I'm just about the complete opposite to this...
https://www.vyvanse.com/adhd-adult-symp ... &gclsrc=ds
Vinny
Moderator: Global Moderator
I'm just about the complete opposite to this...
I'm sure if the "progressives" attain more power they will pass laws making it illegal to refuse to do anything on the basis of moral objections... but only if the moral objector is a conservative. Refusing to bake a cake for a traditional wedding, for example, will not be punished.yankees60 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:02 pmI have a question in regards to your second sentence.Xan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 30, 2018 8:57 pm Gary has some "interesting" libertarian positions. Like that the baker should be forced to bake the homosexual cake. Audible gasps from the audience during the LP debate when he dropped that bombshell. Don't know how he still got the nomination. Says something about how crazy the other candidates were, I suppose. John McAfee was one.
I assume that the law says that this is what should happen so that there is not bias against someone due to the person's sexual orientation?
However, I as an accountant will not do work for someone or an organization whose product I find objectional and a detriment to society. There are no laws against refusing to do work for someone on that basis?
Vinny
That's because no one takes the impeachment seriously.yankees60 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:10 amHe DID get impeached.....And, so far the Market has NOT crashed!Cortopassi wrote: ↑Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:53 am I have gone from wanting him to drain the swamp, to voting for him, to cringing at tweets, to yelling at the TV, and finally just wanting him to go back home and let somebody else do this job. This is a non-stop reality show nightmare.
![]()
Vinny
Oh, he had character all right.yankees60 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:20 amI join you in NOT being a McCain fan. Again from watching so much C-Span I saw a lot of him, including the time he'd spend mingling with voters after campaign events and hearing what he said to them. I always thought him to be Mr. Ingenuine with no principles.stuper1 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:49 pmI'm curious to know what evidence you have for this statement? I can find plenty of places on the internet where people claim that McCain was a show-off pilot who never would have crashed in Vietnam if he hadn't been flying inappropriately. And that he then behaved dishonorably and disloyally in prison. That he left his first wife when he found another woman with a lot more money. That he had dishonest dealings related to the savings and loan scandal. That he was only too happy to send America to war whenever possible, thereby enriching the military-industrial complex, but causing many of our young people to come home with limbs missing or worse, not to mention far worse casualty levels among the native inhabitants. And the list goes on.
Now, I don't know whether all that stuff is true. But I also don't know whether the hagiography peddled by the mainstream media is true. I tend to think the latter is just pablum meant to keep the masses happy.
Vinny
I was just posting the same in a similar thread.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:14 pm Not sure if this deserves a separate thread, but what do people think of the recent pardons/commutations?
That article describes TDS type A and TDS type B, but I would argue there’s another option: ignore most of what a president says and judge them based on what actually does or does not get accomplished. If you generally approve, vote for them. If not, don’t. It really can be that simple.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 3:06 pm tech (and others),
Any response to the natural ability statement? Do you think he may actually start losing his core as/if this gets out of hand?
https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economic ... 20RgVB1XwQ
The thing I heard Scott Adams rant about was the press conference where Trump said he’d prefer everyone on the cruise ship off the coast of California to remain on the ship, because if they disembarked it would make the U.S. coronavirus stats look worse.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:58 pm I haven't kept up with Scott Adams in the past few days. What exactly is he unhappy about? I think Trump has been doing everything possible.
Yeah, I don't think it was Trump's action that bothered Adams; it was his publicly stated justification for that action. One of the things that Adams likes most about Trump is his skill in persuasion and for saying things that generally inspire confidence in his supporters (not in his detractors, obviously).Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:28 amOk, I agree that isn't a great thing to say. But did he forbid them to enter the country? Apparently not.Tortoise wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 7:28 pmThe thing I heard Scott Adams rant about was the press conference where Trump said he’d prefer everyone on the cruise ship off the coast of California to remain on the ship, because if they disembarked it would make the U.S. coronavirus stats look worse.Libertarian666 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:58 pm I haven't kept up with Scott Adams in the past few days. What exactly is he unhappy about? I think Trump has been doing everything possible.
So it didn't actually affect anyone other than via perception.
Stock market seems to like it.Cortopassi wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 2:56 pm I am listening to his press conf right now. I need alcohol. They all might as well be blowing him.