Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
RuralEngineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:26 pm

Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by RuralEngineer »

I hadn't ever heard of this, but apparently back around 2000 a man took a test and was rejected from the police force for having too high an IQ.  He filed an appeal and lost...twice.  So many things make sense now....
Jordan, a 49-year-old college graduate, took the exam in 1996 and scored 33 points, the equivalent of an IQ of 125. But New London police interviewed only candidates who scored 20 to 27, on the theory that those who scored too high could get bored with police work and leave soon after undergoing costly training.

Most Cops Just Above Normal The average score nationally for police officers is 21 to 22, the equivalent of an IQ of 104, or just a little above average.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barr ... Yc6D8o24pr
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15581
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by dualstow »

Still above average, though.
The last line in that article is baffling!
No money in our jackets and our jeans are torn/
your hands are cold but your lips are warm
_ . /
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by MediumTex »

I love this story.  I remember reading about it a year or two ago.

Think of the challenges involved in doing a test preparation course for this exam.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by MachineGhost »

Does below average IQ actually exist in reality as a bell curve?  I'm skeptical.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by rocketdog »

MachineGhost wrote: Does below average IQ actually exist in reality as a bell curve?  I'm skeptical.
Of course it does.  Anything that can be measured over time or across multiple samples has an average.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by MachineGhost »

What I meant was I'm skeptical the bell curve is symmetrical to the left of the average IQ as to the right.  Do we really have as many people to the left as to the right?  It just doesn't seem to vibe with reality.  It cannot be a Gaussian distribution.  I think there is more likely to be a massive concentration around the middle that cliff dives off just slightly to the left of 100 IQ, but only gradually declines to the right of 100 IQ.

In other words, people below 100 IQ are mentally challenged and I don't see that we have a massive population of them (autistic? disabled?) symetrically equivalent in numbers to those with above average and genius IQ's.  Stupidity is not the same thing as low IQ.  I have an above average IQ, yet I'm stupid at times as anyone can tell from my posts.

I feel like I'm turning into a doodle.  Time for a break from the forum!
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
rocketdog
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:35 pm

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by rocketdog »

Who said that 100 was an average IQ?  The average IQ is whatever it is.  I guess we'll never know since you can't give everyone in the world an IQ test, and there are known socio-economic flaws in IQ tests. 
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
- H. L. Mencken
rickb
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:12 am

Re: Appeals Court Rules Legal to Bar High IQ Cops

Post by rickb »

rocketdog wrote: Who said that 100 was an average IQ?  The average IQ is whatever it is.  I guess we'll never know since you can't give everyone in the world an IQ test, and there are known socio-economic flaws in IQ tests.
IQ tests are normalized so that within any tested population the average score is 100 with a standard deviation of 15 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient) - this pretty much means the average IQ is 100 by definition.  Note I'm not saying if you gave a particular test to everyone in the world and used its current scoring metric the average would be 100 - but that if you gave a test to everyone in the world the scoring metric would be adjusted to make sure the average is 100.
Post Reply