a tennis court turning into a ping pong table. As the court gets smaller, so do the rackets and the balls, but if anything the action gets more intense.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: 6¼ % long bond
What is this, a tennis court for ants???MediumTex wrote:Remember that the closer you get to zero, the harder it gets to push rates down further, which is part of the reason that you get such dramatic price moves in long term bonds at very low interest rates. If rates fell from 2.80% to 1.90%, it would generate huge long bond gains. Similarly, a rate move in the other direction will generate large losses.ns2 wrote:Yeah, I wonder about that too. You would think that surely there would be a rate that was so low it had nowhere to go but up, but if we're not there yet, who knows?Bean wrote: Makes me wonder, is there a scenario where we could have a deflationary long bond? Not just in real terms, but in rate.
Just visualize a tennis court turning into a ping pong table. As the court gets smaller, so do the rackets and the balls, but if anything the action gets more intense.
Re: 6¼ % long bond
Needs to be at least... three times bigger than this!dragoncar wrote:
What is this, a tennis court for ants???
“Let every man divide his money into three parts, and invest a third in land, a third in business and a third let him keep by him in reserve.� ~Talmud
Re: 6¼ % long bond
For those who haven't had the pleasure of seeing Zoolander (start watching at 1:00):Bean wrote:Needs to be at least... three times bigger than this!dragoncar wrote:
What is this, a tennis court for ants???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ-8IuUkJJc