Men, women and sex

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Cortopassi »

Gabe wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Gabe wrote: She even surprised me with a ridiculously hot 19 year old for Valentine's Day :P.
Wow.  As I was reading your post, I wasn't expecting that.

I'll bet you weren't either.
Nope. I came home to a note on the door "If you could have two of anything in the world, what would they be? [...]" I followed the trail of rose petals to her and this girl in matching lingerie making out on the bed. They both giggled and she said "Gabe, meet Hannah, your Valentine's Day gift." Pretty sure I was the luckiest guy in a tri-state radius on Sunday night.
You know nothing is every really deleted off the internet...!

But I am sure you have all the males on this forum going OMG.  Was there cheesy 1970s music in the background?  ;D
Test of the signature line
Gabe
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:46 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Gabe »

Eh, I'm still giddy and this forum is obscure and tiny enough that I'm not overly concerned about my presidential ambitions being thwarted. I mean, really, I respect Bill Clinton *more* for cheating on that hag of a wife of his.

Alas no 70s music, it was a mix of EDM and melodic dubstep - as befit our companion, seeing as she apparently woke up a few hours prior to our evening rendezvous after having passed out from dancing for hours the night before on ecstasy.

I couldn't have been more pleased to become acquainted with her, but if I have daughters, that girl is seriously my nightmare incarnate.
Last edited by Gabe on Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Before I had kids, I had what you could say was a very high sex drive, but I think it's different than men's still.  It's more that I just enjoyed the intimacy of it.  It made me feel so close to my husband.  But after kids, I'm so tired all the time it's really something I could do without most of the time.

That makes me think it's not that I actually have a high drive (except when I'm in my fertile window) I just rather most of the time enjoy the closeness of it.  When I'm preoccupied with other things, the desire for sex takes the back burner.

Now that doesn't happen to my husband.  His drive is always steady and always high.  So in general I hardly ever reject him because I see it as a need of his.  And actually still these days I'd say I initiate half the time because I know he needs it.  It usually takes me a little while to get into it but that's okay.

Sometimes if we go a little longer he gets super irritable.  Every so often if we get into a little fight he'll actually say outloud how pissed he is that he wanted to enjoy a good weekend and now we're fighting and probably won't have sex.  I see it as necessary for me to provide that for him regularly to help him stay happy.  He doesn't have anyone else to get it from, and in the grand scheme of things I'm glad he needs it from me.  His need requires us to maintain the frequency that we have which also keeps us closer emotionally.

Some women misread the signs from their husbands.  They think they're rewarding their bad behavior by giving them sex even if they don't deserve it.  I think it's wrong to make sex something the man has to earn.  What a difficult way to live!  She's his only source for a legitimate need, and she agreed to that arrangement when she married him.

In terms of "rewarding bad behavior," you could say I do a similar thing with my five year old daughter.  In terms of discipline, I am pretty calm and controlled and have some strategies I use, but if she's really hungry she becomes a monster and no amount of discipline strategies do much good.  I can tell when she's getting that way and I make it my first priority to give her food before getting all bent out of shape over her behavior.

Some women really do punish their husbands with no sex on purpose, and I find that very cruel.  It's not a misreading of the signs.  Some actually sleep in a different room for a while to make a real statement about it.  There is no respect for the male body in that case.  They don't realize that they could actually have things a lot better if she gave it willingly and lovingly, as he would be so in love with her and inspired to do so much for her.

***

MT edit: Sorry, I hit the "Modify" button when I meant to hit the "Quote" button.  I just changed it back when I realized what happened.
Last edited by Michellebell on Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8883
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Pointedstick »

Although that Valentine's day gift is basically every man's dream come true, it's not the kind of thing that screams out "stable long-term relationship" to me. The ugly truth is that in a healthy and functional marriage, there's going to be a lot of dead time filled with boring stuff, drudgery, hard discussions of feelings and emotions, arguments, fights, hurt feelings, and the like. How the two partners deal with these stresses is one of the biggest things that I think determines the health of the marriage. Seekers of constant excitement, pleasure, and novelty will quickly tire of the boring regularity that inevitably creeps into every long-term relationship.

I'm glad you got to experience the dream, but don't let it change anything you were thinking before. You two are still in the courtship phase and that kind of thing is going to dry up once you're married. It has to; that kind of excitement can't be kept up for long in anybody without leading to burnout and exhaustion. A healthy marriage is much more of a marathon than a sprint.

