Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Gosso
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 am
Location: Canada

Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gosso »

"100 Billion Euros!"
Image

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012 ... talks.html

[quote=CBC]Spain will ask for a bank bailout from Europe, becoming the fourth and largest country to seek help since the single currency bloc's debt crisis erupted.

Economy Minister Luis de Guindos said Saturday the aid will go to the banking sector only and so would not come with new austerity conditions attached for the economy in general.[/quote]

Disengage LTT?  Engage gold and stocks?

Also the comment section in that article is quite funny.  Here's a small sidebar: are banks receiving too much blame for the economic problems...after all, it takes two to make a loan, the bank and a willing individual/business.
Last edited by Gosso on Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gumby »

Gosso wrote:Disengage LTT?  Engage gold and stocks?
Not so fast... For an interesting bear argument, see ZeroHedge:

ZH: Spain IS Greece After All: Here Are The Main Outstanding Items Following The Spanish Bailout

Keep your eye on Italy.
Last edited by Gumby on Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
Gosso
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 am
Location: Canada

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gosso »

Gumby wrote:
Gosso wrote:Disengage LTT?  Engage gold and stocks?
Not so fast... For an interesting bear argument, see ZeroHedge:

ZH: Spain IS Greece After All: Here Are The Main Outstanding Items Following The Spanish Bailout

Keep your eye on Italy.
I am extremely interested to see how the markets react to this news this week  The mess in Europe is obviously bigger than this, so it might have no impact, but it could be a sign that they are loosening the purse strings.  Regardless of anyone's opinion on whether it is ethical to bail out (provide large loans) to banks that have made bad loans, I have to think this will juice the markets and increase confidence.  And lets face it, our entire economic/political system is based on confidence, and the willingness of people to participate and thrive in the system.
User avatar
Storm
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Storm »

Europe and the ECB has done entirely too much austerity.  The thought that forcing a country accepting a bailout to cut spending in the face of 25% unemployment is going to improve their creditworthiness is frankly laughable.  It would be like your bank telling you that the only way they will refinance your mortgage, which you can't afford to pay, is if you take a lower paying job.

And yet, we have half of congress and a presidential candidate in the US saying the same thing...
"I came here for financial advice, but I've ended up with a bunch of shave soaps and apparently am about to start eating sardines.  Not that I'm complaining, of course." -ZedThou
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by MediumTex »

Storm wrote: Europe and the ECB has done entirely too much austerity.  The thought that forcing a country accepting a bailout to cut spending in the face of 25% unemployment is going to improve their creditworthiness is frankly laughable.  It would be like your bank telling you that the only way they will refinance your mortgage, which you can't afford to pay, is if you take a lower paying job.

And yet, we have half of congress and a presidential candidate in the US saying the same thing...
Austerity does seem like a sort of silly concept for getting an economy out of a ditch.  As I recall we had a long thread on this topic a while back.

It would be like an oncologist recommending that a cancer patient lose a few pounds because losing a few pounds is generally good for your health.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by craigr »

I'm trying to remember where I read it, but Spain blows up their currency on average around every 40 years or so. They've had the most defaults of any western country if I recall as well. The entire idea of the euro putting all these countries under one currency was doomed from the beginning. I just wish they'd kick out Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland and get on with life. Or, better yet, dissolve the whole thing and just admit that there is too much history and cultural differences between those countries for the idea of a unified government and currency to have any chance of working.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Pointedstick »

craigr wrote: I'm trying to remember where I read it, but Spain blows up their currency on average around every 40 years or so. They've had the most defaults of any western country if I recall as well. The entire idea of the euro putting all these countries under one currency was doomed from the beginning. I just wish they'd kick out Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland and get on with life. Or, better yet, dissolve the whole thing and just admit that there is too much history and cultural differences between those countries for the idea of a unified government and currency to have any chance of working.


+1,000

I generally think the folks who are hoping or pushing for a more centralized European government to kick the member nations into line are severely discounting the cultural and linguistic differences between the member nations, and the associated enmity they cause. There's a lot of bad history and old grudges.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Gosso
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 am
Location: Canada

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gosso »

craigr wrote: [...] just admit that there is too much history and cultural differences between those countries for the idea of a unified government and currency to have any chance of working.
This is similar to what the Quebec Separatists want.  I'm not fully aware of all the issues but I think it mainly revolves around their fear that Canada is trying to take away their culture and language.  Quebec almost became an independent country in 1995, and only lost the vote by 50.5% to 49.5%.

I would imagine that if Europe became US 2.0, that the separatists talks would be Quebec times ten.

I'm kinda surprised we don't see this type of "separatist talk" within the states of the US.  Or do you?
murphy_p_t
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1675
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by murphy_p_t »

Gosso wrote: I'm kinda surprised we don't see this type of "separatist talk" within the states of the US.  Or do you?
http://freestateproject.org/

i think these folks would like to take over NH & then likely leave the US
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Xan »

Gosso wrote:I'm kinda surprised we don't see this type of "separatist talk" within the states of the US.  Or do you?
It was tried once before, and the result was a war, after which the victors embarked on a multi-generational project to convince the defeated party and their descendents that anything associated with that side is racist, treasonous, and literally evil.  So it's still a little hard to have an honest discussion about it.
User avatar
Gosso
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:22 am
Location: Canada

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gosso »

Xan wrote:
Gosso wrote:I'm kinda surprised we don't see this type of "separatist talk" within the states of the US.  Or do you?
It was tried once before, and the result was a war, after which the victors embarked on a multi-generational project to convince the defeated party and their descendents that anything associated with that side is racist, treasonous, and literally evil.  So it's still a little hard to have an honest discussion about it.
Good point.  I can see how this topic might stir up some strong emotions.  It's difficult to have a fruitful discussion when that happens.
User avatar
Storm
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Storm »

Xan wrote:
Gosso wrote:I'm kinda surprised we don't see this type of "separatist talk" within the states of the US.  Or do you?
It was tried once before, and the result was a war, after which the victors embarked on a multi-generational project to convince the defeated party and their descendents that anything associated with that side is racist, treasonous, and literally evil.  So it's still a little hard to have an honest discussion about it.
It's hard to argue that allowing slavery of one race by another is not racist, treasonous, or evil.  However, this is probably my liberal upbringing in a western state that is ignorant of the real reasons for the civil war.  I've heard from people in the south (lived there for a couple years) that the civil war was about state rights, and not slavery, but I believe the constitution guarantees certain inalienable rights to all persons, and trumps any states right to infringe on them.
"I came here for financial advice, but I've ended up with a bunch of shave soaps and apparently am about to start eating sardines.  Not that I'm complaining, of course." -ZedThou
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Xan »

Storm wrote:I believe the constitution guarantees certain inalienable rights to all persons, and trumps any states right to infringe on them.
That's only true after the 14th Amendment (and after the war), which is what changed the nature of the United States.  The 14th Amendment created (out of whole cloth) the idea of a US citizen, independent of citizenship in any state.  Before that, the only way to be a citizen of the United States was to be a citizen of one of the states in the union.

That's one of the main things that changed the union from a voluntary association of free states to vassal states ruled from Washington.  And we're still dealing with that fallout.

I should also point out that the passage of the 14th Amendment was extremely weaselly, especially considering the fundamental change that it represented.  After the war, the radical northeasterners had a majority in Congress, since the South was not yet back in Congress.  The radicals wanted to push for the 14th Amendment, since it basically gave them unlimited power.  3/4 of the states must approve an amendment, of course, and (I believe) states like New Jersey and much of the midwest were adamantly opposed to the 14th Amendment.

So the radicals decided that the seceded southern states, despite being not represented in Congress and under military occupation, would vote on the amendment and have their votes count.  Not only that, they used their majority in Congress to force the southern states under their control to vote for the amendment.  They had their cake and ate it too: the southern states either counted or didn't, whatever served their aims.
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by Gumby »

Pointedstick wrote:
craigr wrote: I'm trying to remember where I read it, but Spain blows up their currency on average around every 40 years or so. They've had the most defaults of any western country if I recall as well. The entire idea of the euro putting all these countries under one currency was doomed from the beginning. I just wish they'd kick out Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland and get on with life. Or, better yet, dissolve the whole thing and just admit that there is too much history and cultural differences between those countries for the idea of a unified government and currency to have any chance of working.

+1,000

I generally think the folks who are hoping or pushing for a more centralized European government to kick the member nations into line are severely discounting the cultural and linguistic differences between the member nations, and the associated enmity they cause. There's a lot of bad history and old grudges.
Well, first of all, I have no idea why independent countries would willingly agree to give away their sovereign right to create their own currencies unless they truly wanted a unified European government. It's madness.

Second...Europe's problem is NOT limited to a few delinquent countries with bad track records. Europe has a tremendous currency flaw. In the United States, or Japan, when a government spends money, domestic bank reserves inflate (as well as domestic accounts held by the foreign sector) and the excess reserves need to be drained into risk free assets (particularly since banks don't like holding excess reserves). So, the government holds regular bond auctions and, what do you know, banks show up to funnel their excess reserves into the only risk-free assets available for that particular currency (Treasuries or JGBs, etc.). And if not enough banks or people show up to the auction, Primary Dealers are legally obligated to funnel their excess reserves into government bonds. It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

But, when the Spanish or Italian or Greek government spends money, that money might not be used to buy domestic debt. Rather, it tends to leak to bank accounts in Germany, to buy German debt. Or it leaks to France, to buy French debt.

So, the Spanish government spending doesn't necessarily help finance Spanish government debts. And Greek government spending doesn't necessarily help fund Greek debts. And Italian government spending doesn't necessarily help fund Greek debt. Their spending often ends up funding the debt of the stronger Eurozone countries.

In fact, this is nothing short of a recipe for disaster. Because even if you kicked Greece, Spain, and Italy out of the Euro, whichever countries that had the lowest rated debt would simply find their government spending leaking to bank accounts in more stable countries where it would be used to purchase far more stable debt.

Richard Koo's simple proposal to save the Eurozone is to ban countries from selling sovereign debt to anyone that's not domestic, so that all spending and borrowing would stay domestic. I'm not sure how you would properly enforce that, but it's an interesting proposal.

In any case, Europe's problem isn't really about government spending (though, they could certainly stand to be wiser about it). Europe's problem is that countries don't have their own currencies, and their spending is often used to finance the more stable governments in the Euro.

It's almost as if this flaw was created intentionally — to undermine the unstable peripheral nations and keep Germany and France thriving.
Last edited by Gumby on Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by MediumTex »

Xan wrote:
Storm wrote:I believe the constitution guarantees certain inalienable rights to all persons, and trumps any states right to infringe on them.
That's only true after the 14th Amendment (and after the war), which is what changed the nature of the United States.  The 14th Amendment created (out of whole cloth) the idea of a US citizen, independent of citizenship in any state.  Before that, the only way to be a citizen of the United States was to be a citizen of one of the states in the union.

That's one of the main things that changed the union from a voluntary association of free states to vassal states ruled from Washington.  And we're still dealing with that fallout.

I should also point out that the passage of the 14th Amendment was extremely weaselly, especially considering the fundamental change that it represented.  After the war, the radical northeasterners had a majority in Congress, since the South was not yet back in Congress.  The radicals wanted to push for the 14th Amendment, since it basically gave them unlimited power.  3/4 of the states must approve an amendment, of course, and (I believe) states like New Jersey and much of the midwest were adamantly opposed to the 14th Amendment.

So the radicals decided that the seceded southern states, despite being not represented in Congress and under military occupation, would vote on the amendment and have their votes count.  Not only that, they used their majority in Congress to force the southern states under their control to vote for the amendment.  They had their cake and ate it too: the southern states either counted or didn't, whatever served their aims.
The Confederacy's arguments for state sovereignty were sound.  The problem was simply that they didn't have enough guns to back up their legal arguments on the battlefield.

I think that most people today would say that human slavery was a sad chapter in the history of the U.S. (I certainly would), and the fact that the writer of the Declaration of Independence was himself a slaveholder makes it clear that the Founding Fathers didn't really believe that all men were created equal, but they did provide a nice theoretical framework for a reasonably enlightened government.

BTW, it is almost certain that Thomas Jefferson did not write the Declaration of Independence.  It seems far more likely that Thomas Paine wrote it, but the nature of the document dicated that it come from the hand of a colonist, and the hand of a respected Virginian was ideal, and thus Thomas Jefferson got to put his name on it, even though there is overwhelming evidence that Thomas Paine actually wrote it.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by moda0306 »

While I don't agree with Lincoln's war, I hesitate to call the Southern state governments legitimate.  About 1/3 of the white's owned slaves.  Blacks made up about 39% of the population of the South, yet were property.  Women couldn't vote to boot, and only just recently in the century had anyone but "landowners" been able to do the same.  I know there was more to the war than slavery, but I wonder what forces it would take to EVER bring the Southern states to allow 40% of the Southern population going from slave status to voting citizen.

MT... you recently mentioned that there were three ways to obtain wealth... to produce it, confiscate it, or inherite it.  That was 100% right.  The South had confiscation written all over it.  Did the land barons actually produce value, or simply control the political mechanisms that deeded "their land" and the slaves they forced to harvest it?

Now it was certainly "more legitimate" than most governments of the world at the time, but I think their rebellion (as well as Lincoln's assault) had a lot more to do with the plutocracy in charge of the draft (indirectly) than any Jeffersonian (or Imancipationist) philosophers riling two nations to war.
Last edited by moda0306 on Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by MediumTex »

moda0306 wrote: MT... you recently mentioned that there were three ways to obtain wealth... to produce it, confiscate it, or inherite it.  That was 100% right.  The South had confiscation written all over it.  Did the land barons actually produce value, or simply control the political mechanisms that deeded "their land" and the slaves they forced to harvest it?
I think that it was a blend of production, inheritance and theft.

The production was in the form of agricultural output that wouldn't have occurred without a lot of work and knowledge of farming techniques.

The inheritance was in the form of Colonel Sanders passing along the plantation to Scarlett and Rhett when he became confined to a rocking chair on the porch.

The theft was the confiscation of the labor output of slaves, which was little more than a magnolia-scented bit of thuggery.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Spanish Banks to potentially receive $100 Billion Euros

Post by moda0306 »

MT,

Yes, there was some definite skill there... I didn't mean to completely discount it.  I think there was plenty of the other two though... and that's where I lose most of my romantic thoughts of Jeffersonian Federalism.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
Post Reply