Do you prefer to keep all your savings in PP or you also diversify ?
I wonder if we should buy LAND, or apartments to rent or pavillions to rent to factories ...
Please advise.
Thank so much.
Moderator: Global Moderator


Hi,Hal wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 6:56 am You may wish to research Marc Fabers asset allocation.
https://mebfaber.com/2015/06/01/chapter ... portfolio/
It's been a while since I have listened to him, however a few years back he was purchasing land in SE Asia. He doesn't use REITS, so rebalancing may be an issue for small portfolios.
<edit>
comparison with PP and other portfolios here
https://mebfaber.com/2015/06/05/chapter ... trategies/
tenants might be an headacheKriegsspiel wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:24 am I bought, rehabbed, and sold a house a few years ago. I was recently on the hunt for a house that I could do a live-in flip with, but ended up buying my current house after the previous owner had done the work, but sold it to me under the market. So I could move out and rent it for fairly big monthly cashflow.
Anyways, yes I do plan on making real estate a small business for myself. I'm not yet set on renting or rehabbing, or a combination of the two. I think my first experience with tenants might sway me one way or anotherI live in an area where buying a commercial or agricultural property could be in the cards too.
Himathjak107 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:42 am we owned lots of investment real estate in manhattan ... we sold it all off over the years . we want no more investment real estate in retirement or dealing with tenants .
i want only liquid investments with no dealings with tenants now that can be swapped , sold or rebalanced with the click of a mouse .
real estate for us was actually a business even though we had a mgmt company running things for our LLC. i don't want a business in retirement .


frugal wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:38 amHimathjak107 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 7:42 am we owned lots of investment real estate in manhattan ... we sold it all off over the years . we want no more investment real estate in retirement or dealing with tenants .
i want only liquid investments with no dealings with tenants now that can be swapped , sold or rebalanced with the click of a mouse .
real estate for us was actually a business even though we had a mgmt company running things for our LLC. i don't want a business in retirement .
what do you want to pass to your family ? PP or real state?
Keep all in $ and give it to your childs might not be good...
![]()

Hi.boglerdude wrote: ↑Sun Dec 08, 2019 10:28 pm Id rather be all in PP but got pushed into real estate by the hype in 05
With Real estate you can put in time, sweat equity, and boost your return. Plus the leverage. If the true inflation rate is 5%, a 4% mortgage is free money.
But you're making a concentrated bet on the demographic future of the city. And you need to know your personality, if a tenant goes broke they can seize your property for a year and its a terrible feeling. Found out I'm too neurotic for that.


+1 If you’re into it, frugal, it can obviously be very lucrative. I’m not handy, so I own REITs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:42 am Why bother with more complexity. PP is good enough. Unless you want the part-time job of finding, managing, and improving houses.
Isn't a REIT good enough exposure? SCHH, VNQ?boglerdude wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:42 am Why bother with more complexity. PP is good enough. Unless you want the part-time job of finding, managing, and improving houses.
dualstow wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:27 am+1 If you’re into it, frugal, it can obviously be very lucrative. I’m not handy, so I own REITs.boglerdude wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:42 am Why bother with more complexity. PP is good enough. Unless you want the part-time job of finding, managing, and improving houses.
boglerdude wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:42 am Why bother with more complexity. PP is good enough. Unless you want the part-time job of finding, managing, and improving houses.

Reits are still stocks ..they are not the same as owning brick and mortar yourself ...ochotona wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:47 amIsn't a REIT good enough exposure? SCHH, VNQ?boglerdude wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:42 am Why bother with more complexity. PP is good enough. Unless you want the part-time job of finding, managing, and improving houses.


I love just taking some down time and having fun trading .. all these 200 buck hits pretty much cover all the spending we do all week when we are out and about and eat here , or bring home stuff from there ....so aside from being fun doing it a few times a week , it gives us money we can just use for all the extra stuff we really shouldn’t buy but enjoy buying and eating .
Hi.

yes day trading for decades has been very profitable for me .
Hellomathjak107 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:47 amyes day trading for decades has been very profitable for me .
as far as the pp goes , that cash is sacred in the pp as i said many times before .
it is not used as spending cash as it is a very important component that is designed in to the portfolio .. being retired our spending needs are quite a bit that we draw so it would just unbalance the pp .
by itself the pp does not generate enough as an average return to give us that " free cash " we do our fun spending with. the weight of cash and gold over most years takes it's toll from a gain standpoint .
the pp is used in conjunction with a more aggressive growth portfolio and the two together is the core of our retirement portfolio .
so the fun trading generates a relatively high return but it is speculative and short term and never something i count on as far as living off it just because it is strictly by the seat of my pants . i don't always get to do it as well .so in it's own right it is fun and generates the fun money but nothing i would count on to live on .
