tomfoolery wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:56 pm I'm interested in scientific discussion only if it confirms my ideology. It sounds like that would be a good article for Republicans and Libertarians, but Democrats should avoid reading it.

Moderator: Global Moderator
tomfoolery wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:56 pm I'm interested in scientific discussion only if it confirms my ideology. It sounds like that would be a good article for Republicans and Libertarians, but Democrats should avoid reading it.
dualstow, Just dropping in to say that what you have written above has just a touch of BS. One has nothing to do with the other. The shingles shot can be set up easily at your local pharmacy, I believe. My wife and I both had ours a couple of years ago. It's two shots about a month apart IIRC.
Vinny, I strongly encourage you to get the shingles shot. I've known a couple of people who had it; believe me you do not want to have the experience of a nasty case. If you had chicken pox, and possibly cold sores, earlier in your life you are more succeptible. Secondly, my personal belief is whether or not to get a vaccine (including for Covid-19) should be considered from a medical point of view, NOT a political or economic (within reason) point of view. If you can afford all that cat food and driving all over the place to obtain it, you certainly can afford to pay for a shingles shot.dualstow wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 6:16 amyankees60 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:37 pm But I know the way that I am...if there is a financial issue involved with medical care I'm going to be my usual frugal self and forego something I probably should not. So I chose the most expensive plan choice so as to never have $$$$ cost be part of the decision for me
ok, but I don’t think that should be defined as frugal. Frugal is wisely lowering costs or going no frills and thus creating savings. Forgoing the (probable) prevention of shingles is different.
You’re right. But the shots made me so sick that I don’t want the shingles one too close to the covid booster. I have some trips coming up so I’ll have to do each when I can just come home and be sick. I don’t feel the shingles one is too urgent. I just recently hit the right age.barrett wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 6:52 amdualstow, Just dropping in to say that what you have written above has just a touch of BS. One has nothing to do with the other. The shingles shot can be set up easily at your local pharmacy, I believe. My wife and I both had ours a couple of years ago. It's two shots about a month apart IIRC.
The "covid stuff" is not likely to have any definite end as I am sure you probably know. Just get the dang Shingrix inoculation so that one of our best posters is not too sick to type. Pretty please?
dualstow wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 6:16 am
yankees60 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:37 pm
But I know the way that I am...if there is a financial issue involved with medical care I'm going to be my usual frugal self and forego something I probably should not. So I chose the most expensive plan choice so as to never have $$$$ cost be part of the decision for me
ok, but I don’t think that should be defined as frugal. Frugal is wisely lowering costs or going no frills and thus creating savings. Forgoing the (probable) prevention of shingles is different.
Shingles? Layman here, but I don’t think so. I think it’s like this: if you’ve had chicken pox, the virus never left your body. Decades later, it manifests as shingles. Same virus.Vinny wrote:Does anyone here now how it is contracted? I assume it is communicable from another person? Can you get it by touching a door knob?
Another laydoctor here. dualstow is correct. Same virus, just hanging around dormant until it's not.dualstow wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 7:48 amShingles? Layman here, but I don’t think so. I think it’s like this: if you’ve had chicken pox, the virus never left your body. Decades later, it manifests as shingles. Same virus.Vinny wrote:Does anyone here now how it is contracted? I assume it is communicable from another person? Can you get it by touching a door knob?
You claimed that vaccines were causing the variants. As far as I know, all the variants so far have developed without the vaccine's involvement. If you're going to make that claim shouldn't you be able to point to at least one variant? I don't think you can just say "not sure" after you've claimed that's what happened.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:18 pmApparently he has training in veterinary virology. I’m not sure that he would treat anyone’s sick pet.Xan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:02 pmIs this the guy who's a veterinarian? Also, didn't Delta start in India not long after the vaccine was invented in the US, when India had a 0% vaccination rate?flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:51 pm Not sure if anyone is still interested in reading scientific discussion. This is an excellent (but long) post by Geert Vanden Bossche, a vaccinologist who accurately predicted that mass vaccination with leaky (imperfect) vaccines during a pandemic would only drive the production of more infectious and dangerous variants.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
Not sure about Delta but it’s not the only variant.
He has expertise and an opinion and is sharing it. People can accept or dismiss it as they see fit.
