Verdict Reached in John Edwards Case
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 2:47 pm
In an unusual ruling, the court set Edwards free, but sentenced his hair to 27 months in federal custody.
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2659
Edwards wishes his hair one final, sad goodbye:MediumTex wrote: In an unusual ruling, the court set Edwards free, but sentenced his hair to 27 months in federal custody.
"I'll write you every day. You'll never be far from my mind...well, actually you will...but I will miss you terribly and I will ache for the day we can be reunited. You're the only one who never let me down. You are my alpha, omega and faithful provider of lush dome coverage."Lone Wolf wrote:Edwards wishes his hair one final, sad goodbye:MediumTex wrote: In an unusual ruling, the court set Edwards free, but sentenced his hair to 27 months in federal custody.
![]()
What's the difference...really...between Bill Clinton and John Edwards?jackh wrote: This thread kind of reminds me of the trial of Imelda Marcos in NYC when her lawyer (Jerry Spence) argued that here in America we don't say that since she has 2,000 pairs of shoes, let's send her to prison for the rest of her life.
In this case it's like the lawyer said yes, he's a lying philandering, adulterous narcissistic, hair-primping politician but here in America we don't put people in prison just for that.
But maybe we should if they get as far as John Edwards did to running the whole show.
Clinton was a conservative communist.MediumTex wrote: What's the difference...really...between Bill Clinton and John Edwards?
Clinton probably has a little higher IQ and better luck.
The forum's resident, staunch Republican pops his head up once again in response to certain trigger keywords!Reub wrote: Please! We are trying to attract more women to these here forums!
I'd say brains and political skill. Both men are slick (and capable of, er, "ethical flexibility"), but Clinton always struck me as a very cunning, crafty guy. I never saw those same flashes of brilliance in Edwards. Even if you thought that Clinton was a total snake, it was hard not to be impressed by how skilled of a politician he is.MediumTex wrote: What's the difference...really...between Bill Clinton and John Edwards?
Clinton probably has a little higher IQ and better luck.
Name-calling? Really?MachineGhost wrote:The forum's resident, staunch Republican pops his head up once again in response to certain trigger keywords!Reub wrote: Please! We are trying to attract more women to these here forums!
Seriously, what job did you do for the government, Reub? Were you one of them there enfabled "bureaucrats"?
It wasn't name calling, it was a sarcastic comment based on another thread about invisible bureaucrats that I'm sure most have read.Coffee wrote: Name-calling? Really?
Totally uncalled for.
I might just take a few deep breaths and keep things moving forward.MachineGhost wrote: On the offhand chance I offended at least Reub and you, I publically apologize. I'll also put on my dunce cap, go to a corner and self-impose an exile period from the forum.
What a tough job.Reub wrote: I'm not offended in the least by your posts, Machine Ghost, so no exile is necessary. I enjoy these forums and the great posters that reside here. Much of what I say is tongue-in-cheek and I hope it is taken that way. As far as what I do as a federal govt worker I hope that I am far from a bureaucrat. I'm a soon to be retiring air traffic controller in a very busy radar facility in New York. After 29+ years at this job, the FAA has decided that I'm too old to continue working (age 56 is mandatory retirement), so I will be retiring and relying on the PP to protect me.
After seeing Season 2 of Breaking Bad, I concur on the apparent difficulty of this job... though using that show as a realism gauge might be a mistake.MediumTex wrote:What a tough job.Reub wrote: I'm not offended in the least by your posts, Machine Ghost, so no exile is necessary. I enjoy these forums and the great posters that reside here. Much of what I say is tongue-in-cheek and I hope it is taken that way. As far as what I do as a federal govt worker I hope that I am far from a bureaucrat. I'm a soon to be retiring air traffic controller in a very busy radar facility in New York. After 29+ years at this job, the FAA has decided that I'm too old to continue working (age 56 is mandatory retirement), so I will be retiring and relying on the PP to protect me.
Thanks for sharing that.