TLH

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

TLH

Post by buddtholomew »

Tax loss harvested VTI for SPY this afternoon. Had a combination of short-term and long-term gains in PRPFX to offset before year's end.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: TLH

Post by moda0306 »

Nice work.

What are you going to do now?  Wait the month or invest in something slightly different?
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: TLH

Post by buddtholomew »

moda0306 wrote: Nice work.

What are you going to do now?  Wait the month or invest in something slightly different?

Thanks. I sold VTI and bought SPY this afternoon. The plan is to repurchase VTI on 11/4. For some reason, TLH was more difficult than I expected. Something inherently challenging with selling equities at a loss.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: TLH

Post by moda0306 »

bud,

I agree with that move.  I see it as extremely unlikely that the IRS goes on an audit spree trying to parce through the wash-sale rule.

There's just not much money in it. If the ordinary deduction limity was higher than $3,000, maybe there'd be some ROI, but if all they can get is $1,050 max out of someone, AND they have to argue that SPY & VTI are the same, which there is little precedent for, they are probably going to simply leave the issue alone.

If I DID get audited, I'd probably use the argument that "SPY was looking too tax-inefficient for you, and VTI was an inexpensive way to increase exposure to small & mid-cap stocks, which are a bargain right now with low dividend rates."

Between all the reasons above, I see no reason to worry.  The IRS is unlikely to make you their Wash-sale guinnea pig for a grand worth of tax revenue.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
steve
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:06 pm

Re: TLH

Post by steve »

If the market keeps going south I may do the same. I am also considering a switch to VOO. SPY has more volume then VOO (vanguards s&p500) but VOO has lower expense and no commision,
SPY  Annual Report Expense Ratio (net) 0.09%
VOO  Annual Report Expense Ratio (net) 0.06%
The last time I did a tax loss harvest (TLT) Long term treasuries turned on a dime, what I switched too just went up and up (EDV/VGLT) and I never got a chance to rebuy TLT. Not that this means anything but today EDV is up more then 71% from when I bought it and VGLT is up more then 32%. Just saying sometimes it is not that easy to switch back.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: TLH

Post by buddtholomew »

moda0306 wrote: bud,

I agree with that move.  I see it as extremely unlikely that the IRS goes on an audit spree trying to parce through the wash-sale rule.

There's just not much money in it. If the ordinary deduction limity was higher than $3,000, maybe there'd be some ROI, but if all they can get is $1,050 max out of someone, AND they have to argue that SPY & VTI are the same, which there is little precedent for, they are probably going to simply leave the issue alone.

If I DID get audited, I'd probably use the argument that "SPY was looking too tax-inefficient for you, and VTI was an inexpensive way to increase exposure to small & mid-cap stocks, which are a bargain right now with low dividend rates."

Between all the reasons above, I see no reason to worry.  The IRS is unlikely to make you their Wash-sale guinnea pig for a grand worth of tax revenue.
Interesting. I didn't think that a switch from VTI to SPY would violate the wash sale rule. VTI holds LC, MC and SC, whereas SPY is dominated by LC holdings.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: TLH

Post by moda0306 »

It's still up for debate, due to the common holdings between the two... it's a very untested area of the tax code.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: TLH

Post by MediumTex »

moda0306 wrote: It's still up for debate, due to the common holdings between the two... it's a very untested area of the tax code.
"Form over substance" is what the IRS would probably say.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: TLH

Post by buddtholomew »

I harvested losses in VTI and then hesitated for a brief moment before re-investing the proceeds in SPY. Had I waited the 30 days to avoid the wash sale rule, I would have given up 5.32% in gains from this Tuesday through close of market today (3-days). Just sharing an experience where I was able to offset gains with losses and then realize a gain in the replacement investment. Everything could have turned out differently, but taking the loss was the right thing to do even if the market continued to fall.

Best-
Budd
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Post Reply