Mutual funds versus ETFS??

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
coinstar
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:02 pm

Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by coinstar »

Is there a difference at all in safety between mutual funds and ETFS? My thoughts are as follows below:

Mutual funds that are open end, always trade exactly at NAV, at the end of the closing day so your buying them for the correct price exactly.

ETFS trade at premiums or discounts throughout the day so sometimes you get a good deal and sometimes you don't. Usually its that you do not.

ETFS trade at a spread irregardless of the the discount/premium and you ALWAYS lose a little bit on the spread both when you BUY and SELL.

Mutual funds in theory have additional expenses because the mutual fund manager has to maintain share ownership/transaction information of the fund holders and do communication with them and send tax forms and such. Whereas with an ETF, the ETF management outsources that task to the brokerage firms that investors trade the ETFS on.

ETFS are more liquid than mutual funds because if the stock market drops 50% in one day, intraday, you can buy more of the ETFS immediately to rebalance back into stocks as you sell some of your bond ETFS (which would probably be up 50% on a day the stock market is down 50%!!). If you use mutual funds then you have to wait until the end of the business day. So if you sell your bond ETFS mid-day at a 50% gain, and then make a mutual fund stock buy order, but by the end of the day, the 50% drop reduced down to a 30% drop, you spent much more for the mutual fund than you would have otherwise been able to buy the ETF version mid-day.

If your using Vanguard funds, its my understanding the ETFS are just a different share class than the mutual funds and you can convert your mutual fund into an ETF version for free, without incurring a taxable event. Don't think you can go the other way around though??

If your a compulsive portfolio checker, ETFS change their price throughout the day so you can see how your PP is doing mid-day without having to wait until the end of day for the NAV to close. This could actually be a bad thing if your trying to avoid over checking your PP!!

Because of the point about not having to wait until the end of the trading day during a big crash, I found that I prefer ETFS over mutual funds, in spite of the small premium/spread cost. However, if you really think about it, the problem occurs when trying to sell or buy a mutual fund mid-day in a blackened swan event. So if you have at least half of each asset in a non-mutual fund version, then you should be okay.

Technically, going by pure PP, the only asset that should be in an ETF/mutual fund is stocks. Because your better off holding gold coins, individual bonds, and individual treasury bills. Some of us like myself have paper gold, but there's no "mutual fund" for paper gold, they are all ETFS or ETNS anyway, so no discussion needed. It really comes down to the stocks.

Part of me feels like mutual funds are "safer" than ETFS but maybe that part of me is the old stogey who's pumping his fist at kids in his lawn. If so, then maybe splitting my Vanguard stock holdings into an ETF and a mutual fund 50-50 makes sense so I can quickly liquidate the ETF in the event the stock market doubles in one day. But then again, realistically, I should be okay keeping a mere 20% of my total stock holdings in ETFS because if the stock market rises to a rebalancing band point, that 20% of the stocks because quite bigger.

Then again, because its my understanding the ETFS and Mutual Fund version of the same fund at Vanguard is really the same thing, it probably doesn't make a difference if it's an ETF or a Mutual fund. PERHAPS the best alternative is to continue holding the ETFS I currently have, and when it comes time to buy MORE stocks, I put in a buy order for the mutual fund.

Because when I am buying more stocks on a regular day, I don't need to "lock in" on the intra-day price because the price fluctuation throughout the day doesn't matter too much. Maybe I'm getting a better deal by buying mid-day and maybe I'm not. Who knows? It really could go either way. However, by buying at the END of the day, with the mutual fund, the one thing I do know is I'm buying at NAV and there's no spread. So I'm getting the best possible deal. Also, I think the ETF holders are subsidizing the Mutual Fund holders of the manager administration cost of dealing with mutual fund shareholders. So in that respect, maybe the Mutual Fund is getting a better deal? :)

Anyone know if I can convert ETFS to Mutual Funds of the same fund at Vanguard? If so, I may convert a large chunk of my existing holdings just for the heck of it. Or maybe it really doesn't matter once I already hold them because I ate the expense of the premium/spread when I first bought them??
User avatar
KevinW
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 945
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by KevinW »

In the steady state a PP only transacts stocks maybe 0-2 times per year, so the differences in how they trade are not really significant. It's true that ETFs have the disadvantage of potential bid-ask spreads and mutual funds have the disadvantage of ever-so-slightly-higher expense ratios, but I think these end up being a wash. Mutual funds have one less layer of counterparty risk since the transactions go directly between the buyer and seller while ETFs have the additional layer of going through an exchange. The probability of this causing problems is remote, but not zero; the 2010 flash crash is still in recent memory. For that reason I have a slight preference for mutual funds held directly with their sponsor. That said, I am comfortable with ETFs and use them.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by MachineGhost »

Mutual funds have additional expenses not reflected in the expense ratio.  I don't know if ETF's have the same negative.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by MachineGhost »

MangoMan wrote: Like what?
I was thinking of trading costs, but there are three others.

http://www.doughroller.net/investing/th ... ual-funds/
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
whatchamacallit
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by whatchamacallit »

MachineGhost wrote:
MangoMan wrote: Like what?
I was thinking of trading costs, but there are three others.

http://www.doughroller.net/investing/th ... ual-funds/
That is good information and another good reason to stay with index funds.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15262
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by dualstow »

When you sell shares of Vanguard mutual funds, you can sell again tomorrow, but you may have to wait two months to buy back. That doesn't bother me and in fact I use mutual funds for stocks.
RIP BRIAN WILSON
User avatar
KevinW
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 945
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Mutual funds versus ETFS??

Post by KevinW »

MangoMan wrote: The counterparty risk is basically the same, unless the MF is held by the issuing company. I used to hold PRPFX at Schwab, so there was no additional counterparty risk compared to holding VTI there. I suppose you could eliminate the second level of risk by buying Schwab's own ETFs at Schwab, or Vanguard MFs at Vanguard.
Yeah, I think the ideal policy is to hold mutual funds directly with their sponsor, i.e. hold Vanguard funds at Vanguard, Fidelity funds at Fidelity, etc. Browne suggested splitting stocks across 2-3 funds.
Post Reply