Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Ad Orientem »

Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8885
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Pointedstick »

Great videos. That host lady, though. Man. Classic case of trying to imply public support for your personal bias by wondering out loud if "some people" might disagree.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8885
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Pointedstick »

Celebrity doctor Sanjay Gupta agrees: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/0 ... 25380.html
I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have "no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse."

They didn't have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn't have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications. In fact, sometimes marijuana is the only thing that works.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Libertarian666 »

Pointedstick wrote: Celebrity doctor Sanjay Gupta agrees: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/0 ... 25380.html
I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have "no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse."

They didn't have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn't have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications. In fact, sometimes marijuana is the only thing that works.
Their actual reasoning is: if weed were legal, the DEA would pretty much be out of business.
User avatar
Jan Van
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:42 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Jan Van »

Libertarian666 wrote: Their actual reasoning is: if weed were legal, the DEA would pretty much be out of business.
And how many of the current prison population is in there for weed-related issues?
"Well, if you're gonna sin you might as well be original" -- Mike "The Cool-Person"
"Yeah, well, that’s just, like, your opinion, man" -- The Dude
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8885
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Pointedstick »

The private prison industry would certainly take a hit, too. Not to mention local law enforcement and prosecutors flush with federal cash.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by MediumTex »

Pointedstick wrote: The private prison industry would certainly take a hit, too. Not to mention local law enforcement and prosecutors flush with federal cash.
Judges
Prosecutors
Defense Attorneys
Probation Officers
Bailbond Companies
Prison Guards
Prison Contractors
Police Officers

It's sort like the military-industrial complex, except rather than bombs, it's bongs.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Libertarian666 »

MediumTex wrote:
Pointedstick wrote: The private prison industry would certainly take a hit, too. Not to mention local law enforcement and prosecutors flush with federal cash.
Judges
Prosecutors
Defense Attorneys
Probation Officers
Bailbond Companies
Prison Guards
Prison Contractors
Police Officers

It's sort like the military-industrial complex, except rather than bombs, it's bongs jails.
Fixed it for you.  :(
RuralEngineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by RuralEngineer »

I think their time is running out. People are getting fed up and I think I'll see legalization in the next 10 years.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8885
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Pointedstick »

I agree, RE. The big question in my mind is whether we're going to have real, actual federal legalization like we did for alcohol after prohibition, or license-and-regulate-it-to-death "legalization".
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Jan Van
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:42 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Jan Van »

Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Why I changed my mind on weed
I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have "no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse.
They didn't have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn't have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications.
Nice to see people change their mind after actually looking into the subject...
"Well, if you're gonna sin you might as well be original" -- Mike "The Cool-Person"
"Yeah, well, that’s just, like, your opinion, man" -- The Dude
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by Ad Orientem »

Pointedstick wrote: I agree, RE. The big question in my mind is whether we're going to have real, actual federal legalization like we did for alcohol after prohibition, or license-and-regulate-it-to-death "legalization".
For the harder drugs I'd like it treated the way we treat smoking. Regulate who can sell and buy it (no one under 18). And bar its use in pubic and quasi public environments along with commercial advertising. Then use some of the massive saved money on education and drug treatment programs.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
RuralEngineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Some Clarity on the War on Drugs

Post by RuralEngineer »

As long as I'm not responsible in any way, shape, or form for people's poor decisions and the negative consequences are localized to that individual, go nuts.
Post Reply