How free is your state?
Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 9:10 pm
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4628
Happily enough, it has a tool to allow you to weight things yourself, so you can make a ranking with personal taxes being more important.MediumTex wrote: Oklahoma ahead of Texas?
Please.
How can a state with a state income tax rank ahead of a neighboring state without a state income tax when the states are otherwise similar?
Saying Oklahoma is freer that Texas is like saying Canada is freer than the U.S. Even if it were true, it just wouldn't sound right.
When I moved to my current location, laws and freedom weren't really on my mind. But the information in these reports has been very useful in helping me plan my next move.TennPaGa wrote: I'm curious... How important is a state's freedom ranking as a factor for where you have chosen to live relative to other factors like family, education, and economic considerations?
A lot of the most "free" states struck me as undesirable places to live. Personally, I love cities and I guess those require some lib'rals to get really cooking.moda0306 wrote: Utah the 10th freest state? Aren't their liquor laws ridiculous? State-run stores and all that?
Not that alcohol regulation is the best measure of freedom, but I think one person's inconvenience is another person's inexcusible offense... measuring freedom has to be somewhat difficult when different people have different ideas of what freedoms they think are most important.
That's why I appreciate that the site lets you determine for yourself what's important to you, via the "personalize" button. Personally I don't care about alcohol laws since I don't drink, so those are a non-factor to me in determining what's a desirable place to live.moda0306 wrote: Utah the 10th freest state? Aren't their liquor laws ridiculous? State-run stores and all that?
Not that alcohol regulation is the best measure of freedom, but I think one person's inconvenience is another person's inexcusible offense... measuring freedom has to be somewhat difficult when different people have different ideas of what freedoms they think are most important.
Yeah, #50 was the state I moved from too back when I moved to state #49, then I eventually moved back to state #50 again.Ad Orientem wrote: Second to last. Who the hell beat us?!
Edit: Oh, of course it was the state I moved from.
How do the property taxes and property values compare? I pay 2.53% in my neighborhood (with a 20% homestead exemption) in Houston.edsanville wrote: Nice website. My home state (New Hampshire) is 4th, but I'm going to be leaving for Texas next year for tax reasons.
I love most things about New Hampshire, but I hate the idiotic 8.5% business tax here. Texas has 0% income tax, 0% business tax (on sole proprietorships like mine), and a low sales tax. New Hampshire has 0% income tax and 0% sales tax, but I don't buy much because I'm a saver. So, I'm looking at 8.5% overall taxes in New Hampshire versus ~1.25% overall taxes in Texas.
Texas wins, so I'm outta here and I'm taking my small business with me.
Here's a great website I found a while back that attempts to answer that question:hoost wrote: How do the property taxes and property values compare? I pay 2.53% in my neighborhood (with a 20% homestead exemption) in Houston.
I hope you don't have any children. Texas has some of the worst public services of any state in the country. It's schools are in a heated race with Mississippi for ranking dead last nationally. (MS is winning that race by a nose right now.) So yeah Texas has very low taxes and one of the lowest levels of government regulation of business. But that is a two edged sword. Texas has the highest percentage of people without medical insurance in the country and a fertilizer plant explosion just wiped out most of a small town. There are few safety regulations and those that exist are rarely enforced. You get what you pay for.edsanville wrote: Nice website. My home state (New Hampshire) is 4th, but I'm going to be leaving for Texas next year for tax reasons.
I love most things about New Hampshire, but I hate the idiotic 8.5% business tax here. Texas has 0% income tax, 0% business tax (on sole proprietorships like mine), and a low sales tax. New Hampshire has 0% income tax and 0% sales tax, but I don't buy much because I'm a saver. So, I'm looking at 8.5% overall taxes in New Hampshire versus ~1.25% overall taxes in Texas.
Texas wins, so I'm outta here and I'm taking my small business with me.
Out of curiosity, do you see that as the state's fault, or the fault of the people living in the state? And is there evidence that this is a real problem? As in, does Texas also lead the nation in medical bankruptcies or something, for example?Ad Orientem wrote: Texas has the highest percentage of people without medical insurance in the country [...]
I didn't compare property taxes, because I'm a renter. From what I've been able to tell, rents in Texas are generally lower than those in New Hampshire.hoost wrote: How do the property taxes and property values compare? I pay 2.53% in my neighborhood (with a 20% homestead exemption) in Houston.
I don't have children, but Texas is a big state with many schools to choose from. I was reading about the Lubbock school system. From Wikipedia:Ad Orientem wrote: I hope you don't have any children. Texas has some of the worst public services of any state in the country. It's schools are in a heated race with Mississippi for ranking dead last nationally. (MS is winning that race by a nose right now.) So yeah Texas has very low taxes and one of the lowest levels of government regulation of business. But that is a two edged sword. Texas has the highest percentage of people without medical insurance in the country and a fertilizer plant explosion just wiped out most of a small town. There are few safety regulations and those that exist are rarely enforced. You get what you pay for.
Where does public school funding come from in Texas? In New Hampshire, it comes from property taxes (which are local). Anyway, I sincerely believe that public school quality has a very weak correlation to the amount of money spent.Lubbock High School has been recognized for three consecutive years by Newsweek as one of the top high schools in the United States.
Great points, PS. A lot of those numbers (people with no health insurance, people doing poorly in school) are skewed by a large number of uneducated, poor, immigrants. Not saying they all are, but enough to skew the numbers a large amount.Pointedstick wrote:Out of curiosity, do you see that as the state's fault, or the fault of the people living in the state? And is there evidence that this is a real problem? As in, does Texas also lead the nation in medical bankruptcies or something, for example?Ad Orientem wrote: Texas has the highest percentage of people without medical insurance in the country [...]
That only shows you your state property tax burden. It leaves out county, town, city, and school taxes, which in NY add up to more than the state alone.Pointedstick wrote:Here's a great website I found a while back that attempts to answer that question:hoost wrote: How do the property taxes and property values compare? I pay 2.53% in my neighborhood (with a 20% homestead exemption) in Houston.
http://www.creditsesame.com/blog/proper ... -07072011/
Somebody has to pay those taxes, right? Wouldn't the landlord simply bundle the costs of property taxes into rent? I suppose that a multi-unit dwelling might be more tax-efficient, but I would expect rent on a single-family house to be only slightly higher than the equivalent mortgage payment plus property taxes.rocketdog wrote: People always say when you pay rent you're throwing away your money. Well, my property taxes alone are as much as I used to pay in rent when I lived in an apartment! So property taxes are just like rent in that regard: you're throwing your money away either way.
Yep, it's crazy here. The closer to NYC, the worse it gets.Pointedstick wrote: Also, 3.25%? Yikes.
Sure, part of the rent payment goes to pay the property taxes on an apartment. But you still get a place to live and no maintenance worries or risk of principal.Pointedstick wrote:Somebody has to pay those taxes, right? Wouldn't the landlord simply bundle the costs of property taxes into rent? I suppose that a multi-unit dwelling might be more tax-efficient, but I would expect rent on a single-family house to be only slightly higher than the equivalent mortgage payment plus property taxes.rocketdog wrote: People always say when you pay rent you're throwing away your money. Well, my property taxes alone are as much as I used to pay in rent when I lived in an apartment! So property taxes are just like rent in that regard: you're throwing your money away either way.
Also, 3.25%? Yikes.