Stretching the rebalance bands

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
SmallPotatoes
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:25 am

Stretching the rebalance bands

Post by SmallPotatoes »

Has anyone looked into increasing/modifying the recommended rebalancing bands?  For instance is it more or less profitable to rebalance at 10-40%, 15-35 ( a la HB), or something else? 

Just a curious.
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15233
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Stretching the rebalance bands

Post by dualstow »

For what it's worth, Harry addressed this in his Best-Laid Plans book ('87). If I remember correctly, he said that although one only needs to rebalance once a year, if you happen to see major movements in the market (can't look away) and something big is going on, you may want to make some adjustments. Where that stops and market timing starts is something we'll have to figure out.

On the other hand, I believe Harry wrote that once upon a time, he advised that pp investors could rebalance at 30% instead of 35% but later calculated that the extra activity did not produce any significant benefit.

Since I haven't rebalanced, I'm sure I'm going to be tempted when something hits 30%. My pp holdings are nowhere near that, though. Too new.
I, for one, would not have the stomach to hold on to 10% or 40%. Give me something like 34.5% so I can take some action already. My caveman genes are getting restless.
Last edited by dualstow on Tue May 17, 2011 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Abd here you stand no taller than the grass sees
And should you really chase so hard /The truth of sport plays rings around you
User avatar
Pkg Man
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:58 pm

Re: Stretching the rebalance bands

Post by Pkg Man »

HB also addressed this question from a caller on his show.  Anything less than 15% was not thought to be large enough to carry the portfolio when it's turn came.  And more than 35% and you risk a substantial loss if the markets turn against the asset.

As far as something less than the +- 10%, he said that 20/30 was fine, but as dualstow said, not likely worth the trouble.
"Machines are gonna fail...and the system's gonna fail"
Post Reply