Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Moderator: Global Moderator
Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Why not BRKB: Berkshire Hathaway INC for the stock portion of the Permanent Portfolio?
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15220
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Not enough volatility.
Too many eggs in one basket.
Manager risk.
A fine vp choice, though.
Too many eggs in one basket.
Manager risk.
A fine vp choice, though.
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
One advantage is no dividends if you are accumulatingmukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Berkshire Hathaway is a multinational conglomeration of a diverse array of stocks picked by a guy who has beaten the S&P repeatedly, and with lower fees than any ETF.mukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Tracking error?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:20 am
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
The guys running Berkshire are getting very old. An article on cbsmarketwatch.com said their new hires did not beat the s & p 500 in 2014.
The no fees idea is nice but VTI may be the better bet.
The no fees idea is nice but VTI may be the better bet.
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Yeah, I'm wondering what'll happen to Berkshire Hathaway when Buffett departs. What'll be it's price? and will it even continue to trade?bedraggled wrote: The guys running Berkshire are getting very old. An article on cbsmarketwatch.com said their new hires did not beat the s & p 500 in 2014.
The no fees idea is nice but VTI may be the better bet.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:20 am
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
In Buffett videos on Youtube, Warren suggested the returns for Berkshire would approach normalcy.
The new people, who probably will not have Buffett's or Munger's talent, may effect just that.
The new people, who probably will not have Buffett's or Munger's talent, may effect just that.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 15220
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
However, it's very telling that that guy who has beaten the S&P has chosen the S&P as the investment for his progeny. Just google it even you haven't seen it already: Buffett wants his heirs to use 90% S&P, 10% cash or short-term treasuries. Not Berkshire shares.robtkatz wrote:Berkshire Hathaway is a multinational conglomeration of a diverse array of stocks picked by a guy who has beaten the S&P repeatedly, and with lower fees than any ETF.mukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:01 pm
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
There may be more underlying the story of why he wants his heirs to be in the S&P500. IIRC, Buffett has some very strong beliefs around not giving his heirs a lot of wealth. He has a "I worked hard, so you have to make your own way" type of mentality. He's definitely not solving for maximizing his heirs' wealth when it comes to all his decisions.
More telling would be what he's doing with money that he plans to donate or go to causes that he cares about, beyond enriching his "lucky sperm club" members.
More telling would be what he's doing with money that he plans to donate or go to causes that he cares about, beyond enriching his "lucky sperm club" members.
- MachineGhost
- Executive Member
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am
Re: Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Its all going to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which, so far, aren't careerists.Sam Brazil wrote: More telling would be what he's doing with money that he plans to donate or go to causes that he cares about, beyond enriching his "lucky sperm club" members.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet. I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!