Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by craigr »

Well the end is near and the 4x25 portfolio was in the +15-16% range for the year. Numbers will fluctuate slightly as end of year dividends, etc. roll into the funds. But it's close enough for government work. Here is my write-up:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160324133 ... 0-results/

Happy New Year!
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by moda0306 »

One more year, and we'll officially have 40 years of proof that the PP is as amazing as we all hope/know/think it is.

Congrats everyone.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
bigamish
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:35 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by bigamish »

Just my luck that I only was able to complete the establishment of my PP last week. Here's hoping that 2011 is just as good!
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by Gumby »

moda0306 wrote: One more year, and we'll officially have 40 years of proof that the PP is as amazing as we all hope/know/think it is.

Congrats everyone.
Congrats to everyone. Harry Browne would be proud of the PP living on here in cyberspace.

btw, moda0306, we already have a 40 year proof. Harry Browne's chart of the PP shows results from 1970.

Here's to 40 years!
Last edited by Gumby on Sat Jan 01, 2011 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
Lone Wolf
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by Lone Wolf »

Another great year.  Thanks for the update, Craig, and congratulations all!
gonetowindsurf
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:46 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by gonetowindsurf »

Craigr - you mentioned rebalancing gold in your blog posting. Can you please elaborate? My guess would be that those who purchased as late as 09 would need to rebalance, and those that have been in for 5 years would have rebalanced at least twice now - and would that money go into cash - because none of the other assets reached the lower band?
thanks
mike
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by MediumTex »

gonetowindsurf wrote: Craigr - you mentioned rebalancing gold in your blog posting. Can you please elaborate? My guess would be that those who purchased as late as 09 would need to rebalance, and those that have been in for 5 years would have rebalanced at least twice now - and would that money go into cash - because none of the other assets reached the lower band?
thanks
mike
When one asset hits a rebalancing point, you rebalance the entire portfolio.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: Permanent Portfolio 2010 Results

Post by craigr »

gonetowindsurf wrote: Craigr - you mentioned rebalancing gold in your blog posting. Can you please elaborate? My guess would be that those who purchased as late as 09 would need to rebalance, and those that have been in for 5 years would have rebalanced at least twice now - and would that money go into cash - because none of the other assets reached the lower band?
thanks
mike
Unfortunately rebalancing is going to also be portfolio dependent varying on tax situations, etc. But I mention gold as a friendly nudge that people should rebalance it if it is too high. Of all the assets, gold has the most emotional attachment for many. They either hate it or they are getting panicked about the news and won't sell it.

What I am suggesting is that if you have hit the upper band, you sell it down to 25% and use the proceeds to buy up your laggards whichever they may be in your portfolio. It's going to be time dependent. For some, the stocks may still be lagging. For others it may be the LT bonds. For others still the cash.

As Tex said, you can rebalance the entire thing, but if you are taxable you may not want to do this outright. You could instead just take the gold profits and buy up the biggest loser, second loser, etc. until depleted and limit sales in assets that are in between. There isn't necessarily a one size fits all solution. You need to evaluate your own position and make a decision.

But I mention gold because it has gone up a lot for most people following the portfolio and I suspect many are at, or very near, the upper band. They should rebalance if needed.
Last edited by craigr on Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply