California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
FWIW, I find the conventional conservative and liberal political narratives in this country to be equally distasteful.
The liberal company line bugs me because it places such faith in government to make the right decisions about how society's resources should be allocated.
The conservative company line bugs me because it is so hypocritical in the way it attacks liberals for being in favor of "big government."
I agree that there are probably more right leaning people here than left leaning people, but I hope that the forum provides a platform for whatever point of view someone wants to share without fear of being shouted down by people on the other side of an issue.
The liberal company line bugs me because it places such faith in government to make the right decisions about how society's resources should be allocated.
The conservative company line bugs me because it is so hypocritical in the way it attacks liberals for being in favor of "big government."
I agree that there are probably more right leaning people here than left leaning people, but I hope that the forum provides a platform for whatever point of view someone wants to share without fear of being shouted down by people on the other side of an issue.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
I certainly find the economic discussions regarding QE and monetary theory here to be far more balanced than any political stereotype would indicate. On a fundamentally financial forum, that's what really counts.
The rest is just entertainment. ; )
The rest is just entertainment. ; )
- Ad Orientem
- Executive Member

- Posts: 3483
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
- Location: Florida USA
- Contact:
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
While the historical figures are interesting they don't have much bearing on modern California. The Dems currently have super-majorities in both houses of the state legislature and the Governor is a Democrat, albeit a moderate. Likewise the last couple of GOP Governors would have been considered center-left Democrats in much of the rest of the country.This is at least in part the consequence of changing population demographics. But suggesting that California is anything other than a blue state because there are some sparsely populated corners of red is like saying that Texas isn't really all that red, just look at Houston!rocketdog wrote:I lived in CA for 13 years, and everybody always thinks it's a heavily blue state, yet here is the pattern of governors over the past 70 years:Ad Orientem wrote:This is California. It's a one party state (always a bad thing)
That's a total of 48 years in office for the Republicans, but only 22 years in office for the Democrats. That's more than a 2-to-1 ratio!Code: Select all
Democrat 2011- Republican 2003-2011 Democrat 1999-2003 Republican 1991-1999 Republican 1983-1991 Democrat 1975-1983 Republican 1967-1975 Democrat 1959-1967 Republican 1953-1959 Republican 1943-1953
People think CA is a liberal bastion, but that's only true in highly visible pockets like L.A. and San Francisco. Overall it's a red-leaning state. After all, Prop 8 never would have even gotten on the ballot in a blue-dominant state, let alone get passed.
The Republican Party in California is an endangered species.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
-
Libertarian666
- Executive Member

- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
I think you mean "Austin".Ad Orientem wrote:
But suggesting that California is anything other than a blue state because there are some sparsely populated corners of red is like saying that Texas isn't really all that red, just look at Houston!
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member

- Posts: 8885
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
It's easy to underestimate the pull of large urban areas. Between LA + suburbs, San Jose, San Francisco, and the rest of the SF bay area, that's 18 million people, or half the entire state population. These areas are massively, overwhelmingly liberal areas. These places send liberals to the state legislature with 75% majorities year after year. California's conservative areas are not nearly conservative enough to make up for any of this, which is why, as Ad Orientem pointed out, the legislature has a Democratic supermajority and our Republican governors would look like center-left in any other state.KevinW wrote:Yeah, I've tried to make that point here too, with little success. LA and San Francisco are very left-leaning, but outside those two metroplexes California is a conservative Western state.rocketdog wrote: People think CA is a liberal bastion, but that's only true in highly visible pockets like L.A. and San Francisco. Overall it's a red-leaning state. After all, Prop 8 never would have even gotten on the ballot in a blue-dominant state, let alone get passed.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
-
edsanville
- Executive Member

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 12:36 am
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
I remember looking at maps of election results by counties, and you could pick out most cities within most states, just by looking for the small blue spots. It works pretty much everywhere except New England (my neighbors Vermont and Maine are crazy rural hippies who vote Democrat every time), Utah, and the Great Plains.
I made a scatter plot showing the Democrat-Urban correlation by state:

