Currency Risk: Which is worse?
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:26 pm
.
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8655
#2 is worse.ahhrunforthehills wrote: So opinions on Option 1 vs Option 2 would be appreciated (keeping in mind currency risk).
Do you mean lower volatility in just the equity portion, or the entire portfolio?blue_ruin17 wrote:...higher returns and lower volatility.
Over the entire portfolio.JohnnyFactor wrote:Do you mean lower volatility in just the equity portion, or the entire portfolio?blue_ruin17 wrote:...higher returns and lower volatility.
As I mentioned though, I tried to do the same thing by comparing a 100% Canadian HBPP to a portfolio that splits the stock AND bond + cash allocations between Canadian and U.S. assets. The returns were lower and the volatility was higher for that particular split compared to the 100% Canadian portfolio.(Real Returns)
50% CANADIAN EQUITIES 50% U.S. (within 25% HBPP equities allocation)
Overall Portfolio Stats (1971 to 2015)
Average Gain (Geometric) 5.258%
Average Gain (Arithmetic) 5.469%
Median Annual Gain 4.875%
Standard Deviation 6.742%
100% CANADIAN EQUITIES (within 25% HBPP equities allocation)
Overall Portfolio Stats (1971 to 2015)
Average Gain (Geometric) 4.977%
Average Gain (Arithmetic) 5.227%
Median Annual Gain 4.500%
Standard Deviation 7.376%