Helpful explanation of the term "food toxin"

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Benko
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:40 am

Helpful explanation of the term "food toxin"

Post by Benko »

From Kessler's newsletter this morning:

In their book The Perfect Health Diet, Paul & Shou-Ching Jaminet apply the economic principle of declining marginal benefits to toxins:

    It implies that the first bit eaten of any toxin has low toxicity. Each additional bit is slightly more toxic than the bit before. At higher doses, the toxicity of each bit continues to increase, so that the toxin is increasingly poisonous. ( The Perfect Health Diet )
It was good being the party of Robin Hood. Until they morphed into the Sheriff of Nottingham
FarmerD
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:37 pm

Re: Helpful explanation of the term "food toxin"

Post by FarmerD »

Benko wrote: From Kessler's newsletter this morning:

In their book The Perfect Health Diet, Paul & Shou-Ching Jaminet apply the economic principle of declining marginal benefits to toxins:

    It implies that the first bit eaten of any toxin has low toxicity. Each additional bit is slightly more toxic than the bit before. At higher doses, the toxicity of each bit continues to increase, so that the toxin is increasingly poisonous. ( The Perfect Health Diet )
In toxicology textbooks, the phrase "The dose makes the poison" is a guiding principle.  Basically everything is toxic if taken in a high enough dose.  This principle has been accepted for hundreds of years.  That's why I'm always stunned to read some rodent study where the rodent was given 10,000 times the dose they could ever realistically get, then the researchers attempt to extrapolate the hazard that occurs at much lower and realistic exposures.  Many supposedly knowledgeable researchers as well as the EPA, Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission among other government goofballs, insist on a linear no threshold dose which completely contradicts common sense. 
Post Reply