I made a scatter plot showing the Democrat-Urban correlation by state:
Pointedstick wrote:It's easy to underestimate the pull of large urban areas. Between LA + suburbs, San Jose, San Francisco, and the rest of the SF bay area, that's 18 million people, or half the entire state population. These areas are massively, overwhelmingly liberal areas. These places send liberals to the state legislature with 75% majorities year after year. California's conservative areas are not nearly conservative enough to make up for any of this, which is why, as Ad Orientem pointed out, the legislature has a Democratic supermajority and our Republican governors would look like center-left in any other state.KevinW wrote:Yeah, I've tried to make that point here too, with little success. LA and San Francisco are very left-leaning, but outside those two metroplexes California is a conservative Western state.rocketdog wrote: People think CA is a liberal bastion, but that's only true in highly visible pockets like L.A. and San Francisco. Overall it's a red-leaning state. After all, Prop 8 never would have even gotten on the ballot in a blue-dominant state, let alone get passed.
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
I've always found the Silicon Valley democrats to be a curious breed, as IMO their behavior often opposes their stated politics. Just one example -- You'll never see a software engineer seek to organize a union in Silicon Valley, as that would destroy their own marketability in a very competitive and lucrative engineering marketplace. And if that ever happened, the startup entrepreneurs would flee in droves.Pointedstick wrote: It's easy to underestimate the pull of large urban areas. Between LA + suburbs, San Jose, San Francisco, and the rest of the SF bay area, that's 18 million people, or half the entire state population. These areas are massively, overwhelmingly liberal areas.
The immigrants I knew in Silicon Valley tended to vote Republican, while the natives voted heavily Democratic (or at least stated so publicly). Honestly, I think at some point politics just becomes a social thing for people rather than an issue-driven choice.
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
At some point? I tend to think that this is what it is at its core.Tyler wrote:I've always found the Silicon Valley democrats to be a curious breed, as IMO their behavior often opposes their stated politics. Just one example -- You'll never see a software engineer seek to organize a union in Silicon Valley, as that would destroy their own marketability in a very competitive and lucrative engineering marketplace. And if that ever happened, the startup entrepreneurs would flee in droves.Pointedstick wrote: It's easy to underestimate the pull of large urban areas. Between LA + suburbs, San Jose, San Francisco, and the rest of the SF bay area, that's 18 million people, or half the entire state population. These areas are massively, overwhelmingly liberal areas.
The immigrants I knew in Silicon Valley tended to vote Republican, while the natives voted heavily Democratic (or at least stated so publicly). Honestly, I think at some point politics just becomes a social thing for people rather than an issue-driven choice.
The exception is when you see an actual well-thought-out issue debate take place. It often much more resembles arguing why your team is better.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."
- Thomas Paine
- Thomas Paine
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
National Republicans from 20+ years look like center left Democrats now.Pointedstick wrote:It's easy to underestimate the pull of large urban areas. Between LA + suburbs, San Jose, San Francisco, and the rest of the SF bay area, that's 18 million people, or half the entire state population. These areas are massively, overwhelmingly liberal areas. These places send liberals to the state legislature with 75% majorities year after year. California's conservative areas are not nearly conservative enough to make up for any of this, which is why, as Ad Orientem pointed out, the legislature has a Democratic supermajority and our Republican governors would look like center-left in any other state.KevinW wrote:Yeah, I've tried to make that point here too, with little success. LA and San Francisco are very left-leaning, but outside those two metroplexes California is a conservative Western state.rocketdog wrote: People think CA is a liberal bastion, but that's only true in highly visible pockets like L.A. and San Francisco. Overall it's a red-leaning state. After all, Prop 8 never would have even gotten on the ballot in a blue-dominant state, let alone get passed.
Some might even say its not Californians leaving the Republican Party, but the Repubs leaving Californians. Why the various reforms of election laws to try to get more centrists politicians (from both parties.) Open primaries. Ranked choice voting. ....
Lots of fiscally centrist/conservative, environmentalists, socially liberal folks around (although not sure why its conservative to not regulate commerce and to legislate the private lives of citizens....)
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
Most states, including California, look like a microcosm of the US to me. Like fractals, you can zoom in on a 2012 presidential map and see the islands of blue in seas of red.
Re: California Debates How to Blow Tax Windfall
Not so fast: that's what everybody said about the Whigs and Tories. Oh, wait...Ad Orientem wrote:The Republican Party in California is an endangered species.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
- H. L. Mencken
