Budd, the voice of calm. These are definitely the End Times.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 8:50 am Stocks, Gold and LTT’s will finish in the Green today so go and get some sleep![]()

Moderator: Global Moderator
Budd, the voice of calm. These are definitely the End Times.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 8:50 am Stocks, Gold and LTT’s will finish in the Green today so go and get some sleep![]()
You have to remember that the markets job is to make it difficult for traders and investors alike. If the market does the most obvious thing, everyone would have a free winning lottery ticket. It needs to do the opposite of the obvious thing to keep both the bulls and bears honest. So there's one of three scenarios here:pp4me wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:58 pm So I read that April is going to turn out to be the best month for stocks since 1974. Sounds good until you remember that March was the worse since some year in the great depression.
What I can't figure is where all the optimism coming from. Do stock investors see something that I don't? Seems to me the economy is suffering from one of the most traumatic events in my lifetime and thoughts of a quick recovery are just wishful thinking.
I mean I just got back from the grocery store and not only were the shelves of paper products empty but now the meat supply is dwindling, especially chicken. My Dad went through the great depression, living on a farm, and I remember him telling me they ate better than they ever had before because there was nowhere to sell the produce. With chickens and cows being euthanized for the same reasons it doesn't give me much reason for optimism right now.
Either that, or they believe that the Fed will buy stocks.
you sold all equities ? we are effectively buying in every day in any asset we hold and continue to keep in play . we are up or down each day the same dollars regardless of new money or old money .
i agree ... but that is not what my posts are referring to ....... i am just saying if we leave our money invested we are no different then someone first buying in as far as loss or gain potential going forward
That pretty much sums up what I'm seeing and although it's always a good idea to hope for the best it's prudent to prepare for the worse which is exactly what those of us who follow the PP strategy have been doing with our money. Remarkably, my own portfolio just went slightly into positive territory YTD with the stock market gains. If anyone asked me today how they could duplicate the success I would have to honestly tell them you probably can't and you should refer to the story of the ant and the grasshopper.
This exactly. I know I've said it here a few times already, but it bears repeating... the markets cannot do the most obvious thing... or else it becomes an easy money printing machine for all. By design, it needs to confuse and confound in the short term to keep the bears and the bulls honest. Logic has NOTHING to do with markets on any timeframe less than a year. Less than a year it's all sentiment and emotion, fear and greed, etc that drive the prices. There is nothing logical about that. Know your timeframe. If you are a buy and hold investor, then buy and hold, follow the rules of your portfolio, and leave the sentiment speculation to the short term traders. If you're a short term trader, trade the current sentiment and ignore the logic or what you *believe* *should* happen. If you're a trend follower, follow the trend that is in front of you. Trade the chart you have, not the one you want. Know your timeframe. If you are a PP investor, then stop worrying, rebalance when the opportunities come, and let the market do whatever it's going to do. I have 0 worries about the 40% of my portfolio that is in a PP.mathjak107 wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2020 9:25 am my guess is that since we all see doom and gloom and maybe even a depression like scenario , markets never play out the way we think ...there is always stuff not even on the radar that alters what we all think is a given, that is both up or down .
Definitely not! It's true that the PP attracts a certain subset of people with doubts about the stock market, but the portfolio itself isn't inherently optimistic or pessimistic. The whole point is that it maintains a neutral outlook.
I know that, but as long as these posts are in the pp §, I tend to add that response in case there are new eyes who don't know that.mathjak107 wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2020 8:07 ami agree ... but that is not what my posts are referring to ....... i am just saying if we leave our money invested we are no different then someone first buying in as far as loss or gain potential going forward
However it allocates the assets equally into scenarios that tend to not have equal chances of playing out ...so yeah I would say the butterfly is likely better matched as to the likelihood of how assets tend to play out long term ,while the pp has more weight in pessimism for stocks.... prosperity tends to beat the other scenarios as far as amount of time it plays out since markets are up 2/3 the time and only down 1/3
Fair enough and maybe "Pessimism" isn't the right word. It's just that if you live long enough you eventually realize that the shit really can and does hit the fan and you need to be prepared.
Correct. But who claimed that the PP's equal weighting was based on an assumption of equal odds? Nobody did, and it's not.mathjak107 wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2020 3:51 pm Equal dollars does not mean equal chance of playing out ....there is a big difference in that fact ...if I remember that was one of Bernstein’s gripes about the pp...in practice equal dollars does not correspond to equal odds