Wildly differing traditional diets of various tribes: comments e.g. Gumby?
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 9:54 am
Theory is all well and good but one can create theoretical arguments for anything (and people have), so the stomach is this way so you should eat this and not this, is less persuasive to me then reality i.e. people have eaten this kind of diet and been free of traditional diseases (obviously correlation does not equal causation, so this is not perfect either but perhaps more reliable then e.g. global cooling fears in the 1970s and global warming fears since then).
http://www.precisionnutrition.com/best-diet
--For example, the Arctic Inuit and African Masai eat traditional diets that are very high in fat and animal products with very few vegetables.
--Conversely, the Kitavans in the South Pacific eat traditional diets that are low in fat but very high in vegetables and starchy carbs.
--And the Tokelau near New Zealand eat traditional diets that are very high in saturated fats.
Crazy differences here…[bolding mine] yet all traditional diet eaters are relatively healthy people with minimal incidences of cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, inflammatory obesity, etc. And this is only possible because the human body is amazingly adaptable to a host of different dietary conditions.
Not that Barardi is my gold standard, but he supports the common sense (to me and many) that different people can thrive on different diets.
Comments, anyone?
http://www.precisionnutrition.com/best-diet
--For example, the Arctic Inuit and African Masai eat traditional diets that are very high in fat and animal products with very few vegetables.
--Conversely, the Kitavans in the South Pacific eat traditional diets that are low in fat but very high in vegetables and starchy carbs.
--And the Tokelau near New Zealand eat traditional diets that are very high in saturated fats.
Crazy differences here…[bolding mine] yet all traditional diet eaters are relatively healthy people with minimal incidences of cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, inflammatory obesity, etc. And this is only possible because the human body is amazingly adaptable to a host of different dietary conditions.
Not that Barardi is my gold standard, but he supports the common sense (to me and many) that different people can thrive on different diets.
Comments, anyone?