Gosso wrote:
Do you give an credence to the possibility of the planets containing a sort of advanced consciousness? Maybe the hexagonal symbol was presented through a dream or vision and then incorporated into religions and other symbolism. Saturn is trying to get our attention.
That's entirely possible! But who knows. I just think it's fascinating how the planets are so closely associated with our ancient myths and pantheons. Even the days of the week are named after the planets/deities:
Sunday (Domingo): Sun's day / God's day
Monday (Lunes): Moon's day
Tuesday (Martes): Tiu's day (Germanic) / Mars's day (Roman)
Wednesday (Miercoles): Woden's day (Germanic) / Mercury's day (Roman)
Thursday (Jueves): Thor's day (Germanic) / Jupiter's day (Roman)
Friday (Viernes): Freya's or Frigg's day (Germanic) / Venus's day (Roman)
Saturday (Sabado): Saturn's day (Roman)
Some people don't think much of this close relationship between our ancient gods and the planets. They just say, "Well of course people back then were interested in celestial objects. It's natural that, lacking modern science, they would have looked at them with a sense of supernatural awe and worshipped them." End of story--or so they say.
But I think the real story goes a little deeper than that. As the ancient hermetic doctrine says, "As above, so below." In other words, in a very real sense, the mind of man reflects the cosmos and the cosmos reflects the mind of man. If that notion is true, it might explain why so many civilizations and cultures across the globe have had eerily similar myths over the ages: they have been reflecting the same cosmos in slightly different ways, like a single beam of white light scattered into different colors when passing through a prism.
Yes, the legends of the gods are reflections of our own inner symbols and archetypes. But I think those symbols and archetypes may also be closely related to the evolution and movements of key celestial objects. That is the thesis of an interesting book from 1969 I'm currently reading called
Hamlet's Mill by Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend.
Gosso wrote:
An ancient civilization could be possible, but I still want to find some bones with carbon dating to back it up. Unless the Earth was previous inhabited by intelligent beings that wouldn't leave much of a trace (other than the pyramids and whatnot).
Maybe when the next cataclysmic crustal displacement occurs and the 2-mile-thick ice cover over Antarctica melts away as the continent is yanked north, those remains will be uncovered
I'm really not sure what traces would be left behind by a civilization from over 10,000 years ago. The bones and other evidence may be out there somewhere--but it would most likely be buried
really deeply. And who knows where to start digging? Archaeologists still periodically dig up new finds at sites we've known about for centuries--Giza, etc. Think about how many other mind-blowing archaeological wonders are still out there, underground, because nobody in the world even knows they exist, let alone where to start digging for them?