Wolf of Wall Street
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:20 pm
Anyone seen it?
I thought it very entertaining.
Opinions?
I thought it very entertaining.
Opinions?
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5535
The criticism seems to be that it encourages or celebrates the behavior, which may be true. Still, it's probably accurate, and if I saw the movie knowing nothing about Wall Street, I would be very hesitant to take any advice from a stock broker.MediumTex wrote: I haven't seen it, but the reviews make it sound like Wall Street is populated by narcissistic misogynistic psychopaths who attach themselves to the face of society like a vampire squid.
Seeing this side of our financial markets is apparently upsetting to some people.
Most movies celebrate or implicitly encourage some kind of inappropriate behavior.AdamA wrote:The criticism seems to be that it encourages or celebrates the behavior, which may be true.MediumTex wrote: I haven't seen it, but the reviews make it sound like Wall Street is populated by narcissistic misogynistic psychopaths who attach themselves to the face of society like a vampire squid.
Seeing this side of our financial markets is apparently upsetting to some people.
Oh god. I'm so sorry. Were you tricked into it? That happened to me once. Requiem for a Dream is one of those movies that you never, ever want to see again, yet afterwards you feel strangely compelled to inflict it on others.MediumTex wrote: I happen to have seen such a movie just last night in the form of Requiem for a Dream, but movies like that are unusual.
Jonah Hill was hilarious as always. Otherwise, I felt like it was one more Goodfellas. That's not to say it was bad. It's just that I've seen too many movies with this formula, or at least of this genre.AdamA wrote: Anyone seen it?
I thought it very entertaining.
Opinions?
I thought Goodfellas was a better movie because it's plot and script seemed more robust. Wolf is scene after scene of this guy's craziness.dualstow wrote: Jonah Hill was hilarious as always. Otherwise, I felt like it was one more Goodfellas. That's not to say it was bad. It's just that I've seen too many movies with this formula, or at least of this genre.
I was sick and had a lot of work to do last night and thought I would take a 90 minute break to clear my head so I watched it.Pointedstick wrote:Oh god. I'm so sorry. Were you tricked into it? That happened to me once. Requiem for a Dream is one of those movies that you never, ever want to see again, yet afterwards you feel strangely compelled to inflict it on others.MediumTex wrote: I happen to have seen such a movie just last night in the form of Requiem for a Dream, but movies like that are unusual.

I saw that movie and really liked it. Ben Stiller (of all people) was great. I was surprised that the movie didn't more publicity.MediumTex wrote: I remember one time in the late 1990s I was watching a film called Permanent Midnight in the theater. The film was about a heroin addict...
So it's a documentary then?MediumTex wrote: I haven't seen it, but the reviews make it sound like Wall Street is populated by narcissistic misogynistic psychopaths who attach themselves to the face of society like a vampire squid.
Seeing this side of our financial markets is apparently upsetting to some people.
I agree on all counts.AdamA wrote:I thought Goodfellas was a better movie because it's plot and script seemed more robust. Wolf is scene after scene of this guy's craziness.dualstow wrote: Jonah Hill was hilarious as always. Otherwise, I felt like it was one more Goodfellas. That's not to say it was bad. It's just that I've seen too many movies with this formula, or at least of this genre.
Still, there were some great scenes, especially the one with Matthew Mcconaughey.
Yves agrees with you :-)MediumTex wrote: I haven't seen it, but the reviews make it sound like Wall Street is populated by narcissistic misogynistic psychopaths who attach themselves to the face of society like a vampire squid.
Seeing this side of our financial markets is apparently upsetting to some people.
But, the moralists will howl, this makes crime look glamorous and rewarding! Well guess what? Crime is rewarding, and if you can do it on a big enough scale, you can even buy some glamour. So why are you shooting the messenger?