Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5089
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Mountaineer »

Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
User avatar
Benko
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:40 am

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Benko »

W.H. Petition Calls for Stripping Citizenship and Exile for Anyone Who Signs Petition to Secede

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/wh- ... 63282.html
It was good being the party of Robin Hood. Until they morphed into the Sheriff of Nottingham
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Pointedstick »

Calling it a "W.H. Petition" is deliberately misleading, and implies that this is Obama's idea. Every petition on change.org--including the silly secessionist ones--are "W.H. Petitions" submitted by the random people who create them.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5089
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Mountaineer »

We (the United States) do seem to be more divided than at any time in my memory.  Maybe it is just because I have more time to pay attention to political theater than previously?  Would it not be refreshing to have a government that is interested in pulling us all back together toward an inspiring vision of the future rather than enacting more "squashing" regulations on us?  Right!  When pigs fly .............
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Pointedstick »

How do you pull together people who fundamentally disagree? That's sort of the problem with representative forms of government the larger they get the the more diverse the voters become, IMHO.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Ad Orientem »

Great. That's just was the GOP needs when large numbers of people are already conflating the term "conservative" with wacky nut-job.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by moda0306 »

Pointedstick wrote: How do you pull together people who fundamentally disagree? That's sort of the problem with representative forms of government the larger they get the the more diverse the voters become, IMHO.
Yes.  Thank God these states do such a better job in fairly negotiating the differences in opinion between their diverse set of voters than the feds.

Oh wait...

:)

Totally sarcastic and dickish sounding, I know... I really just couldn't help make a quip. 
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Pointedstick »

I tend to think that most of the states do an equally bad job within their borders! Thankfully, at least there are 50 of them so I have some semblance of choice as to whose set of bad policies I want to be subject to. And because of the diversity of human opinions, your definition of bad policies might be my definition of good policies! That's why the states have such diverse tax rates, business laws, support for public wilderness areas, gun policies, immigration policies, subsidies for higher education, you name it.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Tortoise
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:35 am

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Tortoise »

These current secession rumblings are clearly kind of silly, but I see them as just the tip of a very large iceberg.

As U.S. whites of European ancestry continue their trajectory toward becoming a minority, expect the secession issue to become larger and more heated. Although the mainstream media doesn't usually discuss our nation's growing division in racial terms, that's one of the biggest causal factors. As the U.S. has become less racially homogeneous over the past half-century or so, the nation has become increasingly divided both culturally and politically.
RuralEngineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by RuralEngineer »

When the angered masses march openly in the streets armed, I'll take them seriously.  Until then they're just disgruntled individuals taking advantage of the convenient platform that is the internet...like me.  We're as close to a state or states seceding as we have ever been in the last 100 years.  Which is to say, not very close at all.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15365
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by dualstow »

I would like to extend an invitation to MT to visit me in the United States if this goes down. Just make sure you have permission from President Perry*, and get a passport!



*Ok, Perry has pooh-poohed the secession talk recently.
I WOULD NEVER DELETE GARRETT
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Ad Orientem »

The Confederacy of Takers...
President Obama’s opponents have unwittingly come up with a brilliant plan to avoid the “fiscal cliff.”? They want to secede from the union.

If Obama were serious about being a good steward of the nation’s finances, he’d let them.

The White House, in one of those astro-turf efforts that make people feel warm about small-d democracy, launched a “We the People”? program on its Web site last year, allowing Americans to petition their government for a redress of grievances. Any petition that receives 25,000 or more signatures within 30 days is promised a response (though not necessarily a favorable one) from the Obama administration.

And so a large number of patriotic Americans, mostly from states won by Mitt Romney last week, have petitioned the White House to let them secede. They should be careful about what they wish for. It would be excellent financial news for those of us left behind if Obama were to grant a number of the rebel states their wish “to withdraw from the United States and create [their] own NEW government”? (the petitions emphasize “new”? by capitalizing it).

Red states receive, on average, far more from the federal government in expenditures than they pay in taxes. The balance is the opposite in blue states. The secession petitions, therefore, give the opportunity to create what would be, in a fiscal sense, a far more perfect union.
Read the rest here...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
WiseOne
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2692
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:08 am

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by WiseOne »

Interestingly, New York and New Jersey are on the list of states petitioning for secession.

I admit having thought for years that dumping the deep South would be one of the healthiest fiscal maneuvers the rest of us could make.  Eliminating the core of the religious extremists as well as a big sinkhole for federal tax dollars in one fell swoop!  I wish fiscal conservatism didn't have to be tied together to the Scopes Monkey Trial gang.

Remember this website from 2004?  Can't believe it's still up.  Rated PG-13 for language.

http://www.fuckthesouth.com/
Last edited by WiseOne on Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15365
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by dualstow »

WiseOne wrote:
Remember this website from 2004?  Can't believe it's still up.  Rated PG-13 for language.

http://www.fuckthesouth.com/
hahaha, wow!
I WOULD NEVER DELETE GARRETT
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Shades of South Carolina - 1861

Post by Gumby »

Yeah. Seriously, let them secede.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
Post Reply