Re: Who Owns the Future?
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:26 am
I don't find this compelling at all. It could have been written 600 years ago describing how people who handwrite copies of books will be put out of business. Or a few hundred years ago describing how people who pick cotton would be put out of business. Or 100 years ago describing how people who sell horse carriages will be put out of business.
The world will constantly change. And outside of government intervention, that change is for the better of all people collectively, on a whole, net basis. While some people are put out of work, a significantly larger number of people benefit from cheaper and better products.
With government intervention we have shenanigans like taxi driver medallions costing $500k each which is terrific for the handful of people with medallions and terrible for everyone who is a consumer of taxi rides.
Government ensures a few benefit at the expense of the many. The free market ensures the many benefit at the expense of the few. (That was a pretty cool line. I wonder if anyone else has said this before in a better way?)
The world will constantly change. And outside of government intervention, that change is for the better of all people collectively, on a whole, net basis. While some people are put out of work, a significantly larger number of people benefit from cheaper and better products.
With government intervention we have shenanigans like taxi driver medallions costing $500k each which is terrific for the handful of people with medallions and terrible for everyone who is a consumer of taxi rides.
Government ensures a few benefit at the expense of the many. The free market ensures the many benefit at the expense of the few. (That was a pretty cool line. I wonder if anyone else has said this before in a better way?)