Why not Berkshire Hathaway?
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 12:28 pm
Why not BRKB: Berkshire Hathaway INC for the stock portion of the Permanent Portfolio?
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6753
One advantage is no dividends if you are accumulatingmukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Berkshire Hathaway is a multinational conglomeration of a diverse array of stocks picked by a guy who has beaten the S&P repeatedly, and with lower fees than any ETF.mukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Yeah, I'm wondering what'll happen to Berkshire Hathaway when Buffett departs. What'll be it's price? and will it even continue to trade?bedraggled wrote: The guys running Berkshire are getting very old. An article on cbsmarketwatch.com said their new hires did not beat the s & p 500 in 2014.
The no fees idea is nice but VTI may be the better bet.
However, it's very telling that that guy who has beaten the S&P has chosen the S&P as the investment for his progeny. Just google it even you haven't seen it already: Buffett wants his heirs to use 90% S&P, 10% cash or short-term treasuries. Not Berkshire shares.robtkatz wrote:Berkshire Hathaway is a multinational conglomeration of a diverse array of stocks picked by a guy who has beaten the S&P repeatedly, and with lower fees than any ETF.mukramesh wrote: Why use Berkshire Hathaway? In your opinion, what advantage is there in using it over a general stock index for the PP?
Its all going to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which, so far, aren't careerists.Sam Brazil wrote: More telling would be what he's doing with money that he plans to donate or go to causes that he cares about, beyond enriching his "lucky sperm club" members.