Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
That's an interesting idea. I'm not sure Germany alone would be an appropriate source for EMU bonds as a whole, but maybe I could properly weight them.
-
- Associate Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:36 am
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
Brownehead did an interesting analysis on the performance of the European countries bonds in the event of a deflation (which we had during the recent years). The conclusion is that German bunds where the best performers and only Netherlands and Finland had a similar performance. That's because, as we know, when things look difficult money goes to the safest place. So I don't think a capitalization based index will work for the euro PP. These indexes are full of, for example, French bonds that suffer during crises.Tyler wrote:That's an interesting idea. I'm not sure Germany alone would be an appropriate source for EMU bonds as a whole, but maybe I could properly weight them.
http://www.carterapermanente.es/bonos-europeos/
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
For anyone interested, the site has finally been updated with World Small and World Value data. Check it out: https://portfoliocharts.com/2017/06/03/ ... big-world/Tyler wrote: World small caps are on my short list for things I'd like to add. The issue is that data is really hard to come by. As you already pointed out, even MSCI only has ACWI SC data back to 1994. I'm exploring different sources and models for backtesting options, but it will take time to get right.
- blue_ruin17
- Executive Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:16 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
I saved this in notepad when I came across it somewhere in Bogleheads, but did not copy the URL.
PP In Iceland, 2008:
1. 25% LT Bonds: 0%
2. 25% ST Bonds: 12%
3. 25% Stocks: -88%
4. 25% Gold: +259%
Total PP: +46%
PP In Iceland, 2008:
1. 25% LT Bonds: 0%
2. 25% ST Bonds: 12%
3. 25% Stocks: -88%
4. 25% Gold: +259%
Total PP: +46%
STAT PERPETUS PORTFOLIO DUM VOLVITUR ORBIS
Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
Amazon: Investing Equanimity: The Logic & Wisdom of the Permanent Portfolio
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
Permanent Portfolio Rescues Iceland From Total Collapse:blue_ruin17 wrote:I saved this in notepad when I came across it somewhere in Bogleheads, but did not copy the URL.
PP In Iceland, 2008:
1. 25% LT Bonds: 0%
2. 25% ST Bonds: 12%
3. 25% Stocks: -88%
4. 25% Gold: +259%
Total PP: +46%
http://www.thepermanentportfolio.com/pe ... -collapse/
Re: Backtesting the PP in Other Countries (Economies)
Apparently the PP didn't do great in Japan: https://portfoliocharts.com/portfolio/portfolio-matrix/ (select Japan from the dropdown thingy).aj76er wrote: ↑Sun Apr 23, 2017 1:10 pm Hi All,
For more empirical evidence of how the PP would respond to various economic conditions is there any (vetted) data on how it would have worked in other countries? Some example scenarios I'd like to see:
1. Long, deflationary conditions (Japan)
2. Transition from supplier of world's reserve currency (Britain)
3. Hyper-inflation (Argentina)
4. Economic collapse (Iceland)
These are (or were) all developed countries and so I feel like similar situations could occur in the U.S.. Thus, I'd like to see how the PP or GB holds up against real-world data as a validation of the theory.
And for FWIW, I'm considering transitioning to a GB-inspired portfolio:
1. 40% Stocks (in 2:1 split between U.S. and ex-U.S.)
2. 20% Gold
3. 20% LTT
4. 20% Cash (including I/EE-bonds)
Thanks!
Does that mean the PP is not at its best in deflationary conditions?