My monthly savings (income minus expenses) is about 1% of my PP portfolio. When investing that money, should I put the money into the lowest proportioned asset or should I distribute it evenly 4 ways?
Or I suppose I could do nothing, wait until cash hits 35% and rebalance then...
What do you all do?
Regular reinvesting
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: Regular reinvesting
You could keep these money in cash or in a short-term Treasury bond. I accumulate the money intended for PP in PRPFX (in a taxable account) and in PTRAX (in 401k) and invest them when the rebalancing is due. I just don't want them to sit in cash, although there could be a time when cash is the only thing that doesn't tank.
"Let every man divide his money into three parts, and invest a third in land, a third in business, and a third let him keep in reserve."
- Talmud
- Talmud
Re: Regular reinvesting
You can either purchase the lagging asset, attempting to get it as close to 25% as possible, or you can add it to cash and rebalance when it hits 35%.
Personally I have my paycheck 401k deduction automatically sent to my Brokerage-Link account and I just buy the lagging asset. When I have extra savings in my non-tax deferred account, I do the same thing. By doing this I have so far been able to avoid rebalancing, which saves me from taxable events in my non-tax deferred account.
It would be great to see some data modeling on the difference, but I suspect it would be almost the same.
Assume a PP investor starts 1980 and contributes $1,000 per month to his 401k ($12,000 per year). By 2010, how much difference would it make if he purchased the lagging asset each month or just sent it to cash and rebalanced at 35%?
I'm not sure where I would even begin to get monthly data going back that far, but it sure would be interesting to see the difference in long term performance.
Personally I have my paycheck 401k deduction automatically sent to my Brokerage-Link account and I just buy the lagging asset. When I have extra savings in my non-tax deferred account, I do the same thing. By doing this I have so far been able to avoid rebalancing, which saves me from taxable events in my non-tax deferred account.
It would be great to see some data modeling on the difference, but I suspect it would be almost the same.
Assume a PP investor starts 1980 and contributes $1,000 per month to his 401k ($12,000 per year). By 2010, how much difference would it make if he purchased the lagging asset each month or just sent it to cash and rebalanced at 35%?
I'm not sure where I would even begin to get monthly data going back that far, but it sure would be interesting to see the difference in long term performance.
"I came here for financial advice, but I've ended up with a bunch of shave soaps and apparently am about to start eating sardines. Not that I'm complaining, of course." -ZedThou
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15237
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Regular reinvesting
I would reinvest in all four but I don't. The reason is that I feel I have enough gold ETFs and would like to add more gold coins. If I buy a bunch at once, I can get a break on the dealer's fee. So, I'm going to accumulate a bit of cash.
If you're going to just buy gold ETFs, and you can afford at least one ~$1000 treasury bond (or TLT), you could buy all four.
If you're going to just buy gold ETFs, and you can afford at least one ~$1000 treasury bond (or TLT), you could buy all four.
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you