probability of PP losses next year.

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
atrchi
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:52 pm

probability of PP losses next year.

Post by atrchi »

Hello,

I understand the PP has not had a losing year since 1982 or so.

This reminds me that San Francisco has not had a devastating earthquake since 1908.

That got me wondering.

Using purely statistical methods, like those used to predict earthquakes, what is the probability the PP will lose money next year?

e.g. When you google "probability of earthquake next year" you'll find stuff like this: :o

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/ja ... four-years
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by craigr »

There are no guarantees with investing. Best you can do is widely diversify because nobody knows what may or may not happen. Past returns can disprove theories, but can't prove them going forward. Something could happen that would impact the portfolio assets all at once and cause a large loss, but then again most other portfolios are probably in the same boat.
Last edited by craigr on Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jimbojones
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by jimbojones »

Using the PP return data on the website, the arithmetic mean return is 9.945% with a standard deviation of 7.99%.  A return of 0% is 1.244 standard deviations below the mean.  That roughly translates to the 10.7th percentile.  So from a purely statistical perspective, I'd say there's a 10.7% chance of a negative nominal return.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4547
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Xan »

Are PP returns normally distributed, though?
User avatar
jimbojones
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by jimbojones »

Xan wrote: Are PP returns normally distributed, though?
It isn't perfect, but the returns are bell-shaped.  I made a histogram and I'd post the picture here, but I don't know how.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Pointedstick »

If you don't already have an image file of your histogram, take a screenshot of your screen. Crop the resulting file with software of your choice (GIMP, Preview, etc.). Upload the file to http://imgur.com/. Copy the URL to your image, and head back here to make a new post. Click on the little picture icon on the button bar, and paste the URL between the IMG and /IMG tags that appear. Voila!
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Gumby »

While it's not a guarantee, when the permanent portfolio had a bad year, it was always preceded and followed by years with greater than 10% nominal returns.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
jimbojones
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by jimbojones »

Image

Thanks for the tip, Pointedstick!
TripleB
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by TripleB »

The problem is choosing the end points of the year.

Your question is based on the common fallacy of caring about what happens from Jan 1 through Dec 31.

If you look at 2008/2009, the PP did something like +0.2% one of those years (I forgot which was the really bad one).

However, Long Term Treasuries bonds gained around 40% in the last 2 months of that bad year. Thus, if you calculated a year return as from Oct 1 through Sep 31st of that time period, the PP might have been down 15% (I don't know, I'm speculating/estimating). It was carried by LTTs in the last couple of months for that calendar annual year.

Since you're interested (or should be interested) in holding the PP for a long period of time, then it shouldn't matter.
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Ad Orientem »

If you flip a coin once a day for forty years, and every day it come up heads, what are your statistical odds of it coming up tails tomorrow? 50/50. The future is unpredictable. If you're using the PP for all or most of your money, yes you will have an occasional down year. History suggests that those down years will be rare and shallow. So relax and enjoy the ride.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Mark Leavy »

Ad Orientem wrote: If you flip a coin once a day for forty years, and every day it come up heads, what are your statistical odds of it coming up tails tomorrow? 50/50.
Or as Fat Tony would say, "That coin’s gotta be loaded. . .”?  and bet appropriately.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludic_fallacy
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by craigr »

Mark Leavy wrote:
Ad Orientem wrote: If you flip a coin once a day for forty years, and every day it come up heads, what are your statistical odds of it coming up tails tomorrow? 50/50.
Or as Fat Tony would say, "That coin’s gotta be loaded. . .”?  and bet appropriately.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludic_fallacy
Amen! In investing the odds are not that of a casino. Your primary defense is wide diversification, and even then it can't guarantee against all negative outcomes. It can just put the odds (!) in your favor that something very bad happening in this world won't wipe you out entirely. There are no guarantees in investing!
User avatar
jimbojones
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by jimbojones »

TripleB wrote: The problem is choosing the end points of the year.

Your question is based on the common fallacy of caring about what happens from Jan 1 through Dec 31.

If you look at 2008/2009, the PP did something like +0.2% one of those years (I forgot which was the really bad one).

However, Long Term Treasuries bonds gained around 40% in the last 2 months of that bad year. Thus, if you calculated a year return as from Oct 1 through Sep 31st of that time period, the PP might have been down 15% (I don't know, I'm speculating/estimating). It was carried by LTTs in the last couple of months for that calendar annual year.

Since you're interested (or should be interested) in holding the PP for a long period of time, then it shouldn't matter.
I used a sample size of 40, which should be enough.  Adding hundreds of additional samples will improve the data but the results shouldn't be materially different.  I thought I saw that someone ran the histogram over rolling 12-month periods, but maybe that wasn't on this site.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by MediumTex »

jimbojones wrote:
TripleB wrote: The problem is choosing the end points of the year.

Your question is based on the common fallacy of caring about what happens from Jan 1 through Dec 31.

If you look at 2008/2009, the PP did something like +0.2% one of those years (I forgot which was the really bad one).

However, Long Term Treasuries bonds gained around 40% in the last 2 months of that bad year. Thus, if you calculated a year return as from Oct 1 through Sep 31st of that time period, the PP might have been down 15% (I don't know, I'm speculating/estimating). It was carried by LTTs in the last couple of months for that calendar annual year.

Since you're interested (or should be interested) in holding the PP for a long period of time, then it shouldn't matter.
I used a sample size of 40, which should be enough.  Adding hundreds of additional samples will improve the data but the results shouldn't be materially different.  I thought I saw that someone ran the histogram over rolling 12-month periods, but maybe that wasn't on this site.
Is there another site looking at the PP at the molecular level?

I thought it was just us.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4547
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by Xan »

I think that rolling 12-months thing was on this forum; I remember seeing that, but I don't know where exactly.
User avatar
jimbojones
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: probability of PP losses next year.

Post by jimbojones »

Turns out the rolling 12-month graph was from the "Sorry guys, I broke PP" thread:

http://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/in ... ic=3384.60

Slotine's graph only went back to 2000, but it would be interesting to see 40 years of rolling 12-month data. 
Post Reply