It's interesting to me that, according to Morningstar, and after today's carnage, the YTD return for LTPZ (PIMCO 15+Yr. TIPS) is: 18.58%, outpacing both IAU (15.90%) and TLT (14.49%).
I know that TIPS are generally anathema here on the PP discussion boards ("don't buy fire insurance from an arsonist" etc, etc....), and LTPZ hasn't been around that long, but could it be that, at least in this environment, the long duration variety is the best of both worlds relative to gold and long duration nominals
Best,
Maestro G
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, today is a gift, that's why it's called the present. Most daily market noise is "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Maestro G wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:18 am
It's interesting to me that, according to Morningstar, and after today's carnage, the YTD return for LTPZ (PIMCO 15+Yr. TIPS) is: 18.58%, outpacing both IAU (15.90%) and TLT (14.49%).
I know that TIPS are generally anathema here on the PP discussion boards ("don't buy fire insurance from an arsonist" etc, etc....), and LTPZ hasn't been around that long, but could it be that, at least in this environment, the long duration variety is the best of both worlds relative to gold and long duration nominals
Best,
Maestro G
This never received a response. What would be now the 10 year or so comparison between LTPZ, IAU, and TLT?
Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
I'm seriously considering swapping out half my TLT position with LTPZ. With the Fed's recent announcement to allow inflation to 'run hot' in the coming years, it seems prudent to diversify my bond holdings with a bit of inflation protection.
ozzy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:41 pm
In the past 10 years, LT Treasuries (TLT) have performed very similarly to LT TIPS (LTPZ). See link below, only a ~1% difference in CAGR.
I'm seriously considering swapping out half my TLT position with LTPZ. With the Fed's recent announcement to allow inflation to 'run hot' in the coming years, it seems prudent to diversify my bond holdings with a bit of inflation protection.
I wonder what HB would recommend to handle the big drops and swings in stocks like 2008 being down about 55%. The drawdown for LTPZ is somewhat the same as TLT. Also what do you lose by using LTPZ vs TLT. Maybe a little duration? Maybe pick up a little in Yield? What else?
Good question. The link shows "US Mkt Correlation" for TLT provides slightly more stock market crash protection. Other than that, I don't believe you're losing much. I'm not ready to go whole-hog into LTPZ, but I'm willing to go half-hog. I bought some LTPZ yesterday and its up +1.12% today. So far so good!
ozzy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:41 pm
In the past 10 years, LT Treasuries (TLT) have performed very similarly to LT TIPS (LTPZ). See link below, only a ~1% difference in CAGR.
I'm seriously considering swapping out half my TLT position with LTPZ. With the Fed's recent announcement to allow inflation to 'run hot' in the coming years, it seems prudent to diversify my bond holdings with a bit of inflation protection.
I wonder what HB would recommend to handle the big drops and swings in stocks like 2008 being down about 55%. The drawdown for LTPZ is somewhat the same as TLT. Also what do you lose by using LTPZ vs TLT. Maybe a little duration? Maybe pick up a little in Yield? What else?
hard to say .. perhaps today TLT would have sold off to meet margin calls and fed spending increasing the perception of inflation fears since rates are so low today and other means to pull out of deflation are needed .
history never repeats the same way twice ..only historians repeat themselves .
each time is just different enough that whatever you thought would work doesn't
ozzy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 7:42 pm
Good question. The link shows "US Mkt Correlation" for TLT provides slightly more stock market crash protection. Other than that, I don't believe you're losing much. I'm not ready to go whole-hog into LTPZ, but I'm willing to go half-hog. I bought some LTPZ yesterday and its up +1.12% today. So far so good!
perhaps splitting tlt with lptz is a slight improvement as well as split shy with vtip .
but in any case if rates rise to high there may not be a lot of difference in damage
ozzy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 7:42 pm
Good question. The link shows "US Mkt Correlation" for TLT provides slightly more stock market crash protection. Other than that, I don't believe you're losing much. I'm not ready to go whole-hog into LTPZ, but I'm willing to go half-hog. I bought some LTPZ yesterday and its up +1.12% today. So far so good!
perhaps splitting tlt with lptz is a slight improvement as well as split shy with vtip .
but in any case if rates rise to high there may not be a lot of difference in damage
Thanks! That does answer my question. If rates go up the damage is still with us.
mathjak107 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 8:44 am
i have another limit order in for tlt today at 159.99 ... this is the 4th time this week on tlt .
two at gains one got stopped out at slight loss.
i went back to short term trading it . it seems to follow every gain with a dip .
Appears there is convergence - nice support at 200 SMA on daily, 160$ also looks a decent support .. some indicators are slightly bullish as well .. let's see..