dragoncar wrote: Salt?

Moderator: Global Moderator
dragoncar wrote: Salt?
I agree that it is wise to hold some gold. I do it. If I were running a pension fund or managing the cash of a company, I would do it then. But I am definitely not keeping my funds in it by default. I can't pay taxes in gold, and I can't buy other assets with it either. I understand that is because of laws, and gold will outlive those laws. But not in my time frame.Libertarian666 wrote:How about a "currency" that no one can issue arbitrarily, but has to be "mined" and is therefore fairly static in quantity? And what if it also had uses besides as money, like in industry, and had a multi-thousand year record of never becoming worthless? Of course there isn't anything like that, but suppose there was...Lowe wrote: Let us say the treasury issues a lot more debt. Enough that it isn't just a quarter or a third of the US debt market. It's half, or three quarters even. For the sake of safety and reducing the volatility of their cash, banks, corporations, and pension funds will still be vying to buy up those new bonds. Whether the Fed keeps buying up some of them doesn't matter. Someone is still going to buy and hold them, even when they are at 0%.
There is no beating the safety of bonds in developed countries with productive people. That's why German and US bonds are where they are now. The Fed doesn't have the power to change that. If they try they will fail.
It might be different if the world weren't filling up with unproductive people, trying their best to live off other people's efforts. But it is, and those growing populations aren't inflationary. They are deflationary, because they do not create much commercial value themselves, and cannot command competitive wages. The only way they live is by producers giving them things, which deflates prices.
The dollar, euro, or yen doesn't have to be strong against some abstract standard. It just has to be stronger than everything else. Nobody going to run out of those currencies in a hurry, because there are no trustworthy alternatives. What banker or businessperson would put his or his clients' money in the currency of South Africa, or Chile, or Egypt, or even China or Taiwan? That is crazy.
Lowe,Lowe wrote: Gold rises during run-ups in physical assets, like land, energy, and consumable items like food and clothing. These are caused by increases in the number and size of productive families, or the purchasing power of those families. This causes inflation in physical goods, which bites into the real return of fixed income assets (and equity to an extent). Gold is sought as an alternative.
I don't believe there is another way for gold to rise, than that....
portart wrote: The strong dollar seems to be killing gold, period. All other currencies suck. The winner is the US buck. As long as that is the case, gold will be sold for dollars. Not sure what can change that but something will. As a PP holder, you feel the pain of 25% gold being cut to ribbons.
Yeah, it helps if we want to travel to Europe. Or you can say that we have immediately become wealthier relative to people in other parts of the world even though we may not feel it. This was a favorite point of Kshartle's when he was still around. If an American works abroad and negotiates contracts in local currencies, the stronger dollar is bad. It's also bad for those trying to peddle American goods abroad. I guess much depends on on your vantage point.bedraggled wrote: Since we are citizens/ residents of USA, and living in USA to boot, does that not mean we are in for favorable times? Speaking narrowly, as we have USD in our wallets and not Euros.
I don't see any evidence that the US is yet, but the rest of the world certainly is... so they're gonna make an already bad situation much worse by sending capital flows here pushing up the dollar, stocks and bonds even more. What's their alternative? Structural reforms? HAHAHAHA. Just you wait until all their sovereign debt valued in USD starts imploding.bedraggled wrote: Could it be that our Dollar is stronger because we are in deflation?
CRB, CU, OIL and DXY suggest deflation.
Negative interest rates, here we come?
Well, if government wasn't staffed by the dumbest people on planet Earth, they could coordinate an effective counter-deflation policy right at the very beginning of it, but I'm not holding even an iota of breath. And bailing out the banking system with QEternity is hardly what I mean.bedraggled wrote: Good point and it all may happen anyway. Does the cyclical nature of things demand deflation?
Indeed. How many bushels is that equal to?Desert wrote:That was beautiful.Kriegsspiel wrote: I, for one, welcome deflation. What with my goddamn fuck ton of cash and bonds.
You are leveraging now? Meaning the 8.3% in 3x fund approach?buddtholomew wrote: It's the dot plots you see...
What the hell just happened...FED removes "patience" from their commentary and reinforces they will not raise interest rates in April. June is still a possibility.
Stocks, Gold and Treasuries rally on the news and the USD is crushed against the EUR. It's as if up is down and down is up. Go figure. Glad I hold all 3 leveraged assets @ approximately 25% on days like today. Really nice to see gold move up as well.
No. Apologize for the confusion as I was using "leveraged" to refer to SPY, GLD and TLT with Cash being un-leveraged.dragoncar wrote:You are leveraging now? Meaning the 8.3% in 3x fund approach?buddtholomew wrote: It's the dot plots you see...
What the hell just happened...FED removes "patience" from their commentary and reinforces they will not raise interest rates in April. June is still a possibility.
Stocks, Gold and Treasuries rally on the news and the USD is crushed against the EUR. It's as if up is down and down is up. Go figure. Glad I hold all 3 leveraged assets @ approximately 25% on days like today. Really nice to see gold move up as well.
It's called short covering.buddtholomew wrote: What the hell just happened...FED removes "patience" from their commentary and reinforces they will not raise interest rates in April. June is still a possibility.
Stocks, Gold and Treasuries rally on the news and the USD is crushed against the EUR. It's as if up is down and down is up. Go figure. Glad I hold all 3 leveraged assets @ approximately 25% on days like today. Really nice to see gold move up as well.
That was my guess, so we will have to see which assets have follow through tomorrow.MachineGhost wrote:It's called short covering.buddtholomew wrote: What the hell just happened...FED removes "patience" from their commentary and reinforces they will not raise interest rates in April. June is still a possibility.
Stocks, Gold and Treasuries rally on the news and the USD is crushed against the EUR. It's as if up is down and down is up. Go figure. Glad I hold all 3 leveraged assets @ approximately 25% on days like today. Really nice to see gold move up as well.
That might have helped somewhat, but yes I do think it was driven mostly by demographics. There was a small bulge in the US demographic pyramid passing through late adolescence and early adulthood at that time. I also think the policies of the Bush administration encouraged a lot of illegal immigration, which helped with the run up in physical goods.barrett wrote:Lowe,Lowe wrote: Gold rises during run-ups in physical assets, like land, energy, and consumable items like food and clothing. These are caused by increases in the number and size of productive families, or the purchasing power of those families. This causes inflation in physical goods, which bites into the real return of fixed income assets (and equity to an extent). Gold is sought as an alternative.
I don't believe there is another way for gold to rise, than that....
Serious question... Do you think what you outlined above explains the massive rise in gold during the 2000s?
After the real estate bubble burst, gold continued to rise for another three years or so.
My own thought is that there was a general loss of confidence in the US$ during that ten-year period. Seemed like everyone was talking about the Euro, Renminbi or whatever... that the US$ was going to get bumped from its place at the top of the mountain.
+1buddtholomew wrote: I wouldn't get overly excited. My guess is that gold plummets and treasuries rise after the FED speaks this week - basically the opposite of what we have witnessed in the last couple of days. Perhaps it's the pessimist in me, but I've seen this act before...over and over and over...again.