Valentine's day threesomes are the granite countertops of a stable long-term relationship; the foundation is each partner's stability, emotional maturity, communication skills. If you've personally witnessed and experienced how both of you have those in spades, then go ahead and buy the granite countertops. ;)

Im my opinion, the best people to ask for marriage advice are those who have been married for multiple decades, and especially those who have been divorced once first. Their perspectives tend to be very wise. So Ignore all the crap I just said until I'm 70. ;D
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4553
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Xan »

Some comments seem to have disappeared...
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by MediumTex »

Xan wrote: Some comments seem to have disappeared...
Maybe they were in the other relationship thread.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4553
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Xan »

MediumTex wrote:
Xan wrote: Some comments seem to have disappeared...
Maybe they were in the other relationship thread.
What a doofus!  Of course they were.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by MediumTex »

Michellebell wrote: Before I had kids, I had what you could say was a very high sex drive, but I think it's different than men's still.  It's more that I just enjoyed the intimacy of it.  It made me feel so close to my husband.  But after kids, I'm so tired all the time it's really something I could do without most of the time.
There was an episode of "This American Life" where a transgender person who was going from woman to man was being interviewed, and she talked about what it was like to be on high doses of testosterone.

She talked about how if she found herself around people she found attractive almost any scene in real life would mutate into a porn scene in her mind.  She talked about how that level of raw desire popping up at almost any moment was a jarring experience.

Now, based on her observations, I wonder what she would have thought about a female partner who intentionally pulled those strings of desire for the purpose of manipulating her.  Not cool.
That makes me think it's not that I actually have a high drive (except when I'm in my fertile window) I just rather most of the time enjoy the closeness of it.  When I'm preoccupied with other things, the desire for sex takes the back burner.

Now that doesn't happen to my husband.  His drive is always steady and always high.  So in general I hardly ever reject him because I see it as a need of his.  And actually still these days I'd say I initiate half the time because I know he needs it.  It usually takes me a little while to get into it but that's okay.
It's like when men go to RomComs with their wives.  They might think it's going to be terrible, but often it turns out that the men enjoy the movie just as much as their wives.  It's just being generous and flexible with your partner's needs.  It's not rape, or patriarchy, or petulant or childish.  Your partner has a need, and you can either choose to fulfill the need or choose to ignore it.  It's pretty simple, and one of the easy ways of navigating situations like that is to simply ask yourself what you would want your partner to do for you if the roles were reversed.
Sometimes if we go a little longer he gets super irritable.  Every so often if we get into a little fight he'll actually say outloud how pissed he is that he wanted to enjoy a good weekend and now we're fighting and probably won't have sex.  I see it as necessary for me to provide that for him regularly to help him stay happy.  He doesn't have anyone else to get it from, and in the grand scheme of things I'm glad he needs it from me.  His need requires us to maintain the frequency that we have which also keeps us closer emotionally.
I suspect that a lot of people would judge your behavior along the lines of: "You are enabling and encouraging his childish behavior", but it seems to me that it would be nice to have a partner who desires you that much.  If you really care about the person who feels so attracted to you, why wouldn't you want to please him?  I do all sorts of things for my family that I do mainly because they enjoy it, but I also get satisfaction from helping them have those experiences, and I often enjoy the experiences as well.  It's no big deal.  It's just another way of showing love.
Some women misread the signs from their husbands.  They think they're rewarding their bad behavior by giving them sex even if they don't deserve it.  I think it's wrong to make sex something the man has to earn.  What a difficult way to live!  She's his only source for a legitimate need, and she agreed to that arrangement when she married him.
Ah yes, the post-nuptial intimate relations obstacle course.  Those courses can make what the Marines do look like toddler playgrounds.  So cruel.  So demeaning. 
In terms of "rewarding bad behavior," you could say I do a similar thing with my five year old daughter.  In terms of discipline, I am pretty calm and controlled and have some strategies I use, but if she's really hungry she becomes a monster and no amount of discipline strategies do much good.  I can tell when she's getting that way and I make it my first priority to give her food before getting all bent out of shape over her behavior.
I think that other people might take issue with that approach, but it sounds right on the money to me.  If someone you love is feeling a biological need, there is no purpose that I can see in deliberately making sure it is not met to make some kind of point about your own freedom, rights or authority.  If you love someone, be kind to them when they are in distress.  Pretty simple, unless you have some kind of agenda that encourages you to take stands at such times in order to make a point.
Some women really do punish their husbands with no sex on purpose, and I find that very cruel.  It's not a misreading of the signs.  Some actually sleep in a different room for a while to make a real statement about it.  There is no respect for the male body in that case.  They don't realize that they could actually have things a lot better if she gave it willingly and lovingly, as he would be so in love with her and inspired to do so much for her.
Of course it really happens.  People who say it doesn't are the romantic equivalent of Holocaust deniers.

