The Intangible Costs of ETF Ownership

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

The Intangible Costs of ETF Ownership

Post by Ad Orientem »

Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
User avatar
Tortoise
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:35 am

Re: The Intangible Costs of ETF Ownership

Post by Tortoise »

If I understood the article correctly, the author's main thesis is that aside from the expense ratio, ETFs have two "intangible costs":
  • Bid-ask spread
  • Index tracking error
For buy-and-hold investors who trade only infrequently, the bid-ask spread is essentially a non-issue.

As for index tracking error, who would ever consider that a "cost"? It's random noise. If the tracking error is consistently negative, seeming never to revert to the mean, then perhaps that's really just an example of bid-ask spread in disguise. Maybe the fund management is trading illiquid securities in the portfolio often enough actually to cause a downward drag relative to the target index.

I just thought the author's inclusion of index tracking error as an "intangible cost" of ETF ownership might be a bit misleading. Maybe a better example of an intangible cost would have been portfolio turnover since higher-turnover funds tend to result in investors getting slapped with higher tax bills (even ignoring the costs of bid-ask spread in the presence of high turnover).
Post Reply