Page 1 of 1
QCOM will be my next vp pick
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:08 am
by dualstow
QCOM will be my next vp pick disaster, as I bought some this week.
Re: QCOM will be my next vp pick
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:16 am
by dualstow
old thread, old pick. It is
not my next pick.
There’s an interesting article in the WSJ about Apple’s struggle to replace Qualcomm’s modem chip with something in-house.
[ but see Tortoise’s response below ]
It’s relatively difficult compared to designing their own microprocessor. In the meantime, Apple will buy the chips from Qcom through 2026.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-iphone-m ... e-6fe33d19
Re: QCOM will be my next vp pick
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2023 1:13 pm
by Smith1776
dualstow wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:16 am
old thread, old pick. It is
not my next pick.
There’s an interesting article in the WSJ about Apple’s struggle to replace Qualcomm’s modem chip with something in-house.
It’s relatively difficult compared to designing their own microprocessor. In the meantime, Apple will buy the chips from Qcom through 2026.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-iphone-m ... e-6fe33d19
Apple seems to be a company that just really doesn't want to become the next IBM.
I remember Larry Ellison articulating the mistake as, "They shipped the first Microsoft/Intel PC and called it the IBM PC."
Re: QCOM will be my next vp pick
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:40 pm
by Tortoise
dualstow wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:16 am
old thread, old pick. It is
not my next pick.
There’s an interesting article in the WSJ about Apple’s struggle to replace Qualcomm’s modem chip with something in-house.
It’s relatively difficult compared to designing their own microprocessor. In the meantime, Apple will buy the chips from Qcom through 2026.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-iphone-m ... e-6fe33d19
Well-written refutation of the recent WSJ hit piece on Apple's cellular modem project:
https://daringfireball.net/2023/09/crap ... re_like_it
Re: QCOM will be my next vp pick
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:58 pm
by dualstow
Thanks for posting that- it was a good read. Bad blood indeed between the two firms. That was even made clear in the apparently awful WSJ piece. Most of this is about timing and exaggeration, but in the middle a motive for a “hit piece” was made clear: Qualcomm doesn’t want Apple poaching any (more) empoyees. Fair enough.
Even my gullible self thought the line about the modem chip taking up half the phone was surprising.
I guess we’ll get to hear more of Apple’s side one day when their chip is finished and they can acknowledge the project.
In the meantime, I wonder if the WSJ will post a follow-up or some corrections.