The question is what civilized people should do to make sure it happens as rarely as possible, and it sounds like you are doing solid work in your home.

To jafs point about not wanting to be with someone who isn't in the mood to be with him, one of my assumptions in this discussion is that the woman in question could easily get into the mood if she wanted to, but for whatever reason has chosen not to make the small effort necessary to get in the mood, even though it would obviously bring her partner great pleasure if she did.  Any time a person intentionally doesn't do something minor that would result in a major benefit to someone else who cares about them deeply, that's normally labeled passive-aggressive behavior.  In other words, when you have someone needing love and affection and maybe even some Sexual Healing, you can say they are being childish for openly expressing their raw desire, or you could say the person holding back was being passive-aggressive for seeing that raw desire and making the conscious decision not to satisfy it.  Once again, the golden rule is helpful in figuring out whose position makes more sense.  I would say when given the choice to err on the side of passion or to err on the side of trivializing the passion of the person who loves you more than any else in the world, I would say err on the side of passion.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Gabe
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:46 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Gabe »

Pointedstick wrote: Although that Valentine's day gift is basically every man's dream come true, it's not the kind of thing that screams out "stable long-term relationship" to me. The ugly truth is that in a healthy and functional marriage, there's going to be a lot of dead time filled with boring stuff, drudgery, hard discussions of feelings and emotions, arguments, fights, hurt feelings, and the like. How the two partners deal with these stresses is one of the biggest things that I think determines the health of the marriage. Seekers of constant excitement, pleasure, and novelty will quickly tire of the boring regularity that inevitably creeps into every long-term relationship.

I'm glad you got to experience the dream, but don't let it change anything you were thinking before. You two are still in the courtship phase and that kind of thing is going to dry up once you're married. It has to; that kind of excitement can't be kept up for long in anybody without leading to burnout and exhaustion. A healthy marriage is much more of a marathon than a sprint.

Valentine's day threesomes are the granite countertops of a stable long-term relationship; the foundation is each partner's stability, emotional maturity, communication skills. If you've personally witnessed and experienced how both of you have those in spades, then go ahead and buy the granite countertops. ;)

Im my opinion, the best people to ask for marriage advice are those who have been married for multiple decades, and especially those who have been divorced once first. Their perspectives tend to be very wise. So Ignore all the crap I just said until I'm 70. ;D
Haha, looks like I just commandeered two threads. Guess that's what happens when you casually inject what amounts to a porn fantasy into serious conversation.

I totally agree with your assessment of what's important for the long-term, and had I not met her, I would have forever assumed (like everyone and their mother) that emotional maturity/communication skills and a propensity for kinky threesomes were mutually exclusive. I mean, threesomes are exclusively the domain of club-sluts with daddy issues doing lines off some rockstar's chest, right?

Her communication skills and willingness to a) express intense feelings in a non-combative, non-accusatory fashion, and b) ask me for exactly what she wants/needs without expecting me to read her mind (and resenting me when I fail to do so) are unlike anything I've ever experienced with a woman. Her more male disposition in terms of being direct is the source of constant exasperation with her female friends' complaints about their boyfriends/husbands, which she usually diagnoses as mostly her friends' faults for attempting to manipulate rather than communicate. From what I can gather, her rather unique attitude and capacity to engage with her emotions in this way resulted from sustained exposure to her mother's good example growing up, as well as a lot of deliberate practice and hard work on her part.

Considering marriage isn't a new post-Valentine's day conclusion. I started thinking she was the one within mere weeks of dating, and in all my previous relationship experiences, my head has never before gone there.

As for threesomes, we've had them with three other girls prior to this. She's truly wired differently when it comes to jealousy. She explained this to me a few times, but I didn't really believe her until the first time we actually had a threesome and I experienced not only the complete lack of jealousy, but the depth of her excitement and vicarious enjoyment at seeing me inside another girl. Leading up to the first time I must have initiated like 10 "are you sure?" conversations expressing that I didn't want to do it if there was the remotest possibility it was going to induce bad feelings for her.