I didn't claim anything. I'm still open to learning more about this entire situation so I am well within my rights to say "I'm not sure" about something. Perhaps I should have said Dr Vanden Bossche "may have predicted..." but even he acknowledges that he does not have a crystal ball. He's just following the science as he sees it. I thought that at the very least his argument was well thought out and more valuable to the general discussion than a lot of the clickbait that gets posted.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 8:49 amYou claimed that vaccines were causing the variants. As far as I know, all the variants so far have developed without the vaccine's involvement. If you're going to make that claim shouldn't you be able to point to at least one variant? I don't think you can just say "not sure" after you've claimed that's what happened.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:18 pmApparently he has training in veterinary virology. I’m not sure that he would treat anyone’s sick pet.Xan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:02 pmIs this the guy who's a veterinarian? Also, didn't Delta start in India not long after the vaccine was invented in the US, when India had a 0% vaccination rate?flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:51 pm Not sure if anyone is still interested in reading scientific discussion. This is an excellent (but long) post by Geert Vanden Bossche, a vaccinologist who accurately predicted that mass vaccination with leaky (imperfect) vaccines during a pandemic would only drive the production of more infectious and dangerous variants.
https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/post/the-last-post
Not sure about Delta but it’s not the only variant.
He has expertise and an opinion and is sharing it. People can accept or dismiss it as they see fit.
It seems that unmitigated spread is causing variants.
What I should add to the previous answer is: think about the original vaccines. People had little to no access to medical journals and no easy way to find things out. Then they’re told, “Look, we’re going to take some dead pathogens and punch a hole into your body so we can fill it with some of these dead pathogens. It’ll be swell!”flyingpylon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:18 pmIs it your understanding that the nature and consequences of polio and the efficacy of the polio vaccine are similar enough to those of COVID to make a comparison? Do you feel the government is similar enough between then and now to make a comparison in the level of trust?dualstow wrote: ↑Thu Sep 09, 2021 6:24 pm This reminds me: an older friend was telling me about how the nation was united against polio. Nobody effed around. Nobody thought it was a government plot, the Mark of the Beast, or anything nefarious. People just didn’t want to be crippled. I know this is no great revelation, but it does make you think.
Yes you did, you said "who accurately predicted that mass vaccination with leaky (imperfect) vaccines during a pandemic would only drive the production of more infectious and dangerous variants." (emphasis mine)flyingpylon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:13 amI didn't claim anything. I'm still open to learning more about this entire situation so I am well within my rights to say "I'm not sure" about something.
He did predict it, you just can't say it was accurate.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:13 amPerhaps I should have said Dr Vanden Bossche "may have predicted..." but even he acknowledges that he does not have a crystal ball. He's just following the science as he sees it. I thought that at the very least his argument was well thought out and more valuable to the general discussion than a lot of the clickbait that gets posted.
I am guilty of being more precise with my words than I intended. Feel free to deduct points from my social credit score for my indiscretion.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:49 amYes you did, you said "who accurately predicted that mass vaccination with leaky (imperfect) vaccines during a pandemic would only drive the production of more infectious and dangerous variants." (emphasis mine)flyingpylon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:13 amI didn't claim anything. I'm still open to learning more about this entire situation so I am well within my rights to say "I'm not sure" about something.
You're welcome to not be sure of something, but your original claim was that you were sure.
He did predict it, you just can't say it was accurate.flyingpylon wrote: ↑Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:13 amPerhaps I should have said Dr Vanden Bossche "may have predicted..." but even he acknowledges that he does not have a crystal ball. He's just following the science as he sees it. I thought that at the very least his argument was well thought out and more valuable to the general discussion than a lot of the clickbait that gets posted.
That’s the thing: I wrote 82.
Interesting. yeah, healthy teenagers- we need more studies.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:18 pm Boys more at risk from Pfizer vax than from Covid: Study:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ests-study
I don’t think I would be rushing to get my own kids vaccinated.
You know what would be interesting. Some serious adult discussion about the mechanisms that make the risk profile for healthy teenagers sway one way but sway differently for healthy adults. Just saying. Tell me a little bit about how all of this works.dualstow wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:44 pmInteresting. yeah, healthy teenagers- we need more studies.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:18 pm Boys more at risk from Pfizer vax than from Covid: Study:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ests-study
I don’t think I would be rushing to get my own kids vaccinated.
Last year, it seems the focus was on the elderly and their susceptibility (which is of course, a very real thing). Spring breaking kids felt immortal- with regard to covid, of course, not the vax. . Now, more details are emerging. Confusing times.