And Lowe wrote:
I understand that part of the deal with the PP is that one of the assets should be performing badly
Moderator: Global Moderator
I understand that part of the deal with the PP is that one of the assets should be performing badly
Yeah, you've mentioned it before, maybe in this thread. It's truer every time.buddtholomew wrote:Lowe, we are living the same life. Tax-deferred assets entirely in a BH portfolio. I've been buying gold since 2011 and currently am down almost 25% on this asset. I keep telling myself to look at the PP as a whole, but a CAGR of almost 4% isn't too reassuring either.Lowe wrote: You know, back in the 70's there was a good demographic reasons for a run up in the price of consumable goods. Namely, the baby boom. Babies born in the late 40s and the 50s were entering adulthood, and starting to buy cars, gas, and land. It would be interesting to see the relationship between nominal rates and inflation in that period, which as we know brought about gold's all time peak.
Is there a comparable demographic cause for the more recent run up in gold? What was the reason that people were buying houses in greater numbers, anyway?
...
For three years, every time I have rebalanced into gold, I have gotten burned (in that asset). I understand that part of the deal with the PP is that one of the assets should be performing badly. However at this point I feel like I am walking into a trap that I know is there. I don't expect to see gold prices rise till I am gray. I am happy that my 401k, at least, is in a Boglehead portfolio.
Funny how the portfolio that is supposed to allow me to sleep at night is the one that keeps me wide awake...
So true, iwealth. Well put. I would also add that many of us (me included) seem to be paying a little too much attention to what has happened to the PP in the last five minutes. Any asset allocation should be scrutinized from all sides, but at a certain point you just have to let it do its thing or you can drive yourself nuts. My own goal is to keep myself and my wife financially comfortable for the next 40 years. All investments are bound to have bad patches during that kind of time horizon.iwealth wrote: I've concluded that it's nearly impossible to contently hold this portfolio if your comparison index of choice is the SP500 or a 60/40 stock/bond portfolio...have to be happy with beating inflation by a few ticks over the years or move on to something more "risky".
100% of my variable portfolio is in GDX as well. I almost need a 100% return to breakeven. Feel completely trapped, but will only purchase additional lots if re-balancing bands are breached. I am well within tolerances after averaging down. Sad to be honest.portart wrote: My Variable is all in GDX and GDXJ. Still holding but losing money in hard bunches. I know a way to get it to reverse...sell it.
+1. It's all about perspective.iwealth wrote: If stocks were in the midst of a 50% correction, there'd be a lot of cheering around here about the PP holding its ground while those crazy stock-heavy investors got what was coming to them. Now gold is in the midst of a 50% correction or so, and there's gnashing of teeth and anger over low single-digit CAGRs. It's easy to overlook that relative to a 100% gold portfolio, (or a 60% gold/40% whatever portfolio) the PP is holding its ground.
The extent of my Stockholm syndrome is palpable because I was happy today that the overall loss is small.buddtholomew wrote: I see GLD....Greenit can't be.
I say the same thing about my beanie babies. No matter how the market goes, they stay cute and cuddlyMark Leavy wrote: Gold swings so much that the only way I can hold it is physical.
I like being able to look into my locker and say. Why yes, there are 10 gold coins. And last year there were 10 gold coins. Maybe next year, I'll buy another coin and there will be 11.
I think of gold as 10,000 years of history where each 1 oz gold coin is worth either:
- 1 acre of mediocre farm land
- 1 beef on the hoof
- 1 month of unskilled manual labor
Next year it will be the same. And it will be the same forever in every part of the world.
So... I open my locker in a foreign land and I count my shekels and I say. Ah.... I have X months minimum wage. Or X acres of land. Or X beeves. And I am content.
Hopefully, the whole PP makes me money. But it is wonderful to see that my coins don't disappear on their own.
Yes, or late last night in Hong Kong. LTTs up in early action as well. I am rubbing my hands together and dreaming of future riches. Think of all the jewels!Pointedstick wrote: Looks like Wednesday was a good time to buy.![]()
Pointedstick wrote: Looks like Wednesday was a good time to buy.![]()
I have gold down less than 1/2% for the year at present, since my records show that the last print for physical in 2013 was $1180. So one more day like this and it will be up almost 3% for the year.Lowe wrote: Yeah, just one or two more days just like this... and gold will be back to 0% YTD.
Tech, I've seen you use that $1180 figure a couple times now. I believe that's incorrect. The final spot for physical in 2013 was above $1200.Libertarian666 wrote:I have gold down less than 1/2% for the year at present, since my records show that the last print for physical in 2013 was $1180. So one more day like this and it will be up almost 3% for the year.Lowe wrote: Yeah, just one or two more days just like this... and gold will be back to 0% YTD.
lol!dragoncar wrote:I say the same thing about my beanie babies. No matter how the market goes, they stay cute and cuddlyMark Leavy wrote: Gold swings so much that the only way I can hold it is physical.
I like being able to look into my locker and say. Why yes, there are 10 gold coins. And last year there were 10 gold coins. Maybe next year, I'll buy another coin and there will be 11.
I think of gold as 10,000 years of history where each 1 oz gold coin is worth either:
- 1 acre of mediocre farm land
- 1 beef on the hoof
- 1 month of unskilled manual labor
Next year it will be the same. And it will be the same forever in every part of the world.
...