As long as she knows I'm being completely honest with her in our relationship in general and feels secure in my love for her, she knows sex can be just sex, and doesn't feel threatened by other women if she's part of it. And it's not like it's just about me, she's thoroughly bisexual. Though the field admittedly borders on pseudo-science at times, evo psych would suggest that being in close proximity to other women desiring me heightens her appreciation of and attraction to me, but without the destructive downsides of jealousy in her case.

Compared to previous relationships, the freedom to express (and every once in a while follow up on) my physical attraction to other women without passive-aggressive jealous reprisals is unbelievably liberating. Not having to continually be in a state of hyper-vigilant self-censorship ("oh shit, hot girl, act like I don't notice her"), and in fact being able to share and enjoy that integral part of my psyche with her, has helped foster a level of honesty and intimacy unlike anything I've ever experienced. I also have noticed that I think about other women a lot less than I have in the past, and I suspect it's because they're no longer entirely off-limits. Forbidden fruit tastes the sweetest etc.

I, on the other hand, am not even remotely ok with other guys (girls are fine), and even her mentioning a previous sexual experience with a guy is liable to trigger all of my jealous, mate-guarding instincts. We've talked about it, and she's completely ok with the asymmetry here (like I said, not a feminist).

Though I haven't been married, I have to imagine that as long as it's honest and not to excess, the occasional injection of sexual novelty must surely aid in long-term marital satisfaction. At least or especially for a libidinous guy like myself that has historically experienced a relatively high degree of sexual choice. Freud once said (I think in a letter to Jung?) that the only recipe he'd found for a happy marriage was a license for infidelity.

But anyway, while this element of our relationship is interesting because it's rather unusual, it's sort of off-topic because it's, as you say, the "granite countertop" of our relationship - not the criteria by which I'm evaluating her suitability as a long-term partner.

People tend to have very strong Judeo-Christian influenced opinions about this kind of thing, which would unfairly lead them to question her and my judgment in general. People with those opinions may still have tremendously valuable insights to offer about relationships and marriage in other respects, and I'd rather them honing in on our sexual deviancy not obstruct my being able to learn from them.
Last edited by Gabe on Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Libertarian666 »

Pointedstick wrote: Im my opinion, the best people to ask for marriage advice are those who have been married for multiple decades, and especially those who have been divorced once first. Their perspectives tend to be very wise. So Ignore all the crap I just said until I'm 70. ;D
Well, I've been married for almost 20 years and was married once before for 10 years, terminated by my telling my previous wife I wanted a divorce after she told me not to wake her up if I had to drive myself to the hospital.

So I guess I'm the perfect man to give relationship advice!
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

I do wonder a few things about why so many women are so frigid about sex, whereas many men seem immune to that.  I think it may have something to do with parents being physically unaffectionate with their children and/or shaming them for nudity or masturbation, as well as being unwilling to talk about it. 

My mother had some issues, but she was very good about never making me feel ashamed of my body growing up, and she was very open with me about sex.  She's an ObGyn, so she's used to talking about it all the time anyway.  My five-year-old daughter recently was asking me about how babies are made, so I did my best not to sound uncomfortable and answered all her questions using all the correct words.  She seemed genuinely curious in a completely innocent way, and it was actually a pretty fun conversation.  I think so many parents are terrified to talk about it though.  They don't know when to broach the topic and don't follow the child's lead and interest.

I'm just speculating here.  My sister in law is so uncomfortable with her body she won't even let her husband see her naked.  I know her mother was very unaffectionate growing up so I'm assuming her upbringing had something to do with it.  And now she's doing the exact same thing with her kids.  My guess is that men in general don't have as much trouble opening up to feeling sexual because their sex drives are just so high.

What do some of you think about the couples where the man rarely wants sex and the wife is feeling deprived?  I think those are less common but they do happen too.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Libertarian666 »

I just wanted to add that MediumTex's latest contribution is right on the money. Thanks!
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Libertarian666 wrote: I just wanted to add that MediumTex's latest contribution is right on the money. Thanks!
I agree.
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Gabe wrote:
Pointedstick wrote: Although that Valentine's day gift is basically every man's dream come true, it's not the kind of thing that screams out "stable long-term relationship" to me. The ugly truth is that in a healthy and functional marriage, there's going to be a lot of dead time filled with boring stuff, drudgery, hard discussions of feelings and emotions, arguments, fights, hurt feelings, and the like. How the two partners deal with these stresses is one of the biggest things that I think determines the health of the marriage. Seekers of constant excitement, pleasure, and novelty will quickly tire of the boring regularity that inevitably creeps into every long-term relationship.

I'm glad you got to experience the dream, but don't let it change anything you were thinking before. You two are still in the courtship phase and that kind of thing is going to dry up once you're married. It has to; that kind of excitement can't be kept up for long in anybody without leading to burnout and exhaustion. A healthy marriage is much more of a marathon than a sprint.

Valentine's day threesomes are the granite countertops of a stable long-term relationship; the foundation is each partner's stability, emotional maturity, communication skills. If you've personally witnessed and experienced how both of you have those in spades, then go ahead and buy the granite countertops. ;)

Im my opinion, the best people to ask for marriage advice are those who have been married for multiple decades, and especially those who have been divorced once first. Their perspectives tend to be very wise. So Ignore all the crap I just said until I'm 70. ;D
Haha, looks like I just commandeered two threads. Guess that's what happens when you casually inject what amounts to a porn fantasy into serious conversation.

I totally agree with your assessment of what's important for the long-term, and had I not met her, I would have forever assumed (like everyone and their mother) that emotional maturity/communication skills and a propensity for kinky threesomes were mutually exclusive. I mean, threesomes are exclusively the domain of club-sluts with daddy issues doing lines off some rockstar's chest, right?

Her communication skills and willingness to a) express intense feelings in a non-combative, non-accusatory fashion, and b) ask me for exactly what she wants/needs without expecting me to read her mind (and resenting me when I fail to do so) are unlike anything I've ever experienced with a woman. Her more male disposition in terms of being direct is the source of constant exasperation with her female friends' complaints about their boyfriends/husbands, which she usually diagnoses as mostly her friends' faults for attempting to manipulate rather than communicate. From what I can gather, her rather unique attitude and capacity to engage with her emotions in this way resulted from sustained exposure to her mother's good example growing up, as well as a lot of deliberate practice and hard work on her part.

Considering marriage isn't a new post-Valentine's day conclusion. I started thinking she was the one within mere weeks of dating, and in all my previous relationship experiences, my head has never before gone there.

As for threesomes, we've had them with three other girls prior to this. She's truly wired differently when it comes to jealousy. She explained this to me a few times, but I didn't really believe her until the first time we actually had a threesome and I experienced not only the complete lack of jealousy, but the depth of her excitement and vicarious enjoyment at seeing me inside another girl. Leading up to the first time I must have initiated like 10 "are you sure?" conversations expressing that I didn't want to do it if there was the remotest possibility it was going to induce bad feelings for her.

As long as she knows I'm being completely honest with her in our relationship in general and feels secure in my love for her, she knows sex can be just sex, and doesn't feel threatened by other women if she's part of it. And it's not like it's just about me, she's thoroughly bisexual. Though the field admittedly borders on pseudo-science at times, evo psych would suggest that being in close proximity to other women desiring me heightens her appreciation of and attraction to me, but without the destructive downsides of jealousy in her case.

Compared to previous relationships, the freedom to express (and every once in a while follow up on) my physical attraction to other women without passive-aggressive jealous reprisals is unbelievably liberating. Not having to continually be in a state of hyper-vigilant self-censorship ("oh shit, hot girl, act like I don't notice her"), and in fact being able to share and enjoy that integral part of my psyche with her, has helped foster a level of honesty and intimacy unlike anything I've ever experienced. I also have noticed that I think about other women a lot less than I have in the past, and I suspect it's because they're no longer entirely off-limits. Forbidden fruit tastes the sweetest etc.

I, on the other hand, am not even remotely ok with other guys (girls are fine), and even her mentioning a previous sexual experience with a guy is liable to trigger all of my jealous, mate-guarding instincts. We've talked about it, and she's completely ok with the asymmetry here (like I said, not a feminist).

Though I haven't been married, I have to imagine that as long as it's honest and not to excess, the occasional injection of sexual novelty must surely aid in long-term marital satisfaction. At least or especially for a libidinous guy like myself that has historically experienced a relatively high degree of sexual choice. Freud once said (I think in a letter to Jung?) that the only recipe he'd found for a happy marriage was a license for infidelity.

But anyway, while this element of our relationship is interesting because it's rather unusual, it's sort of off-topic because it's, as you say, the "granite countertop" of our relationship - not the criteria by which I'm evaluating her suitability as a long-term partner.

People tend to have very strong Judeo-Christian influenced opinions about this kind of thing, which would unfairly lead them to question her and my judgment in general. People with those opinions may still have tremendously valuable insights to offer about relationships and marriage in other respects, and I'd rather them honing in on our sexual deviancy not obstruct my being able to learn from them.
To each his own.  If you're both happy, that's great.  I actually had the hunch it wasn't just because she loves you so much, it's also really fun for her.  And the fact that she is so honest is very good.

She may settle down more as she gets older and also she may get more fearful of worst case scenarios.  Do you worry about the other girls getting attached?  The biggest fear for me would be diseases or unwanted pregnancies. 
Gabe
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:46 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Gabe »

Michellebell wrote: To each his own.  If you're both happy, that's great.  I actually had the hunch it wasn't just because she loves you so much, it's also really fun for her.  And the fact that she is so honest is very good.

She may settle down more as she gets older and also she may get more fearful of worst case scenarios.  Do you worry about the other girls getting attached?  The biggest fear for me would be diseases or unwanted pregnancies.
We've talked about it and decided that if that scenario were ever to arise and a girl started angling for more we'd cut it off immediately. Seeing as she thinks highly of me, she actually expects that this will probably happen at some point. But I think another girl getting attached could only happen if we slept with the same girl on a fairly frequent, repeated basis and that's not something we've tried.
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Gabe wrote:
Michellebell wrote: To each his own.  If you're both happy, that's great.  I actually had the hunch it wasn't just because she loves you so much, it's also really fun for her.  And the fact that she is so honest is very good.

She may settle down more as she gets older and also she may get more fearful of worst case scenarios.  Do you worry about the other girls getting attached?  The biggest fear for me would be diseases or unwanted pregnancies.
We've talked about it and decided that if that scenario were ever to arise and a girl started angling for more we'd cut it off immediately. Seeing as she thinks highly of me, she actually expects that this will probably happen at some point. But I think another girl getting attached could only happen if we slept with the same girl on a fairly frequent, repeated basis and that's not something we've tried.
When I think of the concept of love, I think it means to truly want that person to feel happy and fulfilled without expecting anything in return.  It means not being possessive.  In that context, if I truly love my husband, I would be fine with allowing him the sexual freedom to be with whomever else he chooses.  It would be an act of fun and fulfillment that may have nothing to do with me.  He may be highly satisfied with me but still find it enjoyable to have sex with another.

Objectively that makes sense.  But I guess I can't love that selflessly.  Even if it means I'm not as secure or loving as I could be, I'm okay with saying, no one else!

To me I feel safest this way.
Gabe
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:46 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Gabe »

Michellebell wrote:
Gabe wrote:
Michellebell wrote: To each his own.  If you're both happy, that's great.  I actually had the hunch it wasn't just because she loves you so much, it's also really fun for her.  And the fact that she is so honest is very good.

She may settle down more as she gets older and also she may get more fearful of worst case scenarios.  Do you worry about the other girls getting attached?  The biggest fear for me would be diseases or unwanted pregnancies.
We've talked about it and decided that if that scenario were ever to arise and a girl started angling for more we'd cut it off immediately. Seeing as she thinks highly of me, she actually expects that this will probably happen at some point. But I think another girl getting attached could only happen if we slept with the same girl on a fairly frequent, repeated basis and that's not something we've tried.
When I think of the concept of love, I think it means to truly want that person to feel happy and fulfilled without expecting anything in return.  It means not being possessive.  In that context, if I truly love my husband, I would be fine with allowing him the sexual freedom to be with whomever else he chooses.  It would be an act of fun and fulfillment that may have nothing to do with me.  He may be highly satisfied with me but still find it enjoyable to have sex with another.

Objectively that makes sense.  But I guess I can't love that selflessly.  Even if it means I'm not as secure or loving as I could be, I'm okay with saying, no one else!

To me I feel safest this way.
Yeah, that's exactly how I view it. Most of us just aren't capable of loving quite that selflessly. It's evolutionarily maladaptive, and consequently humans who have been capable of it are almost certain to have been outcompeted and ousted from the gene pool.
User avatar
Austen Heller
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:58 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Austen Heller »

Fun times over here on this thread.

"I came to learn about bonds and gold, but I stuck around for the discussion on orgies."

Gabe, I'll be picturing you like this from now on:
Image
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by MediumTex »

Austen Heller wrote: Fun times over here on this thread.

"I came to learn about bonds and gold, but I stuck around for the discussion on orgies."

Gabe, I'll be picturing you like this from now on:
Image
I don't think the forum has gone downhill at all.  :)
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

MangoMan wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Austen Heller wrote: Fun times over here on this thread.

"I came to learn about bonds and gold, but I stuck around for the discussion on orgies."
I don't think the forum has gone downhill at all.  :)
No kidding. The forum has always been great, but the recent discussions on relationships have been riveting.
It's all because I showed up :)

No just kidding...

Really these discussions are so fascinating because these are the discussions we are all too afraid to have in real life except with our spouses or partners.  Really, if I started talking about relationships and sex with any man in real life he would probably think I was hitting on him, and people in real life are too timid to reveal all their intimate details. 

But online you're so protected so you feel much more bold.  These discussions answer a lot of questions you always wonder about other peoples' private lives and wonder how "normal" your life is compared to theirs.
Libertarian666
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5994
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Libertarian666 »

Michellebell wrote:
MangoMan wrote:
MediumTex wrote: I don't think the forum has gone downhill at all.  :)
No kidding. The forum has always been great, but the recent discussions on relationships have been riveting.
It's all because I showed up :)

No just kidding...

Really these discussions are so fascinating because these are the discussions we are all too afraid to have in real life except with our spouses or partners.  Really, if I started talking about relationships and sex with any man in real life he would probably think I was hitting on him, and people in real life are too timid to reveal all their intimate details. 

But online you're so protected so you feel much more bold.  These discussions answer a lot of questions you always wonder about other peoples' private lives and wonder how "normal" your life is compared to theirs.
Yes, it is dangerous to talk about emotional issues with opposite-sex people in real life, as that tends to form an emotional bond.

Fortunately no one ever runs into that problem with online interactions!  :P
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5080
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Mountaineer »

Michellebell wrote:
MangoMan wrote:
MediumTex wrote: I don't think the forum has gone downhill at all.  :)
No kidding. The forum has always been great, but the recent discussions on relationships have been riveting.
It's all because I showed up :)

No just kidding...

Really these discussions are so fascinating because these are the discussions we are all too afraid to have in real life except with our spouses or partners.  Really, if I started talking about relationships and sex with any man in real life he would probably think I was hitting on him, and people in real life are too timid to reveal all their intimate details. 

But online you're so protected so you feel much more bold.  These discussions answer a lot of questions you always wonder about other peoples' private lives and wonder how "normal" your life is compared to theirs.
A question:  what are you going to do with that information?  If not actionable, it is merely entertainment IMHO, about on the level of what I could find out in National Inquirer.  And yes, unless there is really some gem lurking in the answer, it is just for entertainment.  This is kind of like asking another guy how big his is?  Not much I can do with the answer.  Viva la Star Wars - good entertainment but fantasy.  ;D

... M
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Mountaineer wrote:
Michellebell wrote:
MangoMan wrote: No kidding. The forum has always been great, but the recent discussions on relationships have been riveting.
It's all because I showed up :)

No just kidding...

Really these discussions are so fascinating because these are the discussions we are all too afraid to have in real life except with our spouses or partners.  Really, if I started talking about relationships and sex with any man in real life he would probably think I was hitting on him, and people in real life are too timid to reveal all their intimate details. 

But online you're so protected so you feel much more bold.  These discussions answer a lot of questions you always wonder about other peoples' private lives and wonder how "normal" your life is compared to theirs.
A question:  what are you going to do with that information?  If not actionable, it is merely entertainment IMHO, about on the level of what I could find out in National Inquirer.  And yes, unless there is really some gem lurking in the answer, it is just for entertainment.  This is kind of like asking another guy how big his is?  Not much I can do with the answer.  Viva la Star Wars - good entertainment but fantasy.  ;D

... M
I agree most of it is purely for entertainment.  I think most of the talking I do is for entertainment actually. 

Obviously at work I speak with a purpose.  With my husband, we have to talk about our upcoming responsibilities or errands, but most of what I talk about with him or with friends is stuff I find interesting but doesn't serve a purpose.  Socializing is just a way to pass the time in a lot of instances, I think.  Life would be kind of bland without it.

Some of the things we've been talking about though does serve a purpose of sharing opinions and helping other people form their opinions about society.  For example if we are talking about messages in the media and cultural values, we may be opening each others' eyes to issues they had not thought about before.  Talking in this manner fosters social change.
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5080
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Mountaineer »

Michellebell wrote:
Mountaineer wrote:
Michellebell wrote: It's all because I showed up :)

No just kidding...

Really these discussions are so fascinating because these are the discussions we are all too afraid to have in real life except with our spouses or partners.  Really, if I started talking about relationships and sex with any man in real life he would probably think I was hitting on him, and people in real life are too timid to reveal all their intimate details. 

But online you're so protected so you feel much more bold.  These discussions answer a lot of questions you always wonder about other peoples' private lives and wonder how "normal" your life is compared to theirs.
A question:  what are you going to do with that information?  If not actionable, it is merely entertainment IMHO, about on the level of what I could find out in National Inquirer.  And yes, unless there is really some gem lurking in the answer, it is just for entertainment.  This is kind of like asking another guy how big his is?  Not much I can do with the answer.  Viva la Star Wars - good entertainment but fantasy.  ;D

... M
I agree most of it is purely for entertainment.  I think most of the talking I do is for entertainment actually. 

Obviously at work I speak with a purpose.  With my husband, we have to talk about our upcoming responsibilities or errands, but most of what I talk about with him or with friends is stuff I find interesting but doesn't serve a purpose.  Socializing is just a way to pass the time in a lot of instances, I think.  Life would be kind of bland without it.

Some of the things we've been talking about though does serve a purpose of sharing opinions and helping other people form their opinions about society.  For example if we are talking about messages in the media and cultural values, we may be opening each others' eyes to issues they had not thought about before.  Talking in this manner fosters social change.
Thank you for responding. 

... M
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
Michellebell
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm

Re: Men, women and sex

Post by Michellebell »

Okay so now back to talking about men, women, and sex...

I had recently been reading about some relationships and was giving some advice too and came across the concept of husbands having really low libido.  I have some ideas about this.  We already talked about how men have much higher sex drives than women because they have much more testosterone.  Plus women are only fertile for short times each month so it makes sense their sex drive is usually lower, whereas men's are steady.  So I think that when the husband is hardly ever in the mood, aside from medical reasons, it might have to do mostly with resentment.

The first time I ever heard a woman complain about a low male sex drive was a friend of mine.  I remember when she married him, shortly after I got married myself, she was saying how great it was to find a beta male.  I had never heard of the concept before actually , so she explained it to me.  I was like, what?  That's what we are supposed to like?  Anyway, about a year later she was saying how she was annoyed that she was paying $30 a month for birth control pills and he was only willing to sleep with her once a month.  She was saying how cost inefficient that was.  I was like, woah, because I had never experienced that.

However there have been two times my husband hasn't been interested in it with me, and they were both in a direct response to my behavior.  The most recent time was when I was pregnant with my daughters.  With my second daughter it was the worst.  I hated it!  Sometimes I'd think, maybe I should just force myself since it's been a really long time, but it would feel sooo bad, and he knew it, so he stopped trying.  He was really nice about it because he knew I had a very legitimate excuse, it was temporary, and it was nothing personal against him.

The other time it was so long ago I can barely remember it.  When we fight, he usually is not interested, and we were fighting a lot one summer.  I had made the mistake of talking about him to my friends (really bad habit, I finally learned), and they convinced me that the whole dynamic of our relationship was wrong.  So I decided to fight, demand more, try to control him more.  He wasn't pleased and was pushing back and we had a horrible summer.  Toward the end of it though, it was like he started to cave, was finally like, "okay!!  I give up, just please stop fighting with me!"  So I was finally thinking we were on our way up and would be fine...

But then, I was feeling all loving again and wanted to reconnect and have sex but he wasn't in the mood anymore.  I was like, what what what???  Since when had he ever been "not in the mood"? 

I realized that by "winning" I had just succeeded in getting him to comply with me but completely emasculated him.  Our sex life was always one of the strongest things we had going for us.  I was like, oh no this will not work for me.  So I changed my tune and started treated him much better and we became really close again very shortly after that.

I know that's a really long story but my thoughts are that in other couples it may not be so obvious what is happening. The husband might resent his wife but not want to come across as a complainer or as domineering, so he just keeps it all in and doesn't bother to work it out, all while becoming less attracted to his wife.

I don't know if there's much truth to that.  I'm just kind of thinking aloud at this point.
Last edited by Michellebell